reducing agent (NH3 : BH3) which has previously been shown
to be effective.8 In this case we chose to use enantiomerically
pure (2R,3R)-3 and (2S,3R)-3 as substrates and successfully
conversion to (2RS,4S)-6 (66% yield; > 99% e.e. and d.e.). The
-AAO catalysed oxidation of (2R,4S)-6 proceeded rapidly
suggesting that the presence of a g-methyl group has relatively
little effect on the reaction rate compared to simple a-amino
acids.
D
interconverted the pair of diastereoisomers using
D
-AAO from
porcine kidney and -AAO from snake venom (Scheme 3).
L
In addition to NH3 : BH3, catalytic transfer hydrogenation
(Pd/C–HCO2NH4) is also compatible with the oxidase reac-
tions.8 Both reagents were examined for their ability to convert
In conclusion we have developed a novel procedure for
interconverting b- and g-substituted a-amino acid diastereo-
isomers using amino acid oxidases in combination with a range
of chemical reducing agents. The procedure appears highly
versatile in that so far we have examined four different AAOs
and four different reducing agents and in all cases the reactions
proceeded in good to high yield and excellent stereoselectiv-
ities.
L
-isoleucine 4 to
D
-allo-isoleucine 5 in the presence of -AAO
L
from Proteus myxofaciens (Scheme 4). This enzyme has been
over-expressed in Escherichia coli15 and can be used either as a
whole cell biocatalyst or partially disrupted cells. The use of
NH3 : BH3 (40 equiv.) with disrupted cells yielded
D-allo-
isoleucine 5 in 87% yield and 99% d.e. whereas by comparison
Pd/C–HCO2NH4 with intact cells gave 5 in 61% yield and 96%
d.e. The use of snake venom -AAO with NH3 : BH3 resulted in
We are grateful to the BBSRC and GlaxoSmithKline (A.E.)/
DowPharma (G.R.) for CASE awards and to Great Lakes for a
postdoctoral fellowship (F-R.A.). We also acknowledge finan-
cial support from the Wellcome Trust.
L
a modest improvement (89% yield; > 99% d.e.).
Finally to further explore the range of substrates amenable to
stereoinversion, we examined g-substituted a-amino acids.
(2RS,4S)-2-Amino-4-methylhexanoic acid 6 was prepared by
alkylation of imine 716 using (S)-(+)-1-bromo-2-methylbutane 8
(e.e. > 98%) followed by hydrolysis (conc. HCl) to give
(2RS,4S)-6 in 65% yield and 88% d.e (Scheme 5). Treatment of
Notes and references
1 G. Toth, K. C. Russell, G. Landis, T. H. Kramer, L. Fang, R. Knapp, P.
Davis, T. F. Burks, H. I. Yamamura and V. J. Hruby, J. Med. Chem.,
1992, 35, 2384.
2 R. M. Williams, Synthesis of Optically Active a-Amino Acids, Pergamon
Press, Oxford, 1989.
6 with T. variabilis -AAO and NaCNBH3 resulted in rapid
D
3 E. Medina, A. Moyana, M. A. Pericàs and A. Riera, J. Org. Chem.,
1998, 63, 8574.
4 R. Dharanipragada, K. VanHulle, A. Bannister, S. Bear, L. Kennedy and
V. J. Hruby, Tetrahedron, 1992, 48, 4733.
5 For a recent review see: K. V. L. Crépy and T. Imamoto, Adv. Synth.
Catal., 2003, 345, 79.
6 M. J. Burk, M. F. Gross and J. P. Martinez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995,
117, 9375; M. J. Burk, K. M. Bedingfield, W. F. Kiesman and J. G.
Allen, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 3093; R. S. Hoerrner, D. Askin, R.
P. Volante and P. J. Reider, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 3455.
7 T. Beard and N. J. Turner, Chem. Commun, 2002, 246–247.
8 F.-R. Alexandre, D. P. Pantaleone, P. P. Taylor, I. G. Fotheringham, D.
J. Ager and N. J. Turner, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 707.
9 M. Alexeeva, A. Enright, M. J. Dawson, M. Mahmoudian and N. J.
Turner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 3177.
Scheme 3 Interconversion of (2R,3R)- and (2S,3R)-b-methylphenylalanine
3.
10 R. Carr, M. Alexeeva, A. Enright, T. S. C. Eve, M. J. Dawson and N. J.
Turner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, in press.
11 For a recent review on the kinetics and stereochemistry of deracemisa-
tion reactions see: U. T. Strauss, U. Felfer and K. Faber, Tetrahedron
Asymmetry, 1999, 10, 107.
12 The final e.e. of the product from a deracemisation reaction is
Scheme 4 Conversion of L-isoleucine 4 to D-allo-isoleucine 5.
determined by the ratio of rate constants k1/k2 for oxidation of the
D and
L
-enantiomers since the latter are in equilibrium via the imino acid.
Hence the e.e. is identical to that achieved by a standard kinetic
resolution process. The e.e. is also given by (E 2 1)/(E + 1) as for
dynamic kinetic resolutions: H. Stecher and K. Faber, Synthesis, 1997,
1.
13 For initial reports on the use of NaBH4 in the deracemisation of a-amino
acids see: E. W. Hafner and D. Wellner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
1971, 68, 987; J. W. Huh, K. Yokoigawa, N. Esaki and K. Soda, J.
Ferment. Bioeng., 1992, 74, 189; J. W. Huh, K. Yokoigawa, N. Esaki
and K. Soda, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 1992, 56, 2081.
14 J. A. Moreno, F. J. Montes, J. Catalán and M. A. Galán, Enzym. Microb.
Technol., 1996, 18, 379.
15 D. P. Pantaleone, A. M. Geller and P. P. Taylor, J. Mol. Catal. B:
Enzym., 2001, 11, 795.
16 M. J. O’Donnell, J. M. Boniece and S. E. Earp, Tetrahedron Lett., 1978,
19, 2641.
Scheme 5 Synthesis of (2S,4S)-4-methyl-2-aminohexanoic acid 6.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2636–2637
2637
Typeset and printed by Black Bear Press Limited, Cambridge, England