K. Kumar, Virendra Kumar Chaudhary, U.P. Singh et al.
Polyhedron 199 (2021) 115048
6.2. Syntheses of the metal complexes
nitrophenolate at 424 nm [43]. After three days the final A values
1
for each set were obtained.
6.2.1. Synthesis of [Zn2(Phimp)2(Cl)2] (1)
To a solution of PhimpH (0.145 g, 0.5 mmol) in acetonitrile
(10 mL), sodium hydride (0.012 g, 0.5 mmol) was added consecu-
tively in acetonitrile, and the resulting solution was stirred for
40 min. A solution of anhydrous ZnCl2 (0.085 g, 0.5 mmol) in ace-
tonitrile was then added to the reaction mixture with constant stir-
ring. After 8 h stirring, a yellow-colored complex precipitated out.
The solvent was evaporated and the solid was separated by filtra-
tion. A yellow-colored compound resulted after redissolving the
solid in methanol, then layering this solution with hexane. This
compound was washed with diethyl ether and dried under air.
Yield: 76%. Anal. Calcd for C36H28N6Cl2O2Zn2: C, 55.55; H, 3.63;
N, 10.80. Found: C, 55.38; H, 3.72; N, 10.64. IR (KBr pellets,
6.4. General procedure for benzoxazole synthesis
The Schiff base substrate (1 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL ace-
tonitrile. To this solution, 0.1 mol % of catalyst was added, then
3 mol% of TEMPO was added at room temperature. The reaction
mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 12 h. The solvent was then evapo-
rated, followed by addition of ethyl acetate. The reaction mixture
was filtered and the filtrate was purified by column chromatogra-
phy using silica gel (mesh size 60–120) and hexane as the eluent.
The product yield was calculated based on the yield obtained after
column chromatography. The NMR spectra of the compounds 3a–
3e, formed after catalysis, are shown in Figs. S12–S21.
cmꢀ1):
m(C@N), 1637, 1571, 1483, 1440, 1346, 1306, 1218, 1146,
1056, 958, 879, 811, 772, 697, 564. UV–vis (CH3CN kmax, nm (e,
in Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1)): 335 (50939), 307 (35606), 235 (28290).
6.5. NMR of the benzoxazole derivatives
6.2.2. Synthesis of [Zn2(Me-Phimp)2(Cl)2] (2)
2-Phenylbenzoxazole (3a): White solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) d, ppm: 8.27 (m, 2H), 7.79–7.77 (m, 1H), 7.60–7.58 (m,
1H), 7.54–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.36 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3)
d, ppm: 163.0, 150.7, 142.1, 131.5, 128.9, 127.6, 127.2, 125.1,
124.5, 120.0, 110.6.
This compound was prepared by following the same procedure
as described above for 1, except using Me-PhimpH instead of
PhimpH. The NMR spectra of complex 2 are shown in the support-
ing file (Fig. S25-S26). Yield: 72%. Anal. Calcd for C38H32N6Cl2O2-
Zn2: C, 56.60; H, 4.00; N, 10.42. Found: C, 56.47; H, 4.23; N,
6-Methyl-2-phenylbenzoxazole (3b): White solid. 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) d, ppm: 8.39 (q, J = 8.9 Hz, 4H), 7.60 (s, 1H),
7.50 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 2.51 (s, 3H). 13C
NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) d, ppm: 157.1, 152.2, 142.3, 135.7, 133.3,
129.6, 128.8, 128.6, 120.0, 115.8, 114.9, 21.6.
10.32. IR (KBr pellets, cmꢀ1):
m
(C@N), 1633, 1562, 1480, 1423,
1331, 1315, 1290, 1021, 851, 752, 700, 554. UV–vis (CH3CN kmax,
nm (
, in Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1)): 373 (29444), 332 (36666), 301 (38888),
e
246 (48666).
