Q. Li et al.
Catalysis Communications 156 (2021) 106321
photo-thermal-catalytic effect.
with GC-TCD (the carrier gas was N
was performed to detect the evolution amount of hydrogen. In a typical
test, the as-prepared catalyst (20 mg), NaOH (1000 mg) and NaBH
4
2
) and a 5A molecular sieve column
Here, the work was concerned with applying photocatalyst to NaBH
4
hydrolysis reaction. Zn
for the potential material as the high chemical stability. Moreover, the
electronic configuration of Zn GeO allowed excellent mobility for the
photogenerated electron-hole pairs [25]. A series of Zn
0 to 0.10) solid-solutions were obtain via a simple solvothermal
2
GeO
4
, an excellent photocatalyst was selected
(300 mg) were added into a three-neck Pyrex quartz glass vessel (150
mL). The reaction system kept vacuum for 20 min. Then, de-gased
deionized (20 mL) water was injected into the glass vessel through the
rubber plug by an injector. All the feed reactants were dispersed well by
magnetically stirring. The temperature of the reactor vessel was main-
2
4
:xFe3 (x
+
GeO
4
2
=
method. Compared with mono-energy driven condition, the H
2
evolu-
:xFe3 (x = 0 to 0.05) solid-solutions in photo-
+
tained at the range of 10 to 40 C by programmed-control system. UV-
◦
tion rate for Zn
2
GeO
4
thermal-driven condition could be improved for several times. It was
verified to certain that the synergistically photo-thermo-catalytic effect
light and visible-light irradiation were provided by CEL-M500 mer-
cury lamp (AuLight, 500 W) and CEL-LED100HA lamp (AuLight, 100
W), respectively.
of Zn
2
GeO
4
for H
2
evolution in NaBH
4
hydrolysis reaction. As the
representative samples, Zn
2
GeO afforded the H
4
2
evolution rate of 5.45
ꢀ 1
ꢀ 1
◦
mmol⋅h ⋅g
under UV-light irradiation at 40 C. Besides,
3. Result and discussion
:0.05Fe3 exhibited the H
+
evolution rate of 2.93 mmol⋅h ⋅g
ꢀ 1 ꢀ 1
Zn
2
GeO
4
2
◦
at 40 C under visible-light irradiation. This work demonstrated that
3.1. Characterization of catalysts
NaBH
4
hydrolysis reaction could be catalyzed via photocatalyst by the
synergistical photo-thermal-catalysis.
The XRD patterns of the as-obtained samples confirmed Zn GeO :
2
4
xFe3 (x = 0 to 0.1) samples with fine crystallinity via solvothermal
+
2
. Experimental
preparation method (See Fig. 1). The diffraction peaks of bare-Zn GeO
2
4
and low Fe3 doped Zn
+
GeO
(x = 0.01 to 0.05) samples were almost the
2
4
2
.1. Materials
same without any signal of impurity phase. However, it was quite
obvious that there existed an impurity phase peak in the pattern of 10
atom% Fe3 -doped Zn GeO . Zn GeO is composed of two different
+
The reagents in this work were commercial reagents which without
2
4
2
4
further purification. Zn(CH
O were commercial analytical pure grade (99.9%, Aladdin Chemical
Reagent Corp.). GeO was commercial high purity grade (99.999%,
3
COO)
2
, Fe(NO
3
)
3
⋅9H
2
O, NaBH
4
, NaOH and
tetrahedra (ZnO4 and GeO ) which bridged by O atoms with the space
4
D
2
group of R-3 (See the inset of Fig. 1). According to the data of ionic
3
+
2+
2
radius, the effective ionic radius of Fe ion (0.49 Å) is smaller than Zn
ion (0.60 Å), but larger than Ge4 ion (0.39 Å) in four-coordinated
+
Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd). Ethylenediamine was com-
mercial analytical pure grade (99.5%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent
3
+
environment [26]. For the balance of electric charges, Fe ion have
to replace both Ge4 ion and Zn ion sites respectively, forming dis-
+
2+
2
Corp.). Nitrogen (N ), helium (He) were high pure grade (6 N, Yuanneng
Biotechnology Co., Ltd.).
torted molecular framework geometry. Therefore, the molecular
framework of Zn
2
GeO
4
could not tolerate a higher doping content of
3
+
3+
2
.2. Preparation of photocatalysts
Fe ion. The crystal parameters of Zn GeO :xFe (x = 0 to 0.05)
2
4
samples were estimated by Rietveld refinement method and the minor
error factors indicated reliable results (See Table S1 in the Supplemen-
tary material). It should be noticed that the value of a, c and V were
:xFe3 (x = 0 to 0.10) catalysts were obtained by sol-
+
Zn
2
GeO
4
vothermal method. In
CH COO)
a typical synthesized, stoichiometric Zn
3
+
(
3
2
(1 mmol), GeO
2
and Fe(NO
3
)
3
⋅9H
2
O were mixed with
expanded with doping concentration of Fe ion, confirming the effec-
+
tive doping of Fe3 ion into the Zn GeO framework.
