Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
23
(
entry 1, Table 1). The use of biotinylated Rh cofactor as
Scheme 2. (a) Proposed Mechanism; (b) Labelling
catalyst provides 4aa in 15% yield. Incorporation of the
cofactor into wt tSav leads to further diminished yields and
very low selectivities (entry 3, Table 1). Similarly, a mutant
tSav (N118 K/K121E) that proved to be a highly reactive ArM
Experiment; (c) Mutational Study
14
in our previous work did not provide the desired δ-lactam
4aa) in appreciable yield (Table 1, entry 4). In an effort to
(
improve the reaction, we turned our attention to monomeric
streptavidin (mSav, Figure 1-iv). We reasoned that the use of
mSav, with a more exposed Rh binding site relative to tSav,
could serve as a competent ArM template, and may simplify
ArM tuning and analysis. Like tSav, biotin is bound tightly by
2
4−26
mSav (K ∼ 2 nM
) but has been engineered to resist
D
tetramerization by replacing hydrophobic amino-acid residues
at the barrel−barrel interface with charged ones.
biotin
In the event, 1 mol % wt-mSav:Cp*
RhCl ArM in
2
acetate buffer enables the coupling of acrylamide (2a) and
para-methoxystyrene (3a) to provide the desired δ-lactam
(
1
4aa) in 44% yield and 92% enantiomeric excess (ee), (Table
, entry 5). A modest increase in metalloenzyme catalyst
27
loading results in substantially higher yield and virtually
identical selectivity, delivering the desired δ-lactam (4aa) in
9
9% yield and 91% ee (Table 1, entry 6). The use of 100 mM
NaCl in place of acetate buffer leads to 58% yield (Table 1,
entry 7).
The wt-mSav:Cp*biotinRhCl2 catalyzed reaction proved
broadly tolerant to the coupling partners employed (Scheme
1
). With respect to the styrene partner (Scheme 1a),
enantioselectivities are best with para-substituted styrenes,
regardless of electronic character. Meta-substituted styrenes are
also tolerated, affording good to high enantioselectivities, while
a single ortho-substituted styrene leads to somewhat decreased
selectivity. Styrene itself is a poor substrate, proceeding in
modest selectivity and yield (4ab). Importantly, all substrates
give the desired δ-lactam products as single regioisomers.
Substitution on the acrylamide is well tolerated regardless of
steric demand affording product with enantioselectivities that
match the corresponding methacrylamide system (Scheme
a
Reaction conditions: 2a (3.0 μmol), 3 (1.5 μmol), catalyst, in 200
μL of acetate buffer (62.5 mM NaOAc, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) with
b
1
3
μL of MeOH, at 25 °C for 72 h. Yields determined by H NMR
analysis relative to a trimethyl(phenyl)silane internal standard.
ArM featuring wt-mSav, the Y112A mutant provides the
desired product in low yield and enantiomeric excess (37% and
61%, respectively). This observation is consistent with its likely
role as a rigidifying element through π-stacking to the Cp
framework on the catalyst.
In order to derivatize the resulting δ-lactam products into
piperidines, the coupling of 2a and 3a to provide 4aa was
performed at a 0.15 mmol scale providing identical results to
the reaction performed on a 1.5 μmol scale (99% yield, 91%
ee) (Scheme 3a). Hydrogenation of 4aa affords the reduced
lactam 6aa in 99% yield and 10:1 dr. Subsequent reduction of
6aa with LiAlH furnishes the desired piperidine 5aa in 81%
yield and 7:1 dr (Scheme 3).
Indeed, the derivatization can proceed under exceedingly
mild reduction conditions. Treatment of a range of δ-lactams
(6) formed in good diastereoselectivity following hydro-
genation with BH ·SMe provides the corresponding piper-
1
b). However, aryl- and alkoxy- substitution results in
diminished yields (4ca, 4ea and 4ed).
28
17,29
A plausible catalytic cycle for this reaction is proposed in
Scheme 2. Metalation of the amide by rhodium generates
intermediate I. C−H activation occurs, presumably via a
concerted-metalation deprotonation (CMD) mechanism,
providing five-membered rhodacycle II. A deuterium labeling
experiment illustrates that the C−H activation step is
reversible, suggesting that the concerted metalation/deproto-
nation (CMD) is not the turnover limiting step (Scheme 2b).
Subsequent alkene coordination and migratory insertion would
give seven-membered rhodacycle IV. Available evidence
suggests this step is the enantiodetermining event. N−O
bond cleavage and reductive elimination then occurs to form
transient Rh(III) intermediate V. Protodemetalation regener-
Despite significant decreases in
4
ates the Rh(III) catalyst and closes the catalytic cycle.
biotin
While the Cp*
RhCl cofactor alone delivers the desired
2
3
2
δ-lactam (4aa) with no appreciable selectivity (0% ee, Table 1,
entry 2), its significantly reduced reactivity was a surprise (15%
yield with 3 mol % catalyst loading, compared to 99% yield
with an equivalent of the mSav artificial metalloenzyme). To
begin to evaluate the molecular dictates of reactivity and
idines in good yield and comparable diastereoselectivity to the
LiAlH reduction (Scheme 3b,c). Notably, these reduction
conditions are tolerant of ester functionalities (5fa) with a
slight erosion of diastereoselectivity, likely due to competitive
imine/enamine tautomerization of an intermediate.
4
stereocontrol, we determined that mutation of tyrosine 112
In conclusion, we have developed an artificial metal-
loenzyme that efficiently catalyzes an enantioselective tandem
C−H activation and [4+2] annulation reaction to afford δ-
biotin
(
Y112), which neighbors the putative Cp*
Rh pocket has a
signficant effect on the transformation. In comparison to the
C
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX