582
M. Moghadam et al.
H2O was added, and then extracted with CHCl3. The organic
layer was dried (Na2SO4). Evaporation of the solvent gave an
almost pure product. Further purification was achieved by
recrystallization of the product (2a was recrystallized from
cyclohexane, 2b–2i were recrystallized from n-hexane, and
2j and 2k were recrystallized from methanol) and gave the
pure 2-imidzolines and bisimidazolines 2 in 84–98% yields
(Table 1). The identities of products were confirmed by mp,
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that assem-
blies of different 2-imidazolines and bisimidazolines
can be rapidly prepared by microwave-assisted pro-
tocols. The isolated yields in the both parallel and
sequential synthesis were comparable (81–98%) and
provided the desired compounds in high purity after a
simple workup. We have demonstrated that the syn-
theses reported herein could equally be successfully
executed under a monomode environment with care-
ful optimizations. Also, feasibility of a direct scale-up
has been confirmed. In comparison with the reported
procedure for the synthesis of 2-imidazolines cata-
lyzed by P2S5, the workup of this method is easier
and extraction of the reaction mixture gives almost
pure products. The application of ultrasonic irradia-
tion also led to the synthesis of 2-imidazolines and
bisimidazolines in high yield in short reaction times.
1
IR, and H NMR spectroscopic data.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of 2-Imidazolines
and Bisimidazolines Under Ultrasonic Irradiation
A mixture of 10mmol nitrile 1, 40 mmol EDA, and 0.35 mmol
P2S5 was irradiated with ultrasonic waves for appropriate time
(Table 1). After completion of the reaction as indicated by
TLC (eluent: EtOAc=MeOH ¼ 4=1), cold H2O was added
and the product was extracted with 2ꢁ10 cm3 CHCl3.
Evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure and purifi-
cation by a silica gel column (eluent: EtOAc=MeOH¼ 4=1)
gave the imidazoline 2. Recrystallization of product (2a was
recrystallized from cyclohexane, 2b–2i were recrystallized
from n-hexane, and 2j and 2k were recrystallized from metha-
nol) gave the pure product in good to excellent yields based on
the starting nitrile (Table 1). The identities of products were
Experimental
All chemicals were commercial products. EDA was distilled
over KOH before use. All melting points were obtained using
a Stuart Scientific apparatus. TLC monitoring for all reactions,
and all yields refer to isolated products. For reaction monitor-
ing and quality (purity) control of the product a Waters 996
HPLC system, that included Waters 600-MS pumps, an auto-
sampler (Waters 712 WISP), and Waters 996 photodiode array
UV detector was used. The separations were carried out using
a Chromolith Performance reversed phase analytical column
(E. Merck, 100ꢁ4.6 mm) at 25ꢂC and a mobile phase from
(A) 0.1% TFA in 97=3 H2O=MeCN and (B) 0.1% TFA in
MeCN (all solvents were HPLC grade, Fisher and Merck;
TFA was analytical reagent grade, Roth). The following gra-
dients were applied at a flow rate of 3 cm3=min: linear in-
crease from 3 to 60% solution B in 8 min, hold at 60%
solution B for 2 min. 1H NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3
on a Brucker AC 80 spectrometer. Infrared spectra were re-
corded on a Shimadzu IR-435 spectrophotometer in KBr with
1
confirmed by mp, IR, and H NMR spectral data.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Graduate Studies and Center of Excel-
lence of Chemistry of Isfahan University (CECIU) for finan-
cial support of this work. B.H.Y. acknowledges Prof. U. Jordis
scientific supervision and help during his postdoctoral re-
search at IAS 2004–2005.
References
[1] Li HY, Drummond S, De Lucca I, Boswell GA (1996)
Tetrahedron 52: 11153
[2] Ueno M, Imaizumi K, Sugita T, Takata I, Takeshita M
(1995) Int J Immunopharmacol 17: 597
[3] Wang X, Rondu F, Lamouri A, Dokhan R, Marc S,
Touboul E, Pfeiffer B, Manechez D, Renard P,
Guardiola-Lemaitre B, Godfroid JJ, Ktorza A, Penicaud
L (1996) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 278: 82
[4] Rondu F, Le Bihan G, Wang X, Lamouri A, Touboul E,
Dive G, Bellahsene T, Pfeiffer B, Renard P, Guardiola-
Lemaitre B, Manechez D, Penicaud L, Ktorza A,
Godfroid JJ (1997) J Med Chem 40: 3793
[5] Le Bihan G, Rondu F, Pele-Tounian A, Wang X, Lidy S,
Touboul E, Lamouri A, Dive G, Huet J, Pfeiffer B,
Renard P, Guardiola-Lemaitre B, Manechez D, Penicaud
L, Ktorza A, Godfroid JJ (1999) J Med Chem 42: 1587
[6] Chan S (1993) Clin Sci 85: 671
[7] a) Tsujii S, Rinehart KL, Gunasekera SP, Kashman Y,
Cross SS, Lui MS, Pomponi SA, Diaz MC (1998) J Org
Chem 53: 5446; b) Ohtani I, Moore RE, Runnegar MTC
(1992) J Am Chem Soc 114: 7941
absorption in cmꢃ1
.
The reactions, under MW irradiation, were performed using
the sealed vessel capabilities of a dedicated single-mode mi-
crowave reactor, CEM ExplorerTM (a single mode automated
microwave instrument). The reactions, under ultrasonic irra-
diation, were carried out at room temperature in a 40 cm3 glass
reactor. A UP 400S ultrasonic processor equipped with a 3 mm
wide and 140 mm long probe, which was immersed directly
into the reaction mixture, was used for sonication.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of 2-Imidazolines
and Bisimidazolines Under MW Irradiation
A mixture of 4 mmol nitrile 1, 16mmol EDA, and 0.14 mmol
P2S5 was irradiated with microwave (720W) for 1.25–20min
by pulsed irradiation (30 s with 20s interval). The progress of
the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the
reaction the mixture was cooled to room temperature, cold