C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 2. UV-vis difference absorption spectral changes observed in the
reduction of O (0.13 mM) by 3 (red line, 0.10 mM) in the presence of
HCOOH/HCOONa (0.10 M) in H O at pH 5.2 at 298 K.
2
2
Figure 3. Time course of the turnover number (TON) of the H
in the decomposition of HCOOH/HCOONa (0.83 M) catalyzed by 1 (0.5
mM) in deaerated (freeze-pump-thaw cycles, 5 times) H O (O) and in
aerated H O (b) at pH 3.6 at 298 K.
2
evolution
Scheme 1
2
2
by freeze-pump-thaw cycles (5 times), no induction period was
observed as shown in Figure 3 (O). O dissolved in the reaction solution
and in the head space (total 6.0 µmol) was completely eliminated (TON
5.0, [O ] < 1 ppb in solution below the detection limit of an oxygen
electrode: YSI Model 5300A) after 150 min in the decomposition of
formic acid in aerated H O. Essentially the same slope of the plots in
Figure 3 after O removal implies the robustness of the complex 1 in
the catalytic O reduction.
In summary, we have achieved the efficient four-electron
reduction of O with formic acid in water at ambient temperature
2
)
2
2
2
2
2
by using complex 1, which is the most effective catalyst for
hydrogen generation in the decomposition of formic acid in water
6
Judging from such kinetic behaviors of the intermediates, three well-
resolved steps for the reaction of 3 with O are proposed as given
by eqs 4-6. First, 3 reacts with O to give the peroxo complex
A) (eq 4). The O-O bond of the peroxo complex (A) is
at room temperature. The complete deoxygenation of water ([O
2
]
< 1 ppb) has been achieved successfully. The four-electron reduction
of O is suggested to proceed via an iridium(III)-peroxo complex
and an iridium(V)-oxo complex, both of which are regarded as the
2
2
2
(
9
heterolytically cleaved to produce the Ir(V)-oxo complex (B)
key intermediates in Ir catalyzed water oxidation.
+
irrespective of the concentration of H at a pH higher than 4.2 (eq
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid
Nos. 20108010 and 21550061) from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan, and by KOSEF/
MEST through WCU Project R31-2008-000-10010-0.
-
5
). B reacts with HCOO to yield 1 and CO
2
(eq 6). The formation
(
of an iridium-peroxo complex by the reaction of a low-valent
7
2
iridium complex with O has previously been reported. The
formation of an iridium(V)-oxo complex with cleavage of the O-O
8
bond of an iridium(III)-peroxo complex has also been reported.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
figures (S1-S3). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
at http://pubs.acs.org.
In addition, the observed spectrum (green line in Figure 2) agrees
with the authentic spectrum of an iridium(V)-oxo complex (B) (λmin
)
410 nm, 590 nm) generated by the addition of peracetic acid
(
CH C(O)OOH) to a water solution of complex 1 (Figure S3).
3
References
I 2+
III
- 2+
(1) Cohen, P. The ASME Handbook on Water Technology for Thermal Power
Systems; The American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, 1989;
p 1291.
[
Ir
]
(3) + O f
[
Ir sOO
]
(A)
(4)
(5)
2
III
- 2+
+
V
4+
-
(2) Gross, M. S.; Pisarello, M. L.; Pierpauli, K. A.; Querini, C. A. Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 81.
[
Ir sOO
]
+ H f Ir dO
(B) + OH
[
2]
(
3) Moon, J.-S.; Park, K.-K.; Kim, J.-H.; Seo, G. Appl. Catal., A 2000, 201, 81.
4) Van der Vaart, R.; Hafkamp, B.; Koele, P. J.; Querreveld, M.; Jansen, A. E.;
Volkov, V. V.; Lebedeva, V. I.; Gryaznov, V. M. Ultrapure Water 2001, 18,
(
V
III
4+
[
Ir dO]4+ + HCOOH f Ir sOH
(1) + CO2
[
2]
2
7.
(
6)
(
5) Van der Vaart, R.; Lebedeva, V. I.; Petrova, I. V.; Plyasova, L. M.; Rudina,
N. A.; Kochubey, D. I.; Tereshchenko, G. F.; Volkov, V. V.; van Erkel, J.
J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 299, 38.
Based on the above results, the overall catalytic cycle of the four-
electron reduction of O
The hydride complex 2, which is produced by the reaction of 1 with
HCOO (eq 1), deprotonates to generate the low-valent complex 3.
-
(6) The catalytic decomposition of formic acid to hydrogen and CO with 1 has
by HCOO with 1 is shown in Scheme 1.
2
2
been reported: Fukuzumi, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Suenobu, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2
010, 132, 1496.
-
(7) (a) Vaska, L. Science 1963, 140, 809. (b) Vaska, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1976,
, 175. (c) Suardi, G.; Cleary, B. P.; Duckett, S. B.; Sleigh, C.; Rau, M.;
9
I
The Ir complex 3 reacts with O
2
to produce the iridium(V)-oxo
Reed, E. W.; Lohman, J. A. B.; Eisenberg, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
7716. (d) Williams, D. B.; Kaminsky, W.; Mayer, J. M.; Goldberg, K. I.
Chem. Commun. 2008, 4195.
complex (B) and water via formation of the iridium(III)-peroxo complex
A). The oxo complex (B) reacts with HCOOH to reproduce 1.
The catalytic four-electron reduction of O with formic acid proceeds
during an induction period observed for the hydrogen evolution reaction
in the decomposition of formic acid catalyzed by 1 in aerated water
(
(
8) (a) Hay-Motherwell, R. S.; Wilkinson, G.; Hussain-Bates, B.; Hursthouse,
M. B. Polyhedron 1993, 12, 2009. (b) Jacobi, B. G.; Laitar, D. S.; Pu, L.;
Wargocki, M. F.; DiPasquale, A. G.; Fortner, K. C.; Schuck, S. M.; Brown,
S. N. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 4815.
2
(9) The more definitive assignment of the intermediates is now in progress.
2
as shown in Figure 3 (b). When O in water was completely removed
JA104486H
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 132, NO. 34, 2010 11867