C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
a
Table 1. Line Positions (cm-1) of the Antisymmetric Stretching
Table 2. Spectroscopic Constants of ZnH2 and ZnD2 (cm-1
)
Fundamental Band, 001 (Σ+) f 000 (Σ+), of ZnH2 and ZnD2
a
u
g
constant
64ZnH2
66ZnH2
64ZnD2
b
J
′
J
′′ b
64ZnH2
66ZnH2
64ZnD2
B000
3.548227(6)
4.914(3)
3.506608(7)
4.917(3)
3.548233(11)
4.915(5)
3.506676(11)
4.919(6)
1.783449(21)
1.235(10)
1.768021(23)
1.232(13)
105 × D000
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1791.1174(2)
1790.2893(0)
1798.2912(0)
1806.2243(2)
1814.0870(2)
1821.8782(1)
1829.5968(-1)
1837.2421(1)
1844.8123(0)
1852.3064(0)
1859.7231(-2)
1867.0621(2)
1874.3212(4)
1881.4988(-2)
1895.6075(-9)
1902.5378(5)
1909.3813(6)
1916.1374(0)
1922.8062(-1)
1929.3865(4)
1935.8758(-1)
1942.2739(-1)
1948.5796(-2)
1954.7918(1)
1960.9085(0)
1966.9295(2)
1322.9638(-1)
1326.8777(0)
1330.7645(3)
1334.6233(1)
1338.4546(2)
1342.2576(2)
1346.0313(-6)
1349.7778(2)
1353.4936(-6)
1357.1814(-2)
1360.8387(-5)
1364.4676(8)
1368.0615(-28)
1375.1678(7)
1378.6723(3)
1382.1457(4)
1385.5863(-7)
1388.9965(-2)
1392.3725(-14)
1395.7189(4)
1399.0305(2)
1402.3095(6)
1405.5540(1)
1408.7654(2)
1411.9402(-23)
B001
1799.1204(-2)
1807.0547(-1)
1814.9187(0)
1822.7112(1)
1830.4308(-1)
1838.0768(0)
1845.6480(3)
1853.1426(0)
1860.5598(-2)
1867.8985(-3)
1875.1581(0)
1882.3362(-1)
1896.4452(-4)
1903.3744(2)
1910.2174(2)
1916.9735(0)
1923.6419(2)
1930.2209(1)
1936.7095(-1)
1943.1068(-1)
1949.4111(-4)
1955.6220(-1)
1961.7379(1)
1967.7571(0)
105 × D001
ν˜3
1889.4326(1)
1.535271(1)
1888.5953(1)
1.535269(2)
1371.6311(3)
1.531836(9)
r0 (Å)
a Numbers in parentheses are one standard deviation uncertainties.
030 level. The largest perturbation was at J′ ) 18 for ZnH2 and at
J′ ) 22 for ZnD2. Therefore, only rotational lines corresponding
to J′ ) 0-12 were used in our analysis for the determination
of r0.
Several hot bands of ZnH2 and ZnD2 involving all three
vibrational modes were also identified in the spectra (i.e., 002 f
001, 003 f 002, 101 f 100, 011 f 010, 021 f 020, and so forth).
Small local perturbations were observed in almost all of the hot
bands, and in all cases, the perturbation effects in ZnD2 were smaller
than those in ZnH2. A complete analysis of all of the bands,
including the perturbation effects, is deferred to a later paper. Using
the rotational constants of the 000, 100, 010, and 001 levels, the
equilibrium rotational constant (Be) and the equilibrium bond
distance (re) will be determined for both ZnH2 and ZnD2.
