O. Monroy, L. Fomina, M.-E. Sánchez-Vergara et al.
Journal of Molecular Structure 1245 (2021) 131012
(s, 1H, N–H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 61.23, 70.43, 110.48
(C-pyrrole), 115.06, 115.54, 120.24, 122.41, 123.86, 126.34, 128.69,
129.19, 129.78, 133.92, 135.47, 141.72, 150.28, 156.46, 178.92.
(
9 h) 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ): δ 1.62 (s, 6H, -CH ), 4.69
3 3
6
(
(
s, 4H, –OCH ), 6.35 (s, 2H, H-pyrrole), 6.98 (m, 11H). 13C NMR
2
75 MHz, CDCl ): δ 30.92, 41.72, 70.90, 110.89 (C-pyrrole), 114.15,
3
1
19.29, 127.73, 131.54, 144.00, 155.23.
(
9i) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ): δ 1.61 (s, 6H, -CH ), 4.75 (s,
3.5. Characterization of wafer-shaped polymers
3
3
2
H, –OCH ), 6.53 (s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 6.91 (m, 8H), 8.03 (s, 2H), 8.90
2
(
(
s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ): δ 30.39, 41.33, 69.99, 110.18
C-pyrrole), 114.16, 127.67, 144.13, 155.40.
We used a Unicam spectrophotometer, model UV300, in the
wavelength range of 200–1100 nm, to measure the optical proper-
ties of the UV–vis spectroscopy of the polymers. The optical band
gap values of polymers were calculated from the absorption coef-
ficient and photon energy. The X-ray diffraction analysis was un-
dertaken using the θ−2θ technique, applying Bragg-Brentano Ge-
ometry with a Bruker, D8 Avance diffractometer and working with
CuK-α (λ=0.15405 nm) radiation.
3
(
9j) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ): δ 1.64 (s, 6H, -CH ), 4.73 (s, 2H,
3
3
–
OCH ), 6.68 (s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 6.98 (m, 11H). 13C NMR (100 MHz,
2
CDCl ): δ 31.00, 41.81, 70.99, 107.95 (C-pyrrole), 114.23, 127.84,
29.84, 144.11, 148.23, 155.32.
3
1
A mixture of 8 (0.1 g, 0.25 mmol), copper (I) chloride (0.005 g,
0
.05 mmol) and the corresponding amine (0.5 mmol), in DMF
(
10 mL) was maintained at 110 °C for 48 h, while stirring in an
atmosphere of nitrogen; then the solution was diluted with excess
acidified water. The precipitate was filtered off and then dried at
room temperature.
4. Conclusions
In this work, we synthesized 20 novel polymers containing pyr-
role fragments with electron-withdrawing groups, as new poten-
tial organic materials with semiconductor behavior, following the
Reisch-Schulte procedure. These new diphenyl-pyrrole based poly-
mers were fully characterized by NMR, IR and thermal analysis.
The molecular weights of the polymers were also determined. The
chemical reactions on the part of the diacetylene group can be em-
ployed to modify polydiacetylenes, resulting in very different poly-
mers. Likewise, the reactions of diacetylene groups with aromatic
amines to produce N-diaryl-pyrrole fragments in the presence of
copper (I) chloride as a catalyst proceed under mild conditions,
helping curtail unwanted side-effects.
(
10a) 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 4.90 (s, 4H, –OCH ),
6
2
.34 (s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 7.04 (m, 16H), 10.65 (s, 1H, N–H). 13C NMR
6
(
75 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 60.68, 69.91, 109.86 (C-pyrrole), 114.46,
15.04, 121.79, 124.92, 125.80, 128.01, 132.11, 133.79, 135.29, 141.19,
6
1
1
56.33, 178.69.
10b) 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 4.91 (s, 4H, –OCH ),
(
6
2
.39 (s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 6.95 (m, 15H), 10.66 (s, 1H, N–H). 13C NMR
6
(
75 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 60.71, 69.91, 109.86 (C-pyrrole), 114.55,
6
1
15.03, 121.79, 125.81, 128.19, 129.13, 132.15, 133.41, 134.96, 141.20,
1
55.95, 178.41.
10c) 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 4.91 (s, 4H, –OCH ) 6.37
6 2
(
s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 6.96 (m, 15H), 10.65 (m, 1H, N–H). 13C NMR
(
(
The optical band gap of polymers was obtained using Tauc’s
method, revealing values in a range of 2.0–2.9 eV for the polymers
9a-9j and of 1.35–2.8 eV for the polymers 10a-10j.
