Communication
Dalton Transactions
isation of the N–H bonds in 6 is similar to that in 5 (and 4).
Although we also observe strong interaction between 6 and
nitrate, 1H NMR titration of 6 with TBANO3 in CDCl3 indicated
that more than one binding process occurs (e.g., N–H chela-
tion and potentially side-on N/Me). This prevented quantitative
analysis of the process.
In conclusion, we have shown that metal coordination to
seleno-cyclodiphosph(V)azanes (producing cationic receptor
units) increases their affinity for anions, largely by the receptor
units possessing net positive charge which leads to greater
electrostatic interaction. Metal coordination can also switch on
anion binding, as in the case of 5 with BF4−; a process that can
be reversed by removal of the metal. Non-metal based, posi-
tively charged phosphazane receptors which also have high
binding constants can also be used, in which one of the PvSe
groups is replaced with a P–Me+ functionality.
Scheme 2 Synthesis and binding behaviour of 6.
reversed, with the 19F NMR spectrum after chloride addition
−
showing free BF4 alone (having the same chemical shift as
that in the TBABF4 reference solution). This provides the
potential for a capture-release strategy using phosph(V)azane
receptors of this type.19,20
Given that a major contribution to the increase in the
anion affinity is the net positive charge of the metal-bonded
receptor units in 4 and 5, we wondered whether a similar
increase in anion binding could be promoted by alkylation of
the P-centres, producing
phosphonium receptor. In order to investigate this we syn-
thesized [tBuNH(Sev)P(µ-NtBu)2P(Me)HNtBu]BArF (6) (BArF
Conflicts of interest
a (metal-free) positively-charged
There are no conflicts to declare.
=
[(3,5-CF3)2C6H3]4B−) from a modified synthetic protocol to that
reported previously by Balakrishna for the synthesis of the
iodide salt of 6 (Scheme 2).21,22 We chose BArF in our case in
order to minimize coordination of the counter-anion to the
[tBuNH(Sev)P(µ-NtBu)2P(Me)HNtBu]+ cation and to improve
solubility in organic solvents. 6 is stable under benchtop
conditions for at least 6 months and does not require the use
of pre-dried solvents. Importantly, the room-temperature
1H NMR spectrum of 6 in CDCl3 shows that both of the N–H
protons have similar chemical shifts [δ(SevPNH) = 3.43 ppm,
δ(Me-PNH) = 3.30 ppm], suggesting that methylation of only
one of the phosphorus(III) centres results in similar polaris-
ation of the two N–H protons. In addition, the chemical shifts
of the N–H protons in 6 are similar to those in 3 (δ = 3.20)
implying similar polarisation. Addition of increasing amounts
of TBABF4 in CDCl3 solution results in gradual downfield shift-
Acknowledgements
We thank the Cambridge Trust (Vice Chancellor Scholarship
for AJP).
Notes and references
1 P. A. Gale, E. N. W. Howe, X. Wu and M. J. Spooner, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 2018, 375, 333–372.
2 P. A. Gale, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 216–226.
3 V. Amendola, G. Bergamaschi, M. Boiocchi, L. Fabbrizzi
and M. Milani, Chem. – Eur. J., 2010, 16, 4368–4380.
4 N. Busschaert, I. L. Kirby, S. Young, S. J. Coles,
P. N. Horton, M. E. Light and P. A. Gale, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2012, 51, 4426–4430.
1
ing of both N–H resonances in the room-temperature H NMR
−
spectrum, supporting the binding of the BF4 anion to the
N–H protons (as in 4 and 5). This process was most accurately
5 A. J. Plajer, R. García-Rodríguez, C. G. M. Benson,
P. D. Matthews, A. D. Bond, S. Singh, L. H. Gade and
D. S. Wright, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 9087–9090.
6 A. J. Plajer, F. J. Rizzuto, H.-C. Niu, S. Lee, J. M. Goodman
and D. S. Wright, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 10655–
10659.
modelled using a non-cooperative 2 : 1 receptor : anion binding
model with KA = (6112.9
525.7) M−1. Employing a 1 : 1
binding model produced an associated error of 158.1% (vs.
2 : 1 model 8.6%). The 19F NMR spectrum of a 1 : 1 mixture of
−
6 and TBABF4 in CDCl3 also indicates that the BF4 anion is
bound in solution with Δδ = 1.60 ppm (compared to free
BF4−). Unfortunately, we; were unable to obtain the pure BArF
analogues of 4 and 5, so that quantitative comparison of the
binding data with that for 6 is not possible.
7 A. J. Plajer, H.-C. Niu, F. J. Rizzuto and D. S. Wright, Dalton
Trans., 2018, 47, 6675–6678.
8 H.-C. Niu, A. J. Plajer, R. Garcia-Rodriguez, S. Singh and
D. S. Wright, Chem. – Eur. J., 2018, 24, 3073–3082.
9 M. S. Balakrishna, Dalton Trans., 2016, 45, 12252–12282.
10 G. G. Briand, T. Chivers and M. Krahn, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2002, 233–234, 237–254.
11 A. Nordheider, T. Chivers, R. Thirumoorthi, I. Vargas-Baca
and J. Derek Woollins, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 6346–
6348.
As mentioned above, dicylcophospha(V)azane 3 does not
−
bind BF4 in CDCl3. The spectroscopic data suggests that the
high affinity of 6 for BF4− is largely driven by coulombic attrac-
−
tion between the cationic receptor and the BF4 anion. This is
supported, albeit circumstantially, by DFT calculations at the
B3LYP-D3/def2-sv(p) level of theory which show that the polar-
Dalton Trans.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020