COORDINATION OF N-SUBSTITUTED PORPHYRINS
331
[Zn(DMSO)5Ac]+Ac– or [Zn(DMSO)6]2+Ac2– , cannot
form in the DMSO solution. On the contrary, since the
Zn–NO3 bond is weaker, Zn(NO3)2 more readily forms
coordination sphere of the N-substituted metal com-
plex.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
outer-sphere
complex
solvates
such
as
[Zn(DMSO)6]2+(NO3)–2 [28].
This work was supported by the RF Ministry of
Education (project no. E00-5.0-129).
We have discovered that the nitrate anion inhibits
the reaction of complex formation. For instance, the
rate of the reaction of H(N-Me)TPP (IV) with
Zn(NO3)2 is 38 times, while that of H(N-Ph)TPP (V)
with Zn(NO3)2 is 5.5 times, as low as that with ZnAc2.
At the same time, the complexation with H(N-
Me)OEtP (III) exhibits no abnormalities and the rate of
reaction with Zn(NO3)2 is 5 times as high as that with
ZnAc2. One should note that reaction (1) was always
conducted under the same conditions; i.e., the structure
of the Zn(NO3)2 complex solvate remained unchanged.
This fact indicates that the mechanism of complexation
of the N-substituted porphyrins strongly depends not
only on the nature of the metal ion, salt anions, the
structure of the complex sovate, and on the nature of the
solvent, but also on the nature of the substituents on the
periphery of the molecule (the sensitivity of the salt sol-
vate to the nature of H2P). In addition, the types of dis-
tortion of molecules III and IV (their most stable con-
formations) are likely to differ significantly, while the
reaction centers of the Zn(NO3)2 complex solvate read-
just to the reaction centers of porphyrin more easily in
the case of III than in the case of IV.
When a simple Zn2+ salt is replaced by a chelate salt,
for example, Zn(Acac)2, the mechanism of complex-
ation becomes more involved [31] and, hence, the pro-
cess slows down. The reaction of complexation of
Zn(Acac)2 or other chelate salts (dithizonate, diphenyl-
carbazonate) with the planar porphyrins in DMSO does
not almost occur [31]. All of the three investigated N-
substituted porphyrins (III–V) react with Zn(Acac)2 at
rates which are 5–30 times lower than those with ZnAc2
and 8–25 times lower than with Zn(NO3)2 except for
(III).
The authors are grateful to P.A. Stuzhin (the associ-
ate professor of the Organic Chemistry Chair in the
Ivanovo State Academy of Chemical Technology) for
the provision of instrument time (Hitachi U-2000).
REFERENCES
1. Lavallee, D.K., Chemistry and Biochemistry of N-Sub-
stituted Porphyrins, New York: VHC Publishers, 1987.
2. De Matteis, F., Gibbs, A.H., and Harvey, C., Biochem. J.,
1985, vol. 226, p. 537.
3. Ortiz De Montellano, P.R., Beilan, H.S., and Kunze K.L.,
J. Biol. Chem., 1981, vol. 256, no. 13, p. 6708.
4. Guldi, D.M., Neta, P., Hambright, P., and Rahnimi, R.,
Inorg. Chem., 1992, vol. 31, no. 23, p. 4849.
5. Al-Hazimi, H.M.G., Jackson, A.H., Johnson, A.W., and
Winter, M., Perkin Trans I, 1977, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 98.
6. Senge, M.O., Kalisch, W.W., and Runge, S., Ann. Chem.,
1997, p. 1345.
7. Callot, H.J., Cromer, R., Louati, A., et al., J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1987, vol. 109, no. 10, p. 2946.
8. Gross, Z. and Galili, N., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
1999, vol. 38, no. 16, p. 2366.
9. Stolzenberg, A.M., Simerly, S.W., Steffey, B.D., and
Haymond, G.S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, vol. 119,
no. 49, p. 11843.
10. Krattinger, B. and Callot, H.J., J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1996, no. 11, p. 1341.
11. Chmielewski, P.J. and Latos-Grazynski, L., Perkin Trans 2,
1995, vol. 91, p. 503.
12. Abeysekera, A.J., Grigg, R., and Trocha-Grimshaw, J.,
Tetrahedron, 1980, vol. 36, p. 1857.
13. Khanampiryan, A.K., Bhardwaj, N., and Leznoff, C.C.,
J. Porph. and Phtaloc., 2000, vol. 4, no. 5, p. 484.
The mechanism of H2P complexation with the che-
late salts is complicated by the competition of two
ligands, namely, the chelate ligand (Acac) and the mac-
rocyclic ligand (H2P), for the coordination of the metal
ion [14]. The data in Table 3 show that the solvation of
the transition state in the reaction of the N-substituted
porphyrins with Zn(Acac)2 occurs, as a rule, more dif-
ficultly than that with the simple salts. The explanation
is that the coordination site of the porphyrin molecule
is shielded by the bulky acetylacetonate ion.
14. Lomova, T.N. and Berezin, D.B., Problemy khimii ras-
tvorov (TRaNS1), Kutepov, A.M., Ed., Moscow: Nauka,
p. 326.
15. Lavallee, D.K. and Anderson, O.P., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1982, vol. 104, no. 17, p. 4707.
16. Aizawa, S., Tsuda, Y., Ito, Y., et al., Inorg. Chem., 1993,
vol. 32, no. 7, p. 1119.
17. Tung, J.-Y., Chen, J.-H., and Liao, F.-L., Inorg. Chem.,
vol. 39, no. 10, p. 2120.
18. Berezin, D.B., Tezisy dokladov II Mezhdunarodnoi kon-
ferentsii “Problemy khimii i khimicheskoi tekhnologii:
“Khimiya-99”, Ivanovo: IGKhTU, 1999, p. 101.
The data in Table 2 reveal that the nature of the A
counterion in the N-substituted complex (A)Zn(N-X)P
only slightly affects the position of the first band in its
electronic absorption spectrum. Depending on the
nature of the counterion (Ac–, Acac–, NO3– ), this band
shifts only by 1.5–4 nm, although A enters the inner
19. Bain-Askerman, M.J. and Lavallee, D.K., Inorg. Chem.,
1979, vol. 18, no. 12, p. 3358.
20. Berezin, B.D., Koordinatsionnye soedineniya porfirinov
i ftalotsianina (Coordination Compounds of Porphyrines
and Phthalocyanine), Moscow: Nauka, 1978.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF COORDINATION CHEMISTRY Vol. 28 No. 5 2002