132904-3
Timm et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 132904 ͑2010͒
The stoichiometry of the native oxide is obtained from
the relative heights of the oxide peaks in In 3d and As 3d
reference spectra acquired at the same kinetic energy of the
photoelectrons, amounting to 62Ϯ5% In-oxide ͓see Fig.
3͑a͔͒. By simulating the relative oxide and bulk peak sizes
for each spectrum, the thickness of the native oxide film is
obtained, which varies between 1.1 and 1.4 nm in the differ-
ent reference samples. The As-oxide consists to about 80%
of arsenic with the oxidation state +3, as in As2O3, and to
about 20% of As5+, which can be assumed to As2O5 or the
mixed oxide InAsO4.18–20 InAsO4 as well as the stable In-
oxide is In2O3 consist of In3+. Since another In oxidation
In conclusion, we have studied the thickness and com-
position of the native oxide film on InAs. Strong oxide re-
duction is obtained by thin ALD films of Al2O3 or HfO2,
especially for As-oxides. These results underline the highly
promising perspective for InAs MOS devices and contribute
to an improved understanding of the complex processes tak-
ing place at the semiconductor high- interface.
The authors acknowledge the valuable discussion with
Professor R. M. Wallace ͑UT Dallas͒ as well as substantial
support by K. Schulte at the MAX-lab synchrotron facility.
This work was performed within the Nanometer Structure
Consortium at Lund University, and was supported by the
Swedish Research Council ͑VR͒, the Swedish Foundation
for Strategic Research ͑SSF͒, the Crafoord Foundation, and
the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.
state is additionally observed, also In2O ͑with In1+͒ or InO
͑with In2+͒ could be present in the native oxide. Instead, also
the existence of a single phase metastable nonstoichiometric
oxide with microscopic units of different As and In oxidation
states could well explain the observed data.18 Calculations of
the Gibbs energy of formation have shown that InAsO4 and
In2O3 are energetically much more favorable than As2O3 or
As2O5,20 explaining the excess of In-oxide.
1M. Houssa, E. Chagarov, and A. Kummel, MRS Bull. 34, 504 ͑2009͒.
2G. K. Dalapati, Y. Tong, W.-Y. Loh, H. K. Mun, and B. J. Cho, IEEE
4E. J. Kim, L. Wang, P. M. Asbeck, K. C. Saraswat, and P. C. McIntyre,
At the InAs/high- interface, the stoichiometry of the
oxide has changed to about 90% In-oxide, as shown in Fig.
3͑a͒. It has been reported that already the first cycle of Al2O3
deposition reduces most of the native oxide on GaAs,7,9
while on InAs an In-oxide peak related to In1+ remains.14
However, when we repeated our XPS measurements on ex-
actly the same InAs/HfO2 and InAs/Al2O3 samples after
several months, a much larger amount of both As- and In-
oxides was observed, showing a reoxidation through the only
2 nm thick high- films under ambient conditions. Thus,
already the originally measured interfacial oxide might be
partly due to reoxidation after the sample preparation.
For high- layers deposited at standard temperatures of
250 °C for HfO2 and 350 °C for Al2O3, no signs of alumi-
num or hafnium binding to indium or arsenic are observed in
the corresponding spectra. Varying the HfO2 deposition tem-
perature to either 150 or 350 °C slightly decreases the oxide
reduction but does not qualitatively alter the resulting spec-
tra. The temperature of the Al2O3 deposition, however, is
found to be of strong importance. Figures 3͑b͒ and 3͑c͒ show
As 3d and In 3d spectra of an Al2O3 film deposited on InAs
at 200 °C. In the As 3d spectrum, a shoulder at the high
binding energy side of the InAs bulk peak is obvious, which
can be fitted as an additional doublet with a 0.4 eV larger
binding energy, indicating arsenic bonded to aluminum.21 In
the In 3d spectrum, the In-oxide peak is significantly smaller
than at the standard InAs/Al2O3 samples, reaching only 10%
of the reference oxide peak size ͓Fig. 3͑a͔͒. A possible ex-
planation for both results could be the formation of a thin
interfacial AlAs layer during ALD at this reduced tempera-
ture, which then protects ͑at least partly͒ the underlying InAs
from being reoxidized later on.
5R. M. Wallace, P. C. McIntyre, J. Kim, and Y. Nishi, MRS Bull. 34, 493
͑2009͒.
6C. L. Hinkle, M. Milojevic, B. Brennan, A. M. Sonnet, F. S. Aguirre-
94, 162101 ͑2009͒.
7H. D. Lee, T. Feng, L. Yu, D. Mastrogiovanni, A. Wan, T. Gustafsson, and
8M. Kobayashi, P. T. Chen, Y. Sun, N. Goel, P. Majhi, M. Garner, W. Tsai,
9M. Milojevic, F. S. Aguirre-Tostado, C. L. Hinkle, H. C. Kim, E. M.
10Silicon (Si), Electron Mobility; Gallium Arsenide (GaAs), Electron Mobil-
ity; Indium Arsenide (InAs), Carrier Mobilities, Landolt-Börnstein, New
Series, Group III, edited by O. Madelung, U. Rössler, and M. Schulz
͑Springer, New York, 2002͒.
11D. Wheeler, L.-E. Wernersson, L. Fröberg, C. Thelander, A. Mikkelsen,
K.-J. Weststrate, A. Sonnet, E. M. Vogel, and A. Seabaugh, Microelectron.
96, 233507 ͑2010͒.
13S. Roddaro, K. Nilsson, G. Astromskas, L. Samuelson, L.-E. Wernersson,
202905 ͑2010͒.
17L. O. Olsson, L. Ilver, J. Kanski, P. O. Nilsson, C. B. M. Andersson, U. O.
Karlsson, and M. C. Håkansson, Phys. Rev. B 53, 4734 ͑1996͒.
18G. Hollinger, R. Skheyta-Kabbani, and M. Gendry, Phys. Rev. B 49,
11159 ͑1994͒.
19D. Y. Petrovykh, M. J. Yang, and L. J. Whitman, Surf. Sci. 523, 231
͑2003͒.
213 ͑1982͒.
142.134.145.190 On: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:07:58