Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.7 (2004)
813
and can be seen to be arranged uniformly over the sample except
for a few holes in which the Au metal was not fully deposited.
The average diameter of the Au disks as estimated from the
SEM observation was 46.2 nm. The high-resolution image (b)
of the Au disk surface confirms that it is clean and uniform.
On the other hand, in the image of the Au disk array on which
the ferritin molecules adsorbed (Figure 3), the ferritin molecules
are observed as brighter spots because of the ferric oxide
core.9,10 The figure shows that many ferritin molecules are ad-
sorbed selectively on the Au disks to form a clearly defined array
of ferritin with a Au disk arrangement, while very few ferritin
molecules are adsorbed onto the surrounding alumina. The se-
lective adsorption of ferritin onto the Au disk is thus confirmed
to occur. From the SEM image of Figure 3, three to five bright
spots, due to the ferric core of the ferritin molecules, can be ob-
served on each Au disk. The SEM images in Figure 4 show the
dependence of the amount of adsorbed ferritin on the concentra-
tion of ferritin in the modification solution. The extent of adsorp-
tion depends strongly on the concentration of ferritin. At a ferri-
tin concentration of 0.125 mgꢂmLꢃ1, a few ferritin molecules
adsorb onto the Au disk. The Au disk onto which ferritin mole-
cules do not adsorb can also be observed. On the other hand, at a
ferritin concentration of more than 0.5 mgꢂmLꢃ1, ferritin adsorbs
not only onto the Au disk but also onto the surrounding alumina.
A number of ferritin molecules are strongly attracted by ferritin
adsorbed onto the Au disk surface with van der Waals attraction
between molecules. Ferritin layers larger than the Au disks are
formed on the Au disk array. It is difficult to form a ferritin array
with the size coincided with one of the Au disk at a ferritin con-
centration of more than 0.5 mgꢂmLꢃ1. The trend in the surface
coverage with modification time is similar. At a modification
time of more than 30 min, ferritin molecules start to adsorb onto
the alumina. A modification time of 30 min and a ferritin concen-
tration of 0.25 mgꢂmLꢃ1 are therefore considered most suitable
for achieving a well-separated arrangement of ferritin. More-
over, the amount of adsorbed ferritin on the Au disks was sensi-
tive to the change in pH of the modification solutions. Selective
adsorption of ferritin onto the Au disk could not be observed in
the acidic solution with a pH of less than 6.5 and an alkaline so-
(a)
(b)
100 nm
100 nm
Figure 4. Typical SEM images of ferritin molecules adsorbed
onto the Au disk array with a disk diameter of 46 nm and disk
period of 63 nm. Modification with ferritin was performed by
immersion in (a) 0.125 and (b) 0.5 mgꢂmLꢃ1 ferritin phosphate
buffer solutions (pH 8.0) for 30 min.
lution with a pH of more than 9. The adsorption behavior of fer-
ritin onto the Au disk surface may be attributed to the surface
charge of the ferritin molecule and the porous alumina substrate.
Therefore, the control of the concentration of ferritin, immersion
time in the modification solution, and solution pH are important
in the fabrication of a biomolecular array of regular size and ar-
rangement.
In conclusion, an ordered array of ferritin molecule using a
Au nanodisk array, which has a disk period and diameter of
nanometer sizes, was fabricated using a highly ordered anodic
porous alumina substrate. Ferritin was confirmed by scanning
electron microscopy to adsorb selectively onto the Au disk by
controlling the modification time and ferritin concentration in
the modification solution. The process used here has the advant-
age that the size and shape of the Au disk array is highly control-
lable, and thus it allows for the preparation of biomolecular ar-
rays having various shapes, sizes, and spot spacing. Further
reductions in disk area and spacing could lead to high-density,
highly ordered isolated biomolecular arrays for the analysis of
signal transduction and molecular electronics.
References
1
2
M. Schena, Science, 270, 467 (1995).
J. F. Mooney, A. J. Hunt, J. R. McIntosh, C. A. Liberko,
D. M. Walba, and C. T. Rogers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A., 93, 12287 (1996).
3
4
5
6
N. V. Avseenko, T. Y. Morozova, F. I. Ataullakhanov, and
V. N. Morozov, Anal. Chem., 74, 927 (2002).
A. S. Blawas and W. M. Reichert, Biomaterials, 19, 595
(1998).
H. D. Inerowicz, S. Howell, F. E. Regnier, and R.
Reifenberger, Langmuir, 18, 5263 (2002).
K. Wadu-Mesthrige, N. A. Amro, J. C. Carno, S. Xu, and
G.-Y. Liu, Biophys. J., 80, 1891 (2001).
7
8
H. Masuda and K. Fukuda, Science, 268, 146 (1995).
H. Masuda, H. Yamada, M. Satoh, H. Asoh, M. Nakao, and
T. Tamamura, Appl. Phys. Lett., 71, 2770 (1997).
P. M. Proulx-Curry and N. D. Chasteen, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
144, 347 (1995).
9
50 nm
10 I. Yamashita, Thin Solid Films, 393, 12 (2001).
11 H. Masuda, F. Hasegawa, and S. Ono, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
144, L127 (1997).
12 P. Forrer, F. Schlottig, H. Siegenthaler, and M. Textor,
J. Appl. Electrochem., 30, 533 (2000).
Figure 3. Typical SEM image of ferritin molecules adsorbed
onto the Au disk array with a disk diameter of 46 nm and disk
period of 63 nm. Modification with ferritin was performed by
immersion in 0.25 mgꢂmLꢃ1 ferritin phosphate buffer solutions
(pH 8.0) for 30 min.
Published on the web (Advance View) June 7, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.812