a large excess of Li+ (50.0 mM) also has negligible influence
on the luminescence of the probe. Importantly, Importantly,
the subsequent addition of 20 mM KOAc restores the two-fold
increase in luminescence, demonstrating that the presence of
competing cations does not affect the determination of K+
concentration. (see ESIz).
In conclusion, we have developed a novel lanthanide-based
luminescent probe for the detection of potassium in water at
neutral pH. This probe presents high affinity for K+ in the
mM range and good selectivity over Na+ and physio-
logically relevant cations including Ca2+, Mg2+ and Li+.
Advantageously, this probe presents long luminescence life-
time which readily enables time-gating imaging. Notably, it is
also the first ratiometric luminescent probe for K+; the
Eu-centered luminescence is dependent on the K+ concentra-
tion if the probe is excited at 265 nm but independent of it if
excited at 400 nm. The ratiometric response enables a more
accurate determination of K+ levels in solutions.
Fig. 4 Selectivity of Eu-KPhen (1) for K+ over physiological cations
at typical serum concentrations. Time-gated emission spectra (1) in
water (black) and in the presence of 50.0 mM Li+ (blue), 0.83 mM
Mg2+ (green), 2.47 mM Ca2+ (yellow), 107 mM Na+ (orange) and
10 mM K+ (red). Experimental conditions: [Eu-KPhen] = 50.0 mM,
25 mM aqueous OAcꢁ buffer, pH 7, excitation at 267 nm, emission at
593 nm, time delay = 0.1 ms, T = 20 1C.
whereby any background luminescence from a biological
media, which typically has a lifetime shorter than the ms range,
is advantageously cut-off.10 This techniques further improves
the accuracy of the probe in biological applications.
Moreover, the large Stokes’ shift of the complex (excitation
at 267 nm, emission at 593 nm) and the negligible overlap
between the absorption and the emission spectra, limit any
self-absorption problems at high concentration. Taken
together, these advantages render Eu-KPhen (1) a promising
candidate for imaging extra-neuronal potassium fluxes during
an action potential.
This research was supported by the University of
Minnesota.
Notes and references
1 R. Crossley, Z. Goolamali, J. J. Gosper and P. G. Sammes,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1994, 513–520.
2 R. Crossley, Z. Goolamali and P. G. Sammes, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 1994, 1615–1623; A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N.
Gunaratne and K. R. A. S. Sandanayake, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1990, 31, 5193–5196; A. P. deSilva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne,
T. Gunnlaugsson, A. J. M. Huxley, C. P. McCoy,
J. T. Rademacher and T. E. Rice, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 1515–1566.
3 T. Gunnlaugsson and J. P. Leonard, Chem. Commun., 2003,
2424–2425; T. Gunnlaugsson and J. P. Leonard, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans., 2005, 3204–3212.
4 C. Li, G. L. Law and W. T. Wong, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 4841–4844.
5 P. Padmawar, X. M. Yao, O. Bloch, G. T. Manley and
A. S. Verkman, Nat. Methods, 2005, 2, 825–827; W. Namkung,
P. Padmawar, A. D. Mills and A. S. Verkman, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 7794–7795; M. Magzoub, P. Padmawar, J. A. Dix and
A. S. Verkman, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 21216–21221;
R. C. Helgeson, B. P. Czech, E. Chapoteau, C. R. Gebauer,
A. Kumar and D. J. Cram, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111,
6339–6350; H. R. He, M. A. Mortellaro, M. J. P. Leiner,
R. J. Fraatz and J. K. Tusa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,
1468–1469.
6 A. Thibon and V. C. Pierre, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 434–435.
7 D. Parker, K. Senanayake and J. A. G. Williams, Chem. Commun.,
1997, 1777–1778; D. Parker, P. K. Senanayake and J. A. G.
Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1998, 2129–2139;
D. Parker and J. A. G. Williams, Chem. Commun., 1998, 245–246.
8 R. M. Izatt, K. Pawlak, J. S. Bradshaw and R. L. Bruening,
Chem. Rev., 1991, 91, 1721–2085; V. J. Gatto and G. W. Gokel,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 8240–8244; V. J. Gatto,
K. A. Arnold, A. M. Viscariello, S. R. Miller and G. W. Gokel,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, 27, 327–330; V. J. Gatto, K. A. Arnold,
A. M. Viscariello, S. R. Miller, C. R. Morgan and G. W. Gokel,
J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 5373–5384.
For application in neuroimaging, however, a potassium
probe must also be highly selective for potassium over sodium.
The extracellular concentration of potassium is 3.5–5.3 mM
whereas that of sodium is 135–148 mM. There is therefore a
30–40 fold excess of sodium in the extracellular matrix. As can
be seen in Fig. 3, the selectivity of Eu-KPhen (1) for K+ over
Na+ is significantly higher than that of most crown and lariat
ethers, which typically demonstrate 5–10 fold selectivity for
the larger alkali cation.8 The time-gated luminescence intensity
of the probes increases 83% upon addition of K+ and
plateaus at 10 mM, whereas negligible turn on is observed
with a similar range of sodium concentrations (Fig. 3).
A typical extracellular concentration of 137 mM Na+, increases
the luminescence by 35%. In comparison, the luminescence
intensity of Tsien’s PBFI probe11 and Crossley’s CD18 probe1
in the presence of 10 mM K+ is similar to that of 125 mM Na+.
The higher selectivity for K+ vs. Na+ and the ratiometric
aspect of Eu-KPhen (1) renders it a more promising candidate
for the intended long-term application of imaging neuron
activity.
The selectivity of Eu-KPhen (1) for K+ over other
physiological cations including Ca2+, Mg2+ and Li+ is shown
in Fig. 4. Typical serum concentration of the alkali earth9
Ca2+ (2.47 mM) and Mg2+ (0.83 mM) do not significantly
affect the response of the probe. Ca2+ increases the luminescence
intensity by 9% whereas Mg2+ increases it by 3%. Addition of
9 J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Springer,
New York, 2006.
10 A. Thibon and V. C. Pierre, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2009, 394,
107–120; E. J. New, D. Parker, D. G. Smith and J. W. Walton,
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2010, 14, 238–246; J. C. G. Bunzli, Chem.
Rev., 2010, 110, 2729–2755.
11 A. Minta and R. Y. Tsien, J. Biol. Chem., 1989, 264, 19449–19457.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 541–543 543