Please do not adjust margins
Dalton Transactions
Page 4 of 4
DOI: 10.1039/C7DT04355D
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
radius of the CdS/g-C
3
N
4
was smaller than that of RT CdS/g-C
3
N
4
, g- 11 Y. Xia, K. D. Gilroy, H. Peng and X. Xia, Chem., Int. Ed, 2017, 56,
0-95.
6
C
3
N
4
and CdS. which indicates the higher efficiency of photoinduced
1
1
1
2 J. Lee, J. Yang, S. G. Kwon, T. Hyeon, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1.
3 J. Chu, X. Li and J. Qi, CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 1881-1884.
4 F. Xiao, J. Miao and B. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2014, 136, 1559-
1569.
electron-hole pairs through an interfacial interaction between g-
32-34
C
3
N
4
and the CdS quantum dots
.
Fig. S12 showed the schematic illustration of the CdS/g-C
3 4
N
photocatalytic mechanism. Because of suitable match overlapping 15 H. Lin, Y. Li, H. Li and X. Wang, Nano Res. , 2017, 10, 1377-1392.
1
6 G. Yu, L. Geng, S. Wu, W. Yan and G. Liu, Nat. Commun. 2015,
band structures and similarly contacted interfaces, photoexcited
electrons in the CB of g-C can immediately move to the CB of
CdS. In the same time, photoexcited holes in the VB of CdS
spontaneously move to the VB of g-C . The mechanism of
5
1, 10676-10679.
3 4
N
1
7 H. Wang, S. Xu, C. Tsai, Y. Li, C. Liu, J. Zhao, Y. Liu, H. Yuan, F.
Abild-Pedersen, F. B. Prinz, J. K. Norskov and Y. Cui, Science,
2016, 354, 1031-1036.
3 4
N
hydrogen evolution over the composite material was presented in 18 J. M. Woods, Y. Jung, Y. Xie, W. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Wang and J. J. Cha,
ACS Nano, 2016, 10, 2004-2009.
2
Fig. S12a. As a consequence, L-ascrobic acid (H A) adhering on the
1
9 S. F. Tan, G. Lin, M. Bosman, U. Mirsaidov and C. A. Nijhuis, ACS
Nano, 2016, 10, 7689-7695.
0 R. Viswanatha, D. M. Battaglia, M. E. Curtis, T. D. Mishima, M. B.
Johnson and X. Peng, Nano Res. 2008, 1, 138-144.
g-C
3 4
N surface can be oxidized by photoinduced holes. On the
surface of Pt nanoparticles, the separated electrons will have
2
+
2
enough time to induce H to H . Fig S12b showed the process of
degradation of RhB. The adsorbed dissolved oxygen could generate 21 Y. Xu, Z. Fu, S. Cao, Y. Chen and W. Fu, Catal.L Sci. Technol., 2017,
2
−
7, 587-595.
•O
free radicals, due to the photogenerated electrons transferred
2
2
2 X. Wang, J. Cheng, H. Yu and J. Yu, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46, 6417-
to the surface of composite. Meanwhile, active •OH radicals were
6
424.
+
produced by H
2
O splitting. When h moved from the VB of the g-
3 J. Liu, Y. Liu, N. Liu, Y. Han, X. Zhang, H. Huang, Y. Lifshitz, S. Lee,
J. Zhong and Z. Kang, Science, 2015, 347, 970-974.
+
3 4
C N
and CdS, both h and •OH free radicals can transform from RhB
into products.
24 W. Ong, L. Tan, Y. H. Ng, S. Yong and S. Chai, Chem. Rev., 2016,
16, 7159-7329.
1
Conclusions
2
5 S. Cao, Y. Yuan, J. Fang, M. M. Shahjamali, F. Y. C. Boey, J. Barber,
S. C. J. Loo and C. Xue, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 1258-
In summary, a facile ultra-low-temperature reaction approach was
developed to synthesize CdS quantum dots supported on g-C
nanosheets. The resulting CdS/g-C
high photocatalytic performance for H
of RhB. The synthesized nanocomposites with 4.5wt% CdS quantum
3 4
N
1
266.
3 4
N nanocomposites exhibited 26 Y. Pan, T. Zhou, J. Han, J. Hong, Y. Wang, W. Zhang and R. Xu,
Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6, 2206-2213.
2
production and degradation
2
2
7 I. Nikitskiy, S. Goossens, D. Kufer, T. Lasanta, G. Navickaite, F. H.
L. Koppens and G. Konstantatos, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7.
8 X. Chen, X. Huang, L. Kong, Z. Guo, X. Fu, M. Li and J. Liu, J.
Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 352-359.
-
1 -1
dots displayed a H
9 times higher than pure g-C
after 4 cycles. Meanwhile, CdS/g-C
2
evolution rate of 4.967 mmol h g , which was
5
3 4
N
and could retain over 90% activity
3 4
N nanocomposites displayed a 29 G. Liu, P. Niu, C. Sun, S. C. Smith, Z. Chen, G. Q. M. Lu and H.
degradation rate of 89.5% for RhB solution in 75 min and could
retain over 95% activity after 5 cycles. This study may inspire the
development an approach for the synthesis of CdS quantum dots
and their potential for photocatalystic applications.
Cheng, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2010, 132, 11642-11648.
0 Q. Fan, Y. Huang, C. Zhang, J. Liu, L. Piao, Y. Yu, S. Zuo and B. Li,
Catal. Today 2016, 264, 250-256.
3
3
3
1 S. Weng, B. Chen, L. Xie, Z. Zheng and P. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A,
2
013, 1, 3068-3075.
2 Y. Cui , G. Zhang, Z. Lin, X. Wang, Appl. Catal., B, 2016, 181, 413-
19.
4
Conflicts of interest
33 Y. Wang, H. Wang, F. Chen, F. Cao, X. Zhao, S. Meng, Y. Cui, Appl.
Catal., B,, 2017 206, 417-425.
There are no conflicts to declare
Notes and references
1
S. J. Lim, M. U. Zahid, P. Le, L. Ma, D. Entenberg, A. S. Harney, J.
Condeelis and A. M. Smith, Nat. Commun. 2015, 6.
N. S. Lewis, Science, 2016, 351.
I. L. Medintz, M. H. Stewart, S. A. Trammell, K. Susumu, J. B.
Delehanty, B. C. Mei, J. S. Melinger, J. B. Blanco-Canosa, P. E.
Dawson and H. Mattoussi, Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 676-684.
Y. Gao and X. Peng, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2014, 136, 6724-6732.
M. Yuan, M. Liu and E. H. Sargent, Nat. Energy 2016, 1.
Z. A. Peng and X. G. Peng, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3343-
2
3
4
5
6
3353.
7
8
9
1
K. D. Gilroy, J. Puibasset, M. Vara and Y. Xia, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed, 2017, 56, 8647-8651.
T. Zhu, B. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Lu, H. Fan, N. Rowell, J. A.
Ripmeester, S. Han and K. Yu, Chem. Rev, 2017, 29, 5727-5735.
N. T. K. Thanh, N. Maclean and S. Mahiddine, Chem. Rev, 2014,
1
14, 7610-7630.
0 Y. Xia, Y. Xiong, B. Lim and S. E. Skrabalak, Chem., Int. Ed, 2009,
8, 60-103.
4
4
| J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins