C. Sandoval, et al.
Materials Research Bulletin 116 (2019) 8–15
couple ZnFe
2
O
4
and PoPD, which would develop a synergetic phe-
recorded using a Nicolet Nexus 470 FT-IR (Thermo Scientific, USA) in
−1
nomenon that will increase its adsorption in the visible range and
photocatalytic properties. To the best of our knowledge, synthesis of
ZnFe O /PoPD composite with photocatalytic activity, especially to-
2 4
the range of 4000–50 cm . BET analysis was performed by Tristar II
3020 (Micrometrics, USA) at 77 K. Diffuse reflectance spectra were
recorded using a UV-2700 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) with
wards organometallic compound such as TMS, has not been reported
yet.
4
integration sphere (ISR-2600 Plus), using BaSO as a reference (Merck,
Germany). SEM micrographs were obtained using a JSM-6380 LV
(JEOL, Germany) scanning electron microscopy. TEM analysis was
performed by JEM-1200EX II (JEOM, Germany) transmission electron
microscopy with a resolution of 5 Å and 120 kV with a camera F82
(Gatan, USA).
2 4
Therefore, we have attempted to synthesis the ZnFe O /PoPD
composite and have been examined its TMS photocatalytic degradation
activity. The synthesized photocatalysts were characterized by XRