M.G. Teixeira et al.
CatalysisTodayxxx(xxxx)xxx–xxx
2. Material and methods
reacts with another alcohol molecule giving the intermediate (V),
which upon deprotonation forms the acetal (VI) and regenerates the H+
2.1. Chemicals
but generally it has been accepted that the rate determining step is the
formation of the cation from the protonated hemiacetal [31]. To com-
be sufficiently acidic to promote an effective protonation of any
hemiacetal formed, and sufficiently polar to allow the stabilization of
the cationic intermediate. However, the amount of acid must be con-
trolled since an excess of acid could also protonate the alcohol, dras-
tically reducing its nucleophilicity. In addition, an excess of acid favors
the hydrolysis of the acetal to aldehyde.
All the chemicals were of analytical reagent grade and were used as
such without any further purification, except for furfural. Hydrated
heteropolyacids (e.g. H3PW12O40 and H3PMo12O40; 99 wt. %) were
acquired from Sigma-Aldrich. Alcohols (e.g. methanol, ethanol, pro-
panol, propran-2-ol and butanol) having purity between 99.5 and
99.8 wt. %, were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Sulfuric, hydro-
chloric and p-toluene sulfonic acids (98 wt. %) were Vetec. Furfural was
purchased from Sigma and was freshly distilled under reduced pressure
and stored under an N2 atmosphere prior to use.
As can be observed in the mechanism of acetal formation (Scheme
1), all the steps are reversible; to avoid shifting equilibrium back to
reactants, a strategy commonly used is to remove the water by using
physical and chemical means [32].
2.2. Catalytic runs and products identification
Catalytic tests were carried in a glass reactor (25 mL) fitted with
sampling septum, under magnetic stirrer. In a typical procedure, acid
catalyst and the adequate alcohol were dissolved, and the reactor
temperature was adjusted to 298 K. Then, the reaction was started by
adding of furfural. The reactions were monitored taking aliquots at
regular time intervals (1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min) and analyzing
them by ultraviolet spectroscopy, in a double beam UV/vis spectro-
photometer (Micronal, model AJX-6100PC).
In this work, we have found that HPA-catalyzed furfural acetaliza-
tion with methanol quickly provided dimethyl acetal (ca. 30 min); since
they were stable products at room temperature, there was no need to
remove water during the reaction.
3.2. Ultraviolet spectroscopy and GC–MS analysis
The main reaction products were identified by GC/MS analyses
(Shimadzu MS-QP 2014 ultra mass spectrometer instrument) operating
at 70 eV, coupled with a Shimadzu 2014 GC.
According to Crowel et al., the absorption bands of ultraviolet
spectra of acetals are significantly different from the spectra of the
parent aldehyde and methanol; therefore, these bands can be used to
quantify these species in solution [33]. The UV spectrum of furfural
have two absorption bands; the more intense at wavelength 272 nm and
the second at 222 nm (Fig. 1sp, Supplemental material). Herein, we
follow the reaction progress measuring the decrease of the absorption
band at 272 nm.
2.3. Kinetic measurements
To quantify the furfural during the reaction, standard solutions
(furfural in alcohol- 0.5–22 ppm) were prepared and their characteristic
absorptions were determined by ultraviolet spectroscopy. For the ki-
netic measurements, an aliquot of the reaction was withdrawn and
diluted 250 times and the absorbance was measured in the UV/vis
spectrophotometer.
On the other hand, the acetal group −CH(OCH3)2 is a totally in-
active chromophore in the ultraviolet spectrum region. Acetals of the
furanoid aldehydes have residual chromophore systems comparable to
that of the methyl furan or its derivatives. For instance, the UV spec-
trum of 2-methylfuran has only one absorption band at wavelength
221 nm (Fig. 1sp).
The absorption band of furfural used to its quantification was placed
at wavelength λ = 272 nm. The absorbance of furfural solutions with
different concentrations was used to build the calibration curve, which
allowed quantify the furfural during the reaction.
Fig. 1 shows demonstrate how the furfural acetylation reactions can
be monitored by UV spectroscopy. It is possible to observe the reduction
in the intensity of the furfural absorption band at 272 nm and the in-
crease of the characteristic band of the acetal, placed at 221 nm wa-
velength. After the end of each reaction, an aliquot was analyzed by
GC–MS to identify the compounds in the solution. The acetal was al-
ways the only product formed (ca. 100% acetal selectivity).
The kinetic curves of acetalization reactions of furfural in the pre-
sence of H3PW12O40 or H3PMo12O40 heteropolyacid catalysts are dis-
2.4. Recovery and reuse of the catalyst
After the end of the reaction, excess alcohol was removed under
reduced pressure and 20 mL of water was added. The resulting mixture
was three times extracted with dichloromethane. The aqueous phase
was evaporated under heating plate to near dryness and then dried at
room conditions. The solid catalyst was weighted and reused in another
catalytic run.
The behavior of tungsten and molybdenum HPAs was almost the
same. Within first 20 min of reaction, a virtually complete conversion
was attained by both catalysts, with 100% selectivity of acetal furfural.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. General aspects
3.3. Effect of catalyst on the furfural acetalization with methanol
Furfural acetalization is accomplished through the reaction me-
chanism shown in Scheme 1 [30]. Acetal formation occurs through an
crease the electrophilicity of the carbonyl carbon of furfural for that the
reaction proceed.
The acetalization of furfural with different acidic catalysts was
performed in methanol at room temperature and the results are pre-
sented in Fig. 3. It is important to note that all the acid catalysts were
used at the same H+ cations concentration.
In the absence of the catalyst, even though a large excess of alcohol
to furfural (555:1), no reaction progress was observed (Fig. 3). Con-
versely, the presence of acidic catalysts improved significantly the
conversion of reactions. The catalysts that achieved the highest con-
version percentages were H3PW12O40 and H3PMo12O40 (Fig. 3,
ca. 96%). The catalytic activity obeys the trends H3PW12O40
≥ H3PMo12O40 > H2SO4 > HCl > p-toluenesulfonic acid. This ten-
dency agrees with the pKa values of these acids, which were measured
In according with mechanism proposed in Scheme 1, on the first
reaction step, the oxygen of carbonyl group of the furfural (I) is pro-
tonated, providing an intermediate (II), which undergoes a nucleophilic
attack by the alcohol molecule, giving a protonated tetrahedral inter-
mediate, that after releasing the proton gives the hemiacetal (III). The
intermediate (III) is then protonated and after suffering a dehydration
step generating the carbocation (IV). Finally, the intermediate (IV)
2