9-D-Ribityl-1,3,7-trihydro-2,6,8-purinetrione
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 66, No. 25, 2001 8325
N-8 of 11.20 According to this line of reasoning, the
greater potency of 13 versus 11 might reflect more
favorable hydrogen bonding between the 8-keto group of
13 and the amino group of Lys135, which could also
position the Lys135 amino group to participate in a
second hydrogen bond with the oxygen of the 4′-hydroxyl
group of the ribityl side chain (Figure 2).
It seems logical to suspect that an inhibitor of both
lumazine synthase and riboflavin synthase would be a
good candidate for antibiotic drug development, since
resistance would be less likely to emerge against an agent
that is active against more than one enzyme in the
biosynthetic pathway.
Exp er im en ta l Section
5-Eth ylca r ba m oyl-6-D-r ibityla m in ou r a cil (12). A mix-
ture of palladium on charcoal (10%, 0.3 g) in water (50 mL)
was stirred in a hydrogen atmosphere for 5 min. 5-Nitro-6-D-
ribitylaminouracil (9)21 (1.0 g, 3.26 mmol) was added, and the
solution was hydrogenated at room temperature and atmo-
spheric pressure for 12 h to afford intermediate 1. The reaction
mixture was cooled to 0 °C, triethylamine (5 mL), acetonitrile
(25 mL), and ethyl chloroformate (3.0 mL, 31 mmol) were
added, and the mixture was stirred for 10 h. The catalyst was
removed by filtration, and the filtrate was concentrated under
reduced pressure. The residue was applied to a cation-
exchange column (Dowex 50 × 2-200, 30 g) and eluted with
water (200 mL). The fractions were then applied to an anion-
exchange column (Dowex 1 × 2-400) and eluted with water
and 10% aq HCOOH. After concentration of the combined
fractions, the residue was triturated with EtOAc to generate
a precipitate, which was then collected by filtration to yield
12 (0.8 g, 70%) as an amorphous solid: 1H NMR (300 MHz,
D2O) δ 4.08 (q, J ) 7 Hz, 2 H), 3.81 (m, 1 H), 3.69 (m, 2 H),
3.59-3.45 (m, 3 H), 3.39 (m, 1 H), 1.17 (t, J ) 7 Hz, 3 H).
Anal. Calcd for C12H20N4O8‚1.0(H2O)‚0.2(HCO2H): C, 39.41;
H, 5.97; N, 14.82. Found: C, 39.33; H, 5.84; N, 14.78.
9-D-Ribityl-1,3,7-tr ih ydr opu r in e-2,6,8-tr ion e (13). A mix-
ture of 5-ethylcarbamoyl-6-D-ribitylaminouracil (12) (0.20 g,
0.57 mmol) and NaOEt (0.10 g, 1.47 mmol) in ethanol (50 mL)
was heated at reflux for 24 h. After removal of the solvent
under reduced pressure, the residue was purified by anion-
exchange resin column chromatography (Dowex 1 × 2-400,
eluted with distilled water followed by 10% HCOOH) to afford
13 (120 mg, 70%) as an amorphous solid: [R]20D +3.7° (DMSO);
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.50 (s, 1 H), 10.86 (s, 1 H),
10.79 (s, 1 H), 5.10-4.00 (br m, 4 H), 3.89-3.4 (m, 7 H). Anal.
Calcd for C10H14N4O7‚2.0(H2O)‚0.5(HCOOH): C, 34.91; H, 5.30;
N, 15.51. Found: C, 34.67; H, 5.05; N, 15.50.
1,4-Bis[3-(5-eth ylca r ba m oyl-6-D-r ibityla m in ou r a cilyl)]-
bu ta n e (17). A suspension of palladium on charcoal (10%, 0.3
g) in water (20 mL) was stirred in a hydrogen atmosphere for
5 min. 1,4-Bis[3-(5-nitro-6-ribitylaminouracilyl)butane (15)18
(0.8 g, 1.2 mmol) and triethylamine (1 mL) were added, and
the solution was hydrogenated at room temperature and
atmospheric pressure for 12 h to afford intermediate 16. The
reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C, triethylamine (1 mL),
acetonitrile (5 mL), and ethyl chloroformate (1.0 mL, 11 mmol)
were added, and the mixture was stirred for 10 h at room
temperature. The catalyst was removed by filtration, and the
filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue
was triturated with ethyl acetate to give a white precipitate,
which was collected by filtration. It was dissolved in H2O (5
mL), applied on a cation-exchange column (Dowex 50 × 2-200,
20 g), and eluted with water (100 mL). After concentration of
the combined fractions, the residue was triturated with H2O/
EtOH, and then collected by filtration to provide 17 (0.55 g,
61%) as an amorphous solid: 1H NMR (D2O) δ 4.08 (q, J ) 7
Hz, 4 H), 3.82 (m, 2 H), 3.7-3.5 (m, 14 H), 3.35 (m, 2 H), 1.48
(m, 4 H), 1.17 (t, J ) 7 Hz, 6 H).
F igu r e 1. Linweaver-Burk plots of the inhibition of lumazine
synthase and riboflavin synthase by compound 13. (A) Lu-
mazine synthase. The concentration of the substrate 2 ranges
from 17 to 166 µM. Inhibitor concentrations: 0, 862; (, 431;
b, 259; 9, 172; O, 86; 4, 0 µM. (B) Riboflavin synthase. The
concentration of the substrate 3 ranged from 17 to 166 µM.
Inhibitor concentrations: 0, 40; (, 20; b, 12; 9, 8; O, 4; 4, 0
µM. The initial velocities of product formation, v, were
determined at steady-state conditions with varying amounts
of substrate, s, and inhibitor. The kinetic data were fitted with
a nonlinear regression method using the program DynaFit
from P. Kuzmic.27 Different kinetic models were considered.
The most likely inhibition mechanisms found were partial
inhibition for lumazine synthase and strictly competitive
inhibition for riboflavin synthase.
riboflavin synthase is significantly lower than that
observed for the nearest-ranking compound, the D,L-
dithiothreitol adduct 26 (Ki 15 µM). Likewise, both 9
(Ki ) 43 µM) and 13 (Ki ) 46 µM) are significantly more
potent as lumazine synthase inhibitors than the next-
ranking compound, the phosphonate 31c (Ki ) 130 µM).
It is interesting to compare the activities of the
ribitylxanthine 10 (Ki 470 µM), the corresponding ribi-
tylazapurine 11 (Ki 330 µM), and the ribitylpurinetrione
13 (Ki 46 µM) versus lumazine synthase. We had previ-
ously proposed that the slightly more potent activity of
11 in comparison to 10 might reflect the possible elec-
trostatic interaction between the positively charged
Lys135 primary ammonium ion and the N-8 nitrogen of
11, as well as a possible hydrogen bond between the
Lys135 amino group and the nonbonded electron pair on
1,4-Bis[1-(9-D-r ibityl-1,3,7-tr ih ydr opu r in e-2,6,8-tr ion yl)]-
bu ta n e (18). Sodium (0.1 g, 4.3 mmol) was dissolved in