NEW PROCEDURE FOR SYNTHESIZING ALKYL ESTERS
341
substituents is unambiguously determined by the down-
field values of chemical shifts (δ С2 = 145.80 and δ С5 =
154.26 ppm), the latter signal correlating in the HMBC
experiment with protons of the acetyl group which
resonate at 2.57 ppm.
[90 MHz (1Н), 22.5 MHz (13С)] spectrometers in CDCl3,
chemical shifts δ (ppm) were measured relative to TMS.
GS-MS data were obtained on a Finnigan MAT-112S
chromatography-mass spectrometer (electron impact
70 eV). The chromatographic analysis was carried out on
a Chrom-5 instrument [a 1.2 m × 33 mm column, silicon
SE-30 (5%) as the istationary, on a Chromaton N-AW-
HMDS, a temperature mode from 50 up to 250ºC with
the heating rate of 8 deg min−1 and helium as a gas-carrier
(47 ml min−1)].
We can assume that, similarly to the case of thiophene,
the probable reaction scheme includes the successive
alkylation of 2-acetyl-2-furan by carbon tetrachloride
with the formation of 5 trichloromethyl-2-acetyl-2-furan,
which undergoes alcoholysis with the conversion to the
corresponding 5-acetyl-2-furancarboxylic acid ester:
As the initial reagents we used commercially
available 2-acetyl-2-furan, methanol, ethanol, propanol,
isopropanol, and carbon tetrachloride, which were
preminarily distilled. Iron acetylacetonate, ferrocene,
and iron bromide (“Acros” made) were recrystallized and
dried in a vacuum desiccator before using.
[Fe]
CH3CO
+ CCl4
CH3CO
+ CCl3
+ CH3OH
General procedure of obtaining esters of 5-acetyl-2-
furancarboxylic acid. In a stainless-steel microreactor
(V = 17 ml) or in a glass ampula (V = 20 ml) 0.1 mmol
of Fe(acac)3, 10 mmol of 2-acetyl-2-furan, 80 mmol of
an aliphatic alcohol, and 20 mmol of CCl4 were charged
under argon; the reactor was hermetically closed (the
ampula was sealed) and heated up at 120ºC within 6−9 h
with permanent stirring.After the reaction termination the
reactor (ampule) was cooled to room temperature, opened,
and the reaction mixture was filtered through a silica gel
layer (eluent−hexane). After distilling off a solvent the
residuel was recrystallized or distilled in a vacuum.
CH3CO
CO2CH3,
This assumption is supported by the fact that when
methanol is replaced by ethyl, propyl, and isopropyl
alcohols, ethyl (II), propyl (III), and isopropyl (IV)
esters, respectively, of 5-acetyl-2-furan-carboxylic acid
are formed with fairly high yields. Furthermore HCl and
esters of the alcohols taken in the reaction were detected
in the reaction mass. A reactively low yield of ethyl 5-
acetyl-2-furancarboxylate (II) is attributable to the fact
that the side reaction of the formation of diethyl ester
readily proceeds:
Methyl 5-acetyl-2-furancarboxylate (I). Mp
100.5−101ºC (according to the published data [9] 101−
102ºC). Yield 95%. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 2.57 (s,
3H, СН3СO), 3.95 (s, 3H, ОСН3), 7.15-7.25 (m, 2H,
furan, =CH−СH=). 13С NMR, δ, ppm: 26.30 (COCH3),
52.37 (ОСН3), 116.54 (С4), 118.75 (С3), 145.80 (С2),
154.26 (С5), 158.62 (COOCH3), 187.46 (COCH3). Mass
spectrum, m/e (Irel, %): 168 [M]+ (42), 43 (30), 59 (10),
69 (12), 79 (5), 95 (21), 125 (4), 137 (20), 153 (100), 154
(10), 169 (18). Found (%): C 57.28, Н 5.06, O 37.66.
Calculated (%): C 57.14, Н 4.80, O 38.06.
CH3CO
+ CCl4 + ROH
[Catalyst]
CO2R
CH3CO
[Cat.] - Fe(C5H5)2, Fe(acac)3, FeBr2; R = Me (I), Et (II),
n-Pr (III), i-Pr (IV).
Ethyl 5-acetyl-2-furancarboxylate (II). Mp 71−72ºC
(according to the published data [9] 71−71.5ºC). Yield 45
%. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 1.38 (t, 3JHH =7.2 Hz, 3H,
CH3CH2), 2.55 (s, 3H, COСН3), 4.39 (q, 3JHH = 7.2 Hz,
2H, CH3CH2), 7.15−7.25 (m, 2H, furan, =CH-СH=). 13С
NMR, δ, ppm: 14.21 (CH3CH2), 26.30 (COСН3), 61.63
(ОСН2), 116.59 (С4), 118.54 (С3), 146.53 (С2), 154.14
(С5), 158.14 (COOEt), 187.51 (COCH3). Found (%):
C 60.01, Н 5.86, O 34.13. С9Н10О4. Calculated (%):
C 59.33, Н 5.53, O 35.13.
We have found experimentally that the optimal ratio
of the catalyst and reagents is Fe(acac)3 : [2-acetyl-2-
furan] : [CCl4] : [ROH] =1 : 100 : 200 : 800.
EXPERIMENTAL
The 1Н and 13С NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker
Avance-400 (400.13 and 100.62 MHz) and JEOLFX90Q
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 82 No. 2 2009