160
J. Selvakumar et al.
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
Conclusion
0
Sc(acac)3 (1)
Sc(tmhd)3 (2)
The sublimation and evaporation of precursors (1) and (2)
were studied applying the isothermal and non-isothermal
thermogravimetry measurements. The isothermal subli-
mation and vaporization activation energy values are found
to be 81 2, 95 3 kJ mol-1(Ea(sub)) for (1) and (2),
75 3 kJ mol-1 (Ea(vap)) for (2), respectively.
-2
-4
-6
Acknowledgement The authors thank Department of Science and
Technology (DST), Government of India (No. SR/S3/ME/03/2005-
SERC) for the financial assistance.
-8
0.0020
0.0022
0.0024
0.0026
0.0028
0.0030
References
K/T
1. Lim BS, Rahtu A, Park JS, Gordon RG. Synthesis and charac-
terization of volatile, thermally stable, reactive transition metal
amidinates. Inorg Chem. 2003;42:7951–8.
Fig. 6 Isothermal temperature based plots of ln (da/dt)m versus 1/T
for Sc(acac)3 and Sc(tmhd)3
2. Li Z, Barry ST, Gordon RG. Synthesis and characterization of
copper(I) amidinates as precursors for atomic layer deposition
(ALD) of copper metal. Inorg Chem. 2005;44:1728–35.
3. Mehrotra RC, Bohra R, Gaur DP. Metal b-diketonates and allied
derivatives. London Ltd.: Academic Press Inc.; 1978.
4. Huang Y, Cheng Y, Alexander K, Dollimore D. The thermal
analysis study of the drug captopril. Thermochim Acta. 2001;
367–368:43–58.
5. Keuleers RR, Janssens JF, Desseyn HO. Comparison of some
methods for activation energy determination of thermal decom-
position reactions by thermogravimetry. Thermochim Acta. 2002;
385:127–42.
6. Vyazovkin S, Wight CA. Isothermal and nonisothermal reaction
kinetics in solid: in search of ways toward consensus. J Phys
Chem. 1997;101:8279–84.
7. Chrissafis K. Kinetics of thermal degradation of polymers. J
Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;95:273–83.
8. Vyazovkin S. Model-free kinetics. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2007;
83:45–51.
9. Vyazovkin S, Wight CA. Model-free and model-fitting approa-
ches to kinetic analysis of isothermal and nonisothermal data.
Thermochim Acta. 1999;340–341:53–68.
10. Jingyan S, Jie L, Yun D, Ling H, Xi Y, Zhiyong W, et al.
Investigation of thermal behavior of nicotinic acid. J Therm Anal
Calorim. 2008;93:403–9.
11. Hammond GS, Nouhebel DS, Wu CHS. Preparation and prop-
erties of chelates containing sterieally hindered ligands. Inorg
Chem. 1963;2:73–6.
12. Arockiasamy S, Johnson MG, Mallika C, Sreedharan OM, Na-
garaja KS. Spectral characterisation of five volatile bis(N-R-sal-
icylaldimine)nickel(II) (where n-R = methyl to pentyl) complexes
and single crystal study on methyl analogue. Mater Chem Phys.
2008;114:456–61.
13. Antony Premkumar P, Pankajavalli R, Sreedharan OM, Raghu-
nathan VS, Nagaraja KS. Determination of vapour pressure and
standard enthalpies of sublimation and vapourisation of N,N0-
ethylenebis(2,4-pentanedion-iminoato)nickel(II) by a TG-based
transpiration method. Mater Lett. 2004;58:2256–60.
14. Antony Premkumar P, Nagaraja KS, Pankajavalli R, Mallika C,
Sreedharan OM. DTA studies on the liquidus temperatures of Cr
complex with the addition of an anhydrous Ni complex. Mater
Lett. 2004;58:474–7.
Isothermal kinetics
According to the Eq. 5 the activation energy of sublimation
for (1) and (2) is determined and summarized in Table 1.
The activation energy for both compounds is derived from
the plot of ln(da/dt)m versus 1/T (Fig. 6). The plot of ln(da/
dt)m versus 1/T is fit for (2) with two temperature spans,
which is separated by melting temperature and is repre-
sented with sublimation and vaporization kinetics of the
compound. Multiplying the slope of the isothermal plots by
universal gas constant (8.314 J K-1 mol-1), values of
81 2 kJ mol-1 (375–450 K) and 95 3 kJ mol-1
(356–414 K) could be derived for the activation energy of
isothermal sublimation for (1) and (2), respectively. The
activation energy of isothermal vaporization was found to
be 75 3 kJ mol-1 (434–465 K) for 2.
Table 1 show that the two kind of non-isothermal tech-
niques, Flynn–Wall and Kissinger, afford similar activation
energies of sublimation for both scandium complexes.
However, it is interesting that the activation energy values
of of isothermal vaporisation (75 3 kJ mol-1 (434–
465 K)) and non-isothermal process, Flynn–Wall (73
2 kJ mol-1
) ) techniques
and Friedman (79 kJ mol-1
afforded, almost the same as the activation energy derived
by Kissinger (67 5 kJ mol-1) technique for precursor
(2). Nevertheless, the Ea values derived for precursor (1)
shows dissimilarity with the values from non-isothermal
and isothermal techniques. The Ea values of precursors (1)
and (2) calculated by Flynn–Wall technique, the constant Ea
values over the different conversions (0.1–0.8), revealed
that the non-isothermal TG processes are diffusion con-
trolled. The above results imply that the sublimation char-
acteristics could vary with the heating method, sample size
and temperature range.
15. Gao X, Chen D, Dollimore D. The correlation between the value
of a at the maximum reaction rate and the reaction mechanisms: a
theoretical study. Thermochim Acta. 1993;223:75–82.
123