In summary, gaseous ZnH2 and ZnD2 were discovered, and their
vibration-rotation emission spectra were recorded with a Fourier
transform spectrometer. Rotational analysis of the antisymmetric
stretching fundamental bands confirmed the linear structure and
yielded r0 bond distances of 1.535 271(1) and 1.531 836(9) Å for
64ZnH2 and 64ZnD2, respectively.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
a Numbers in parentheses are the observed - calculated values (in units
of 1 × 10-4 cm-1) computed with the constants of Table 2. b J′ and J′′ are
the rotational angular momentum quantum numbers of the 001 and 000
levels, respectively.
in the argon (1870 and 1357 cm-1) and krypton (1861 and 1351
cm-1) matrices5,6 if the matrix shifts are taken into account.
(2) The adjacent rotational lines for ZnH2 and ZnD2 have
alternating 3:1 and 1:2 intensity ratios, respectively, because of the
ortho-para nuclear spin statistical weights associated with hydrogen
and deuterium nuclei.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Natural
Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.
References
(3) The r0 Zn-H bond distance of 1.535 Å determined in this
(1) Breckenridge, W. H.; Wang, J.-H. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 2630-2637.
(2) Breckenridge, W. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 14840-14855.
(3) Barbaras, G. D.; Dillard, C.; Finholt, A. E.; Wartik, T.; Wilzbach, K. E.;
Schlesinger, H. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 4585-4590.
(4) Watkins, J. J.; Ashby, E. C. Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 2350-2354.
(5) Xiao, Z. L.; Hauge, R. H.; Margrave, J. L. High Temp. Sci. 1991, 13,
59-77.
(6) Greene, T. M.; Brown, W.; Andrews, L.; Downs, A. J.; Chertihin, G. V.;
Runeberg, N.; Pyykko¨, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 7925-7934.
(7) Simons, G.; Talaty, E. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 66, 2457-2461.
(8) Tyrrel, J.; Youaklm, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 3568-3572.
(9) Platts, J. A. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2001, 545, 111-118.
(10) Huber, K. P.; Herzberg, G. Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure
IV: Constants of Diatomic Molecules; Van Nostrand: New York, 1979.
(11) Ko¨rsgen, H.; Urban, W.; Brown, J. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 3861-
3869.
study is close to the calculated re value9 of 1.542 Å.
Lines corresponding to the three naturally abundant isotopes of
zinc (64Zn, 66Zn, and 68Zn) were found in both ZnH2 and ZnD2
spectra, but the signal-to-noise ratio of the ZnD2 spectrum was less
than that of ZnH2. The customary energy expression for a linear
triatomic molecule, E(v1,v2,v3, J) ) G(v1,v2,v3) + BvJ(J + 1) -
Dv[J(J + 1)]2, was used in our least-squares fitting program, and
the spectroscopic constants in Table 2 were determined for the 000
64
ground state and the 001 excited state of 64ZnH2, 66ZnH2, and
-
ZnD2. The r0 bond distances were calculated for these isotopologues
using the ground-state rotational constant (B000). The r0 bond
distance of 64ZnD2 is considerably smaller than that of 64ZnH2
(12) Bernath, P. F.; Shayesteh, A.; Tereszchuk, K.; Colin, R. Science 2002,
297, 1323-1324.
64
because the zero-point level of 64ZnD2 lies lower than that of
ZnH2 in the anharmonic potential-energy surface.
-
(13) Shayesteh, A.; Tereszchuk, K.; Bernath, P. F.; Colin, R. J. Chem. Phys.
2003, 118, 3622-3627.
(14) Shayesteh, A.; Appadoo, D. R. T.; Gordon, I.; Bernath, P. F. J. Chem.
Phys. 2003, 119, 7785-7788.
The wavenumber of the antisymmetric stretching mode is close
to three times the wavenumber of the bending mode (i.e., ν3 ≈
3ν2, for both ZnH2 and ZnD2).6 We observed perturbations in the
001 (Σ+u ) level at high J values, which are caused by the nearby
(15) Shayesteh, A.; Appadoo, D. R. T.; Gordon, I.; Bernath, P. F. Can. J. Chem.
2004, 82, 947-950.
JA046050B
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 44, 2004 14357