T.K. Jana et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 583 (2014) 510–515
511
[
19], CdS nanoparticles/ZnO nanowires heterostructure [31] have
been reported addressing several relevant issues. But several key
factors like development of facile preparation method, generation
of proper lattice interface to facilitate the charge transfer, enhance-
ment of the total activation site i.e. surface area are still remain a
challenge for the scientific community.
Here we propose a novel method to tether CdS to ZnO in such a
fashion so that self assembled flower like unique nanostructures of
CdS–ZnO has been synthesized and the sample shows high photo-
catalytic activity employing effective charge transfer between two
coupled semiconductors. Simple chemical route is adopted for the
growth of these novel nanocomposite and structural, chemical and
morphological details of the specimen has been studied. A possible
growth mechanism has been demonstrated for the better under-
standing of the materials. Absorption and emission properties of
the nanocomposite have been investigated and finally the visible
light photocatalytic activity of flower like CdS–ZnO nanostructure
for degradation of RhB is studied in details. RhB is taken as model
organic dye as it is the important xanthene dye and dye pollutants
from the textile industry.
Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of as prepared CdS and CdS–ZnO nanocomposite.
peak intensity of pure CdS, the peak intensity of CdS–ZnO for CdS
phase is noticeably weak. The result is expected [32,33] because
the CdS is being shielded for the incoming X-ray by the ZnO in
the composite form. It is also very distinct from the peak intensity
that ZnO phase is much stronger than the CdS phase in the final
product. CdS phase (ICDD card No. 65-2887) has cubic zinc blend
structure with lattice constant a = 5.8320 Å where as ZnO phase
is matched with ICDD card No. 36-1451 having hexagonal wurtzite
crystal structure (a = b = 3.2495 Å, c = 5.2069 Å).
2
. Experimental section
All the chemicals are Merck made of analytical grade and used without further
purification.
2.1. Preparation of CdS
2 2
For preparation of CdS nanoseed, CdCl and Na S were used as the reactants
with molar ratio 1:1. These precursors were dissolved in distilled water under stir-
ring (20 min). Then Na S solution was added drop wise in CdCl solution keeping
2
2
The photo gallery of Fig. 2 shows the typical SEM and TEM
images of the synthesized CdS–ZnO nanocomposite structure.
Fig. 2(a)–(c) shows the SEM images at different magnifications
and Fig. 2(d)–(f) shows the TEM images at increasing magnifica-
tion. It is evident from Fig. 2(a) that the synthesized materials
has a unique flower like structure where the central part looks
much brighter and several petal like protrusion come out at differ-
ent directions from the center. Fig. 2(b) shows such few CdS–ZnO
nanoflowers where it seems the flower has grown partially. In
Fig. 2(c) one fully grown flower like structure has been shown.
Here the number of petals is higher than the number of petals in
the flower like structure shown in Fig. 2(b) and the figure repre-
sents the typical structure of a complete CdS–ZnO unit, evolves
in this synthesis mechanism. The TEM image shown in Fig. 2(d)
also supports the morphology of a flower like structure of the
grown composite materials. Here also the central part is much dar-
ker and it signifies that the central part is the densest region in
these three dimensionally grown structures. Fig. 2(e) shows the
magnified version of a petal in the flower structure where it is seen
that the petal is formed due to the congregation of several rod like
structures. In Fig. 2(f) high resolution TEM shows clearly the aggre-
gation of rods in a part of a petal. The atomic planes visible in the
rod shows the unidirectional growth of ZnO and it is evident that
the rods are actually made of ZnO to form the petal part of this un-
ique structure. The average total size of a typical CdS–ZnO flower is
around 400 nm and the average size of the petal is 100–150 nm.
But the rod inside the petal has an average size of 10 nm. The aver-
age size of the central core is 90 nm.
the solution under constant stirring. The whole system was maintained in ice-bath.
The precipitate was centrifuged and washed with distilled water for several times
until the pH becomes normal. The final water solution from where the precipitate
was taken was also tested with silver nitrate solution to discard the presence of
NaCl in the product. Finally, the obtained powder was dried at 100 °C for 2 h in a
vacuum furnace to get CdS nanoparticles which will be used as nanoseed for the
next synthesis part.
2.2. Preparation of CdS–ZnO nanocomposite
To produce CdS–ZnO nano composite, 0.03 gm CdS nanoparticles were well dis-
persed (sonicated for 30 min) in 25 ml distilled water (solution A). Separately zinc
nitrate solution (B) taking 1.48 gm Zn(NO in 15 ml DI water and NaOH solution
C) taking 0.4 gm NaOH in 10 ml DI water were also prepared.
Then solution B and solution C was added drop wise in solution A under stirring
3 2
)
(
condition for 30 min for the formation of ZnO crystal on the nucleating sites of CdS
nanoseeds. After the reaction is over the resultant precipitate was centrifuged and
washed with distilled water for several times until the pH becomes 7 and then dried
in a vacuum furnace at 100 °C for 2 h to produce CdS–ZnO nanocomposite.
Structural analysis of all the powdered samples were carried out by Rigaku
Mini–Flex X-ray diffractometer using Cu Ka radiation (k = 1.54178 Å) source. Mor-
phological analysis was done by both JEM 2100 Transmission Electron Microscope
at an accelerating voltage of 200 keV and FEI, Inspect F Scanning Electron Micros-
copy. EDX was carried out in S-4200, Hitachi. Optical absorption spectra of the pow-
dered samples were recorded in a UV–Vis 1700 Shimadzu Spectrophotometer and
to get these spectra the powdered samples were dispersed in ethyl alcohol and
mounted in the sample chamber while pure ethyl alcohol was taken in the refer-
ence beam position. In case of photocatalysis study the organic dye RhB was taken
in distilled water and the sample was dispersed in that solution. For the PL the sam-
ple was taken in powder form and the measurement was carried out in Perkin El-
mer LS55 fluorescence spectrophotometer.
3
. Result and discussion
As the lattice fringe pattern is not visible in the relatively thick
center part of the structure the SAED pattern was taken from that
region and the result, shown in Fig. 3(a), matches with the crystal
planes of CdS. So, it can be said that the central part of the structure
is formed from the seed materials i.e. CdS and the petal parts are
made of ZnO which was grown on the latter half of the synthesis
procedure. To corroborate the chemical analysis, EDX of the sample
was also carried out and the result shows the existence of Cd, S, Zn
and O elements. Here the strong Si line was originated from the Si
3.1. Structural, chemical and morphological study
Fig. 1 shows the XRD analyzed data for as prepared CdS and
CdS–ZnO samples both. It is evident from the peaks of the CdS–
ZnO sample that the product is well crystalline having no impurity
as there is no unmatched peak. All the peaks of the final product
are matched either with CdS or ZnO. Interestingly compare to the