6-Methoxy-2-phenylbenzoxazole (3c): White solid. 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) d, ppm: 7.97 (m, 3H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H),
7.46 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 3H), 4.34 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) d,
ppm: 153.35, 146.79, 139.66, 134.82, 132.65, 131.02, 130.80,
130.22, 122.45, 115.83, 109.30, 20.00.
6.2.3. Synthesis of [Zn2(OMe-Phimp)2(Cl)2] (3)
This compound was prepared by following the same procedure
as described above for 1, except using OMe-PhimpH instead of
PhimpH. Yield: 71%. Anal. Calcd for C38H32N6Cl2O4Zn2: C, 54.44;
H, 3.85; N, 10.02. Found: C, 54.10; H, 3.63; N, 10.35. IR (KBr pellets,
6-Chloro-2-phenylbenzoxazole (3d): White solid. 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) d, ppm: 7.95–7.98(m, 3H), 7.58(t, J = 7.6 Hz,
2H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) d, ppm:
162.02,150.72, 141.08, 137.73, 129.22, 128.81, 125.30, 124.61,
120.05, 110.57.
cmꢀ1):
(CH3CN kmax, nm (
m
(C@N), 1628, 1564, 1483, 1414, 1356, 1022, 652. UV–vis
e
, in Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1)): 391 (16451), 333 (22548),
303 (22225), 246 (28290).
6.3. Phosphatase activity
6-Nitro-2-phenylbenzoxazole (3e): White solid. 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) d, ppm: 8.44 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 8.39 (d,
J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H),
7.46–7.40 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) d, ppm: 160.6,
151.0, 141.9, 132.8, 128.4, 126.3, 125.2, 124.2, 120.7, 115.0, 110.9.
The dinuclear metal complexes show efficient phosphatase
activity. Para-nitrophenylphosphate (PNPP) was utilized as the
model substrate to explore the phosphatase activity. All experi-
ments were carried out in 97.5% DMF/H2O medium [43,44]. Solu-
tions of the substrate 4-NPP and the zinc complexes were freshly
prepared, and the total volume maintained was 3 mL. An initial
screening of the hydrolytic tendency of all the metal complexes
was performed until 2% formation of 4-nitrophenolate was reached
and then the kinetic data were collected. The rate of hydrolysis of
PNPP in the presence of zinc complexes 1–3 was measured spec-
trophotometrically by monitoring the UV absorption of the p-
nitrophenolate anion at 423 nm as a function of time at 25 °C
[44]. The investigation contained five sets, having a complex con-
centration of 0.05 mmol and substrate concentrations of 0.5 (10
equiv.), 0.7 (14 equiv.), 1.0 (20 equiv), 1.2 (24 equiv.) and 1.5 (30
equiv.) mmol. The stock solutions of 2 mM of the complexes and
the substrate were set up in a DMF/H2O mixture. The reactions
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Kapil Kumar: Conceptualization, Methodology. Virendra
Kumar Chaudhary: . U.P. Singh: . Kaushik Ghosh: Supervision,
Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared
to influence the work reported in this paper.
were performed by injecting 50 lL of the complex and various vol-
umes of the substrate (0.5, 0.74, 1.1, 1.34 and 1.7 mL) in a cuvette
and making the final volume up to 3 mL with solvent. After com-
plete mixing, the spectra were recorded at 25 °C, over 2 h at regular
time intervals of 3 min, for all complexes. All the experiments were
carried out at least twice, and average values were taken. The reac-
tions were corrected for the extent of ionization of 4-nitropheno-
late at 25 °C, utilizing the molar extinction coefficient for 4-
Acknowledgements
K.G. is thankful to CSIR, New Delhi, India for financial assistance
(01(2942)/18/EMR-II dated 01-05-2018). K.K. is thankful to UGC
and V.K.C. is thankful to CSIR, India, for financial assistance. We
are thankful for the Central Instrumental Facility, IIT Roorkee.
7