C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
O-Cuintra ) 119.1° is expected to give rise to strong antiferro-
magnetic exchange,13 as observed for all compounds. The absence
of an ordering temperature in 2 is a clear indication of strong spin
frustration, which inhibits the tendency for spins to order and hence
suppresses TC relative to ΘCW. For 2, spin frustration is sufficiently
pronounced that no ordering is observed to the temperature limit
of the SQUID susceptometer, despite the value of ΘCW ) -314
K! With the introduction of Cu(II) ions into the interlayer site, a
ferromagnetic exchange interaction is engendered owing to the
introduction of an additional Cuintra-O-Cuinter superexchange
pathway; a Cuintra-O-Cuintra ) 97.0° is expected to give rise to
a weak ferromagnetic exchange interaction.13 With spin frustration
suppressing antiferromagnetic ordering within the kagome´ layers,
the ferromagnetic ordering event involving the interlayer Cu(II)
ions is readily observed (see Figure 2a). Moreover, the increase in
|ΘCW| as the paramagnetic occupancy of the interlayer site decreases
(Figure 2b) is consistent with the contribution of the ferromagnetic
exchange interaction becoming less prevalent as x f 1.
Ramirez has provided a measure for spin frustration by defining
f ) |ΘCW|/TC, with values of f > 10 signifying a strong effect.2 As
is evident from f > 157, the pure phase of ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2 (2) is
one of the most frustrated spin systems discovered to date. Of
consequence to RVB, this spin frustration occurs in a layered
1
kagome´ S ) /2 spin system. The foregoing results show that this
long-sought spin lattice is achieved when the interstitial sites of
kagome´ layers composed of Cu3(OH)6 triangles are solely occupied
by diamagnetic Zn(II) ions. Characterization of Zn[Cu3(OH)6Cl2]
by neutron scattering is underway.
Acknowledgment. We thank NSF for providing B.M.B. and
E.A.N. with predoctoral fellowships, DuPont for providing B.M.B.
with a Graduate Fellowship Award, Mr. K. Matan for experimental
assistance, and Prof. Y. S. Lee and Drs. F. C. Chou and A. Prodi
for helpful discussions.
Figure 2. (a) Low temperature dependence of øM for compounds in the
solid solution ZnxCu4-x(OH)6Cl2 for x ) 0 (2), 0.50 (blue, 9), 0.66 (green,
[), and 1.00 (red, b) as measured under ZFC conditions at 100 Oe (inset,
x ) 0). Lines shown to guide the eye. (b) Dependence of |ΘCW| on interlayer
Zn site occupancy; the additional point is for x ) 0.80 (O).
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic protocol and mag-
netic characterization of ZnxCu4-x(OH)6Cl2 (0 e x e 1); crystallographic
tables for ZnxCu4-x(OH)6Cl2 (x ) 0.33, 0.42, 1.00) (pdf). Full X-ray
crystallographic information, in CIF format. This material is available
Zn-paratacamites were prepared by hydrothermal synthesis ac-
cording to the following:
3Cu2(OH)2CO3 + 2MCl2 + 3H2O f
2M{Cu3(OH)6}Cl2 + 3CO2 (1)
References
(1) Anderson, P. W. Science 1987, 235, 1196.
where M ) Cu and/or Zn. By varying the Cu/Zn stoichiometry,
microcrystalline samples of the entire 0 e x e 1 series can be
prepared, with the end members (x ) 0) and (x ) 1) formed by
the exclusive use of MCl2 ) CuCl2 and ZnCl2, respectively. Full
experimental details are provided in the Supporting Information.
As Figure 2a shows, the magnetic susceptibility of 2 is distinct
from that of its Cu-substituted congeners. Cu[Cu3(OH)6Cl2] shows
a ferromagnetic transition with a critical temperature, TC ) 6.5 K.
As Zn(II) ions are substituted onto the interlayer site, a ferromag-
netic transition is maintained, but TC decreases. At full Zn(II)
occupancy, no magnetic ordering is observed for 2. Fits of the high
temperature inverse susceptibility data to the Curie-Weiss law yield
large negative ΘCW values (see Figures S3 and S4, Supporting
Information), which are indicative of an antiferromagnetic exchange
interaction for nearest-neighbor moments. As shown in Figure 2b,
|ΘCW| increases monotonically as more Zn is incorporated into the
interlayer site; the strongest nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic
coupling is observed for 2 (ΘCW ) -314 K).
(2) (a) Ramirez, A. P. Annu. ReV. Mater. Sci. 1994, 24, 453. (b) Schiffer, P.;
Ramirez, A. P. Comments Condens. Matter Phys. 1996, 18, 21. (c)
Greedan, J. E. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 37.
(3) (a) Waldtmann, C.; Everts, H. U.; Brenu, B.; Lhuillier, C.; Sindzingre,
P.; Lecheminant, P.; Pierre, L. Eur. Phys. J. B 1998, 2, 501. (b) Mambrini,
M.; Mila, F. Eur. Phys. J. B 2000, 17, 651. (c) Hastings, M. B. Phys.
ReV. B 2001, 63, 014413. (d) Lhullier, C. In LANL Preprint ArchiVe,
Condens. Matt. 2005, arXiv: cond-mat/ 0502464/1.
(4) Lhuillier, C. G.; Misguich, G. Lect. Notes Phys. 2002, 595, 161.
(5) (a) Nocera, D. G.; Bartlett, B. M.; Grohol, D.; Shores, M. P. Chem. Eur.
J. 2004, 10, 3850. (b) Grohol, D.; Nocera, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 2640.
(6) (a) Grohol, D.; Nocera, D. G.; Papoutsakis, D. Phys. ReV. B 2003, 67,
064401/1. (b) Grohol, D.; Matan, K.; Cho, J.-H.; Lee, S.-H.; Lynn, J. W.;
Nocera, D. G.; Lee, Y. S. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 323. (c) Bartlett, B. M.;
Nocera, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8985.
(7) Jambor, J. L.; Dutrizac, J. E.; Roberts, A. C.; Grice, J. D.; Szymanski, J.
T. Can. Mineral. 1996, 34, 61.
(8) Burns, P. C.; Cooper, M. A.; Hawthorne, F. C. Can. Mineral. 1995, 33,
633.
(9) Grice, J. D.; Szymanski, J. T.; Jambor, J. L. Can. Mineral. 1996, 34, 73.
(10) Braithwaite, R. S. W.; Mereiter, K.; Paar, W. H.; Clark, A. M. Mineral.
Mag. 2004, 68, 527.
(11) Hamilton, W. C. Acta Crystallogr. 1965, 18, 502.
(12) (a) Goodenough, J. B. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1958, 6, 287. (b) Kanamori,
J. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1959, 10, 87.
(13) Crawford, W. H.; Richardson, H. W.; Wasson, J. R.; Hodgson, D. J.;
Hatfield, W. E. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15, 2107.
The observed magnetism of the MCu3(OH)6Cl2 series may be
understood by a Goodenough-Kanamori analysis12 of a Cu-O-
Cu superexchange pathway. Within the kagome´ layers, a Cuintra
-
JA053891P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 39, 2005 13463