J Fluoresc (2011) 21:141–148
143
raphy (TLC). After completion of the reaction, the formed
precipitate was filtered, washed with cold ethanol (3×
H), 10.85 (1H, d, Phen-OH) (Supporting Information,
Figure S4). Elemental analysis. found (calcd.) (%): C, 74.93
(74.98); H, 6.43 (6.47); N, 9.95 (9.99).
1
0 mL) and then dried in vacuum, affording 0.17 g crude
product, which was further purified by silica gel column
chromatography using petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (2/1, v/
v) containing 1% (v/v) triethylamine as eluent. 0.16 g of
The intermediate rhodamine B hydrazide was prepared
referring to the literature [34] with some modifications as
follows. To a vigorously stirred solution of rhodamine B
(1.20 g, 2.6 mmol) in 100 mL anhydrous ethanol at room
temperature, 5.0 mL of hydrazine hydrate (80%) was added
dropwise. After the addition, the mixture was heated to
reflux in an oil bath. When the reaction finished, the
mixture was cooled to room temperature and the solvent
was removed under reduced pressure. Dichloromethane
(30 mL) and water (30 mL) were added to dissolve the
resultant solid. The organic layer was collected, washed
twice with water and dried over anhydrous Na SO .
RhB-pMOSal as white powder solid was obtained, yield:
+
6
1.0%. ESI-MS for C H N O : m/z, calcd. (M + H )
3
6 38 4 4
5
91.29, found 591.42 (100%) (Supporting Information,
1
Figure S1). H NMR (CDCl ): δ (ppm) 1.18 (12H, t,
3
NCH CH ), 3.34 (8H, q, NCH CH ), 3.76 (3H, s,
2
3
2
3
−
OCH ), 6.27 (2H, d, Xanthene-H), 6.38 (2H, s,
3
Xanthene-H), 6.48–6.51 (4H, t, Phen-H), 7.02 (1H, d,
Phen-H), 7.18 (1H, d, Phen-H), 7.54 (2H, t, Ar-H), 7.99
(
1H, d, Ar-H), 9.23 (1H, s, N=C-H), 11.084 (1H, s, Phen-
2
4
OH) (Supporting Information, Figure S2). Elemental
analysis. Found (calcd.) (%): C, 73.23 (73.20); H, 6.43
Filtration of sodium sulfate and evaporation of the solvent
gave crude solid product, which was further purified by
silica gel column chromatography using petroleum ether/
ethyl acetate (1/1, v/v) containing 1% (v/v) triethylamine
as eluent. White solid was obtained in 74.0% yield. ESI-
(
6.48); N, 9.41 (9.48).
RhB-Sal that used as control was synthesized according
to the above method using rhodamine B hydrazide and 2-
hydroxybenzaldehyde as raw materials. After further
purification of the crude product by silica gel chromatog-
raphy using the same eluent, a white powder was obtained
in 71.4% yield. ESI-MS for C H N O : m/z, calcd. (M+
+
MS for C H N O : m/z, calcd. (M+H ) 457.25, found
2
8 32 4 2
+
457.58 (4 %); (2 M+Na ) 935.17, found 935.58 (100%)
(Supporting Information, Figure S5). H NMR (CDCl ): δ
1
3
(ppm) 1.18 (12H, t, NCH CH , J=7.0 Hz), 3.36 (8H, q,
3
5
36
4
3
2
3
+
+
H ) 561.28, found 561.40 (90%); (2 M+Na ) 1143.38,
found 1143.25 (100%) (Supporting Information, Figure
S3). H NMR (CDCl ): δ (ppm) 1.18 (12H, t, NCH CH ,
NCH CH , J=7.0 Hz), 3.63 (2H, bs, NH ), 6.30 (2H, dd,
2 3 2
Xanthene-H, J =9.0 Hz, J =2.4 Hz), 6.44(2H, d,
1
2
1
Xanthene-H, J=2.4 Hz), 6.48 (2H, d, Xanthene-H, J=
9.0 Hz), 7.13 (1H, dd, Ar-H, J =5.4 Hz, J =3.3 Hz), 7.46
3
2
3
J=7.1 Hz), 3.33 (8H, q, NCH CH , J=7.1 Hz), 6.28 (2H,
2
3
1
2
dd, Xanthene-H, J =8.9 Hz, J =2.2 Hz), 6.48 (2H, d,
(1H, d, Ar-H, J=3.3 Hz), 7.47 (1H, d, Ar-H, J=3.3 Hz),
7.96 (1H, dd, Ar-H, J =5.4 Hz, J =3.3 Hz). (Supporting
Information, Figure S6). Elemental analysis. found
(calcd.) (%): C, 73.63 (73.66); H, 7.03 (7.06); N, 12.24
(12.27).
1
2
Xanthene-H, J=2.2 Hz), 6.50 (2H, d, Xanthene-H, J=
.9 Hz), 6.78 (1H, dd, Phen-H), 6.85 (1H, d, Phen-H), 7.10
1H, d, Phen-H), 7.17 (1H, s, Phen-H), 7.19 (1H, d, Ar-H),
1
2
8
(
7
.51 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.98 (1H, d, Ar-H), 9.26 (1H, d, N=C-
Fig. 1 Cu +-induced variations of the absorption (a) and the fluorescence spectra (b) of RhB-pMOSal in 50 mmol L−1 Tris-buffer/acetonitrile (1/
2
1
, v/v, pH 7.0) solution