4208
T. Takamura-Enya, R. Ishii / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 4206–4209
In conclusion, a simple modification of dG with BODIPY-FL
could be used as a mutagen detector for oxidative DNA damages
and alkylating reagents. It would be possible to use reagent 3 in
an in vivo system such as for cell lines or in a test paper application
to test for mutagens in the environment similar to pH test paper.
Evaluation of these approaches of compound 3 and the detailed
mechanism of its on/off fluorescence are now being studied in
our laboratory.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid from the
Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture and by the Japan
Society for the Promotion of Science and The Science Research
Promotion Fund.
Supplementary data
Figure 5. Fluorescence intensity of BODIPY-dG treated with alkylating reagents, 5
and 6.
Supplementary data (the visualization of the fluorescence of
BODIPY-dG with alkylating reagents, fluorescence recovery of
13
BODIPY-dG with DMBA under UVA light condition, 1H- and
C-NMR of compound 3) associated with this article can be found,
be detected in the same system. Phenalenone 7 is a known con-
comitant present in the atmosphere and is also known to be a sin-
glet oxygen producer under black light irradiation (Fig. 4). Singlet
oxygen, once produced, can attack dG to form a highly oxidized
product, 4-OH-8-oxo-dG 1, with a yield of around 40%.22,23 Because
the electronic properties of the oxidized compound 1 are different
from those of dG, the fluorescence quenching by the electron trans-
fer pathway observed in the original compound 3 will not be ob-
served when the oxidation of dG occurs. Indeed, BODIPY-dG 3
with phenalenone 7 under UV light conditions had strong, dose-
dependent fluorescence emission (Fig. 6).24 Moreover, DMBA 8
can also recover the fluorescence of BODIPY-dG, probably because
of the oxidative damage to the dG moiety of compound 3 (Fig. 4,
Supplementary Fig. 2). Koutaka et al. showed that the on/off fluo-
rescence of the fluorophore can be explained by the HOMO level
of the donor (dG) and acceptor (BODIPY) compounds.25 A semi-
empirical chemical calculation showed that the HOMO energies
of BODIPY, dG, and 1 were ꢀ8.881, ꢀ8.811, and ꢀ9.985 eV, respec-
References and notes
1. Brambilla, G.; Mattioli, F.; Robbiano, L.; Martelli, A. Mutat. Res. 2010, 705, 2.
2. Poirier, M. C.; Weston, A. Encyclopedia of Cancer; Academic Press: Maryland
Heights, 2002.
3. Prestona, R. J.; Rossa, J. A. Comprehensive Toxicol. 2010, 1, 349.
4. Gates, K. S. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2009, 22, 1747.
5. Misiaszek, R.; Crean, C.; Joffe, A.; Geacintov, N. E.; Shafirovich, V. J. Biol. Chem.
2004, 279, 32106.
6. Nagao, M.; Sugimura, T. Food Borne Carcinogens: heterocyclic Amines; John Wiley
& Sons: New York, 2000.
7. Beland, F. A.; Marques, M. M. IARC Sci. Publ. 1994, 125, 229.
8. Baird, W. M.; Hooven, L. A.; Mahadevan, B. A. Environ. Mol. Mutagen 2005, 45,
106.
9. Wallesa, S. A. S. Toxicol. Lett. 1980, 5, 161.
10. Meier, I.; Shephard, S. E.; Lutz, W. K. Mutat. Res./Rev. Genetic Toxicol. 1990, 238,
193.
11. Loudet, A.; Burgess, K. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 4891.
12. Haugland, R. P. Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Chemicals, ninth
ed.; Molecular Probes: Eugene, 2002.
13. Torimura, M.; Kurata, S.; Yamada, K.; Yokomaku, T.; Kamagata, Y.; Kanagawa,
T.; Kurane, R. Anal. Sci. 2001, 17, 155.
14. Kurata, S.; Kanagawa, T.; Yamada, K.; Torimura, M.; Yokomaku, T.; Kamagata,
Y.; Kurane, R. Nucl. Acids Res. 2001, 29, e34.
26
tively. The lower HOMO value of 1 compared to that of BODIPY
could explain why the highly oxidized dG moiety in compound 3
reduced its quenching property.
15. McEwen, D. P.; Gee, K. R.; Kang, H. C.; Neubig, R. R. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 291,
109.
16. Korlach, J.; Baird, D. W.; Heikal, A. A.; Gee, K. R.; Hoffman, G. R.; Webb, W. W.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 2800.
17. Malan, S. F.; van Marle, A.; Menge, W. M.; Zuliana, V.; Hoffman, M.;
Timmerman, H.; Leurs, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 6495.
18. Jang, H. G.; Park, M.; Wishnok, J. S.; Tannenbaum, S. R.; Wogan, G. N. Anal.
Biochem. 2006, 359, 151.
19. Hogendorf, W. F. J.; Verhagen, C. P.; Malta, E.; Goosen, N.; Overkleeft, H. S.;
Filippov, D. V.; Van der Marel, G. A. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10430.
20. Preparation of the compound 3: Into the solution of N2-phenoxyacetyl-30-
TBDMS-20-deoxyguanosine (0.2 mmol) and BODIPY-FL (0.4 mmol) in
dichloromethane was added DCC (2 equiv) with DMAP (2 equiv). After the
reaction mixture was left overnight, it was filtered and filtrate was evaporated
to dryness. Residual material was subjected to a column chromatography on
silica gel to give BODIPY-modified protected dG, which were further subjected
to diisopropylamine in methanol for 2 h. After purified by column
chromatography, resulting compounds were treated with triethylamine
trihydrogen fluoride complex in THF. After 24 h, solvent was evaporated and
the residual material was suspended in acetonitrile. Resulting precipitation
was obtained by centrifugation and washed twice with acetonitrile to give the
desired 50-BODIPY-FL-20-deoxyguanosine 3. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-
d6)™ = 10.50 (br s, 1H), 7.75 (s, 1H), 7.57(s, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H) 6.34
(br s, 1H), 6.23 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 6.18(s, 1H) 6.01 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 5.32 (br s,
1H), 4.25 (br s, 1H), 4.10 (ddd, J = 42.2, 11.8, 5.1 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (br s, 1H), 2.98 (t,
J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.67–2.60 (m, 2H), 2.40–2.36 8 (m, 2H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 2.13 (t,
J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6)™ = 171.80, 159.77, 156.73,
156.17, 153.69, 150.99, 144.53, 135.24, 134.69, 132.99, 128.72, 125.53, 120.52,
116.78, 116.54, 83.98, 82.41, 70.65, 64.44, 32.15, 23.43, 14.62, 11.07, 10.83,
Figure 6. Fluorescence intensity of BODIPY-dG
phenalenone. Phenalenone is abbreviated as PhO.
3 treated with compound 7,