Steric hindrance as a key factor on proton transfer
1195
ꢃ
Table 5 Derived values for the reaction of 1 in DMSO
made at 25 C. First-order rate constants, precise to ꢀ3%,
were evaluated using standard methods.
a
þ
Aniline
K (AnH )=
ꢁ
KDABCO
K1=
dm mol
a
mol dm
3
3
ꢁ1
Acknowledgements
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
4
4
5
3
6
6
ꢁ8
ꢁ7
ꢁ7
ꢁ8
ꢁ9
ꢁ9
2
2
2
2
2
2
a 2,6-Et
b 2,6-Me
c 2,4-Me
d 2-F
e 2-Cl
f 2-CN
7.58ꢂ10
6.76ꢂ10
4.36ꢂ10
8.91ꢂ10
0.04
1.8ꢂ10
1.3ꢂ10
8.0ꢂ10
2.0ꢂ10
3.5ꢂ10
1.8ꢂ10
6.0ꢂ10
4.0ꢂ10
I would like to thank Dr. M.R. Crampton, Durham University,
UK for his voluble advice.
5
7
7
7
3.87ꢂ10
1.25ꢂ10
3.83ꢂ10
3.70ꢂ10
0.39
References
a
1. For reviews see: (a) Terrier F (1991) Nucleophilic
Aromatic Displacement, VCH, New York; (b) Terrier F
Values from Table 2
(
1982) Chem Rev 82:77
around a factor of ten larger than that for 2c and this
may indicate the higher acidities of 3a and 3b than
of 3c. Steric inhibition of solvation caused by the
two o-subsitituents is the likely cause.
The results in Table 5 show that increasing elec-
tron withdrawal in the ring-subsitituents, R, in the
aniline nucleophiles results in decreased values of
2
3
. Crampton MR, Gold V (1967) J Chem Soc B:23
. Bernasconi CF, Muller MC, Schmid P (1979 ) J Org
Chem 44:3189
4. Crampton MR Gibson BJ (1981) J Chem Soc Perkin
Trans 2:533
. Crampton MR, Greenhalgh C (1983) J Chem Soc Perkin
Trans 2:1175
. Crampton MR, Robotham IA (1997) J Chem Res S 22
5
6
K . This is reasonably attributed to an electronic
1
7. Buncel E, Webb JGK (1972) Can J Chem 50:129
8. Buncel E, Jarrell H, Leung HW, Webb JGK (1974) J Org
Chem 39:272
effect. The steric effects on K as previously men-
1
tioned, appear to be relatively small. However, the
significantly lower value for 2,6-diethylaniline (2a)
than for 2,6-dimethylaniline (2b) may be evidence
for some unfavorable steric interactions in the zwit-
terion 3a.
In the present work involving o-substituted ani-
lines there was no evidence that the anilines can
compete with DABCO in the proton-transfer process.
Even though the equilibrium 3 Ð 4 should be in fa-
vor of 4 with anilines as the proton-accepting bases,
it is likely that the increased steric-hindrance when
9
. Buncel E, Webb JGK (1974) Can J Chem 52:630
1
1
0. Buncel E, Leung HW (1975) J Chem Soc Chem
Commun:19
1. Buncel E, Eggimann W (1977) J Am Chem Soc 99:5958
12. Buncel E, Eggimann W, Leung HW (1977) J Chem Soc
Chem Commun:55
1
1
1
3. Buncel E, Eggimann W (1978) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans
:673
2
4. Bamkole TO, Hirst J, Onyido I (1981) J Chem Soc Perkin
Trans 2:1201
5. Crampton MR, Robotham IA (1998) Can J Chem 76:627
16. Asghar BHM, Crampton MR (2005) Org Biomol Chem
:3971
7. Bordwell FG, Branca JC, Hughes DL, Olmstead WN
1980) J Org Chem 45:3305
3
2-substituted anilines act both as nucleophile and
base kinetically disfavors this process.
1
1
1
(
8. Perrin DD (1972) Dissociation constants of organic bases
in aqueous solution. Butterworths, London
9. Crampton MR (1971) J Chem Soc B:2112
Experimental
1
,3,5-Trinitrobenzene and 2,4-dinitrophenol, anilines, DABCO,
20. Crampton MR, Lord SD (1997) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans
2:369
21. Crampton MR, Routledge PJ, Golding P (1984) J Chem
Soc Perkin Trans 2:329
22. Crampton MR, Routledge PJ (1984) J Chem Soc Perkin
Trans 2:573
23. Crampton MR, Emokpae TA, Isanbor C (2007) Eur J Org
Chem 8:1378
and DMSO were the purest available commercial samples
from Aldrich. Amine salts were prepared in solution by the
accurate neutralisation of amines with concentrated hydro-
chloric acid. UV-Vis spectra and kinetic measurements were
made with an Applied Photophysics SX-17MV stopped-flow
instrument, or with Shimadzu UV-2101 PC or Sp6-550 UV=
vis Pye unicam spectrophotometers. All measurements were