2 4
deionized water (3 mL) and ethylenediamine (6 mL) into a stainless
autoclave. The aggregate amounts of Ge4 ion and Fe ion cations were
+
3+
3+
The morphologies of the as-obtained Zn GeO :xFe solid-solutions
2
4
◦
0
.5 mmol. The mixture was stirring for one hour at 80 C to form a
(x = 0 to 0.05) were observed via SEM measurements. Fig. 2 displayed
homogeneous viscous colloid. Subsequently, the autoclave maintained
that all the products exhibited flower-like morphology composed of
◦
at 180 C for 10 h. Ultimately, the as-obtained precipitate was washed
nanobelts with 3–4
μ
m in length and several nanometers in width. The
for several time with warm deionized water. The desired product was
high resolution TEM images (See Fig. 3) presented distinct morphologies
◦
3+
obtained after drying at 80 C for several hours.
of Zn GeO and Zn GeO :0.05Fe , which confirmed the Zn GeO :
2
+
4
2
4
2
4
3
xFe nanobelts with about 20 nm in width. Raul [27] et al. reported
2
.3. Characterization devices
that the pH-value and GeO content in the initial solution were relevant
2
to the morphologies of Zn
2 4
GeO . This work was not concerned about the
3
+
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were obtained by a Philips
morphology control of Zn GeO . As a typical sample, Zn GeO :0.05Fe
2
4
2
4
PANanlytical X'Pert XRD system (Cu Ka radiation, 45 kV, 40 mA, λ =
.5418 Å). The morphologies of as-prepared catalyst were carried out by
was chosen for EDS analysis and element mapping investigation. The
images demonstrated the atoms of Zn, Fe, Ge and O were homogeneous
1
3
+
FEI Quanta 450FEG field emission scanning electron microscope system
and JEM-2100F field emission transmission electron microscope system.
The specific surface area was determined by using BET method on a
distributed on the surface of Zn GeO :0.05Fe (See Fig. 2).
2 4
3
+
The specific surface areas of the obtained Zn GeO :xFe (x = 0 to
2
4
0.05) samples were measured by BET nitrogen absorption method. The
BET plots (Fig. S1) demonstrated that the catalysts obtained via sol-
Quantachrome Quadrasorb SI N
2
adsorption-desorption analyzer at 77
◦
2
ꢀ 1
K. All the as-synthesized materials were degassed at 280 C for 2 days.
UV–Visible diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were measured by a Shi-
madzu UV-3600 UV–Vis-NIR spectrometer (λ = 200–800 nm) equipped
with an integrating sphere. The background noise of the spectrometer
vothermal method exhibited minor specific surface areas (2–3 m ⋅g ).
The results were consistent with the observations from FESEM analyses.
To determine the chemical valence state of the ions in the as-
obtained samples, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried
3
+
3+
was corrected by BaSO
4
. Axis Ultra Imaging XPS Spectrometer was
out on Zn GeO :0.01Fe as the representative of Zn GeO :xFe (x =
2
4
2
4
employed to obtain X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectrum.
0 to 0.05) samples (See Fig. 4). The high-resolution XPS revealed the
characteristic binding energy peaks of Zn, Ge and Fe ions from the test
sample (See the inset of Fig. 4). The characteristic peaks located at
2
.4. Catalytic hydrogen evolution tests
4
+
1
221.2 eV and 1252.4 eV were belonged to the orbits for Ge ion (Ge
The catalytic hydrogen evolution tests were performed in an evac-
2p1/2 and Ge 2p3/2, respectively) [28]. Besides, the characteristic peaks
of Zn2 ions which located at 1045.6 eV (Zn 2p1/2) and 1022.5 eV (Zn
+
uation AuLight CEL-PAEM-D8 photo-thermal characterization system.
An online automatic Shimadzu GC-8A gas chromatograph equipped
2p3/2), respectively [28]. In the right inset of Fig. 2, the two weak peaks
2