reduction products by chiral-phase chromatography, the crude
materials were hydrogenated in the presence of Raney-Ni
to the corresponding amines (75-85% yield). Enantiomer
separations were then possible by chiral-phase GC following
derivatization with trifluoroacetic anhydride. Good optical
purities were obtained from 2-alkyl-substituted nitroalkenes
Scheme 1
1
9
3c-f; by contrast, 3-alkyl-substituted products were obtained
in essentially racemic form (Table 1). The absolute configu-
Table 1. â-Nitroacrylate Reductions by S. carlbergensis Old
Yellow Enzyme
starting
compd
conversion (%)
after 8 h
% ee
(absolute config)
a
[R]Db
(
(
(
E)-3a
E)-3b
Z)-3c
>98
50
>98
>98
>98
>98
8 (R)
8 (R)
91 (R)
94 (R)
96 (R)
-13.0 (c 0.94)
-2.7 (c 1.0)
+1.2 (c 1.0)
-1.6 (c 1.0)
nitroacrylates via mesylate derivatives.15 Both 2-alkyl-
(Z)-3d
(
(
Z)-3e
Z)-3f
substituted nitroacrylates 3a and b were obtained predomi-
nantly in the (E)-form, whereas the (Z)-isomers predominated
for 3-substituted alkenes 3c-g.16 Because olefin geometry
directly impacted the stereoselectivity of enzymatic reduc-
tions, the major alkene isomers were chromatographically
enriched (>95% geometric purity).
a
Determined by chiral-phase GC following nitro group reduction and
derivatization with trifluoroacetic anhydride. b Measured in aqueous solution
at the indicated concentrations from hydrochloride salts at room tempera-
ture.enzyme under the same conditions after 48 h.
8
20a
Biocatalytic reductions utilized S. carlsbergensis old
yellow enzyme that had been purified by affinity chroma-
rations were assigned by the direction of optical rotations
of the free â -amino acids as their hydrochloride salts
17
2
tography to avoid possible complications from Escherichia
coli alkene reductases. NADPH was supplied by a cofactor
regeneration system (glucose-6-phosphate/baker’s yeast glu-
cose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase).
(obtained by acid hydrolysis in 88-95% yields). Overall
2
yields of â -amino acids from â-nitroalkenes ranged from
57 to 73%.
Preliminary studies had revealed that olefin isomerization
was more rapid under alkaline conditions, and pH 6.93 was
selected to minimize this side-reaction while maintaining
acceptable enzyme efficiency. A 2-fold molar excess of
â-cyclodextrin (relative to the nitroacrylate) was also in-
cluded to enhance substrate solubility under aqueous condi-
tions. Unfortunately, the solubility of the â-cyclodextrin/3g
complex was still too low for efficient reduction, and no
reaction was observed in this case. Both the substrates (3a-f
and glucose-6-phosphate) and the two enzymes were added
portionwise to enhance the longevity of the processes, which
were carried out at room temperature.18 Reactions were
monitored by GC/MS, and complete substrate consumption
was observed after ca. 8 h in all cases except for (E)-3b.
NMR and GC analysis of the crude reaction products
verified that only the olefins had been reduced and the nitro
groups remained intact. No significant levels of side products
were observed, and yields ranged from 74 to 98%. Because
it was not possible to determine the optical purities of the
The results of our previous studies of alkyl-substituted
-cyclohexenone reductions by old yellow enzyme were
8
2
2
consistent with the net trans-addition of H mechanism
20
elucidated by Massey and Karplus (Scheme 2). Hydride
â-addition (from reduced FMN) occurs from the bottom face
18) Reaction mixtures contained final concentrations of NADP+ (20
(
µmoles, 15 mg), glucose-6-phosphate (1.27 mmoles, 429 mg), glucose-6-
phosphate dehydrogenase (500 µg), nitroacrylate (25mM), and purified OYE
(
20-40 µg) in 100 mM KPi, pH 6.95 in total volumes of 50 mL.
Conversions were carried out at room temperature. Reaction components
except for KPi buffer) were added in 10 equal portions every 45 minutes
(
and the mixtures were sampled for GC analysis periodically. After nearly
all of the substrate had been consumed, the reaction mixture was extracted
with Et2O (3 × (5 × reaction volume)). The combined organic extracts
were washed with brine (1 volume) and water (1 volume), dried with
MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo.
(19) Crude reduction products (ca. 1.5 mmol) were hydrogenated at 500
psi in the presence of Raney nickel (200 mg) in EtOH (50 mL) at room
temperature. After 16 h, the resulting solution was filtered through Celite
and the solvent was evaporated. A portion of the residue (50 mg) was
dissolved in 6 M HCl and the solution was held at reflux overnight. The
solution was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford a yellow oil,
which was washed with EtOAc to remove any nonpolar impurities. Water
2
was removed by rotary evaporator to yield the â -amino acids as
(
14) Spectral data for 2f: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 4.85 (d, J ) 13.5 Hz,
hydrochloride salts. Spectral data matched those reported previously:
Nejman, M.; Sliwinska, A.; Zwierzak, A. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 8536-
8541. Gangadhar, N.; Huber, V. J.; Lum, C.; Goodman, B. A. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 3527-3529. Sammis, G. M.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 4442-4443. Lee, H. S.; Park, J. D.; Kim, D. H. Bull. Korean
Chem. Soc. 2003, 24, 467-472.
1
H), 4.70 (d, J ) 13.3 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (m, 2H), 3.61 (s, 1H), 2.0 (m, 1H),
.36 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.0 (d, J ) 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.92 (d, J ) 6.9 Hz, 3H);
C NMR (CDCl3) δ 173.1, 80.3, 77.7, 63.1, 34.3, 17.0, 16.4, 14.2.
1
13
(
(
15) Melton, J.; McMurry, J. E. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 2138-2139.
16) Olefin configurations for 3c-g were assigned based on the chemical
shift values of the allylic protons, e.g., 2.11 ppm for (Z)-3c versus 2.60
ppm for the methyl ester of (E)-3c (ref 15a), as described by Denmark and
Marcin (J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3850-3856.).
(20) (a) Kohli, R. M.; Massey, V. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 32763-
32770. (b) Xu, D.; Kohli, R. M.; Massey, V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1999, 96, 3556-3561. (c) Brown, B. J.; Hyun, J. w.; Duvvuri, S.; Karplus,
P. A.; Massey, V. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 2138-2145. (d) Fox, K. M.;
Karplus, P. A. Structure 1994, 2, 1089-1105.
(17) Abramovitz, A. S.; Massey, V. J. Biol. Chem. 1976, 251, 5321-
5
326.
6132
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 26, 2006