75 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 60.71, 69.92, 109.90 (C-pyrrole), 114.48,
15.06, 121.84, 125.85, 128.06, 129.16, 132.15, 133.81, 135.31, 141.22,
6
1
1
56.36, 178.72.
10d) 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 4.92 (s, 4H, –OCH ),
All polymers present semiconductor behavior. Importantly, their
band gap can be modulated by modifying the position and type of
the substituent. These polymers exhibit moderate decomposition
temperatures and can be used in optoelectronic devices in wafer
form, without the need to manufacture thin films.
(
6
2
.40 (s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 7.04 (m, 16H), 10.63 (s, 1H, N–H). 13C NMR
6
(
75 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 60.66, 69.88, 109.81 (C-pyrrole), 114.51,
6
115.00, 121.76, 125.80, 126.20, 128.98, 132.09, 133.76, 135.26,
1
41.17, 156.29, 178.65.
(
10e) 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 4.91 (s, 4H, –OCH ),
Declaration of Competing Interest
6
2
.67 (s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 7.04 (m, 15H), 10.72 (s, 1H, N–H). 13C NMR
6
(
75 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 61.16, 70.36, 110.44 (C-pyrrole), 114.98,
The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to
influence the work reported in this paper.
6
1
15.49, 120.97, 122.38, 123.91, 123.97, 126.29, 129.59, 131.54,
33.85, 135.41, 141.66, 148.58, 156.38, 178.86.
10f) 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 4.91 (s, 4H, –OCH ), 6.67
1
(
6
2
(
(
(
s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 7.03 (m, 12H), 7.82 (m, 1H), 8.16 (m, 2H), 10.72
CRediT authorship contribution statement
s, 1H, N–H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 60.75, 76.04, 110.02
6
C-pyrrole), 114.57, 115.07, 116.47, 121.96, 123.80, 125.89, 128.24,
Olivia Monroy: Investigation, Methodology, Validation.
Lioudmila Fomina: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Visual-
ization, Funding acquisition. María-Elena Sánchez-Vergara: Con-
ceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis. Giovanna Angélica
Vázquez-Hernández: Methodology, Validation, Visualization.
Larissa Alexandrova: Investigation, Supervision, Funding acquisi-
tion. Ruben Gaviño: Formal analysis, Data curation. Lev Rumsh:
Conceptualization, Methodology, Visualization. Mikhail G. Zolo-
tukhin: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis.
Roberto Salcedo: Conceptualization, Software, Writing – review &
editing.
1
28.80, 129.18, 133.44, 135.00, 141.24, 151.78, 155.96, 178.46.
10 g) 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 10.69 (s, 1H, N–H), 8.00
(
6
(
d, 2H), 7.02 (m, 13H), 6.67 (s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 4.91 (s, 4H, –OCH ).
2
13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO): δ 60.70, 69.92, 109.97 (C-pyrrole),
114.43, 114.54, 121.89, 125.83, 128.17, 129.12, 129.61, 133.40, 134.95,
141.20, 155.94, 178.40.
(
10 h) 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 4.91 (s, 4H, –OCH ),
6
2
.55 (s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 6.98 (m, 15H), 10.62 (s, 1H, N–H). 13C
6
NMR (75 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 61.18, 70.41, 110.35 (C-pyrrole), 111.78,
6
1
14.90, 114.96, 115.52, 122.28, 126.30, 128.50, 129.51, 129.62,
32.61, 134.29, 135.79, 141.70, 151.06, 156.83, 179.18.
10i) 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 4.90 (s, 4H, –OCH ), 6.52
1
(
Acknowledgments
6
2
(
s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 7.01 (m, 12H), 7.74 (d, 2H), 7.89 (t, 1H), 10.69 (s,
H, N–H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 61.22, 70.43, 104.21,
1
The authors are grateful to G. Cedillo Valverde and M. Á.
Canseco Martinez for their assistance with Nuclear Magnetic Res-
onance and IR analyses, respectively, to S. López Morales for GPC
measurements and to K. E. Reyes Morales for thermal analyses. The
authors wish to express their gratitude to M. T. Vázquez Mejia, O.L.
Jiménez Alvarez for technical help and to A. López Vivas and A.
6
1
10.48 (C-pyrrole), 112.88, 115.06, 122.41, 126.34, 128.69, 129.30,
29.53, 132.63, 133.93, 135.47, 141.72, 151.63, 156.46, 178.92.
10j) 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO–d ): δ 4.90 (s, 4H, –OCH ), 6.67
1
(
6
2
(
s, 1H, H-pyrrole), 7.04 (m, 12H), 8.16 (m, 2H), 8.79 (d, 1H), 10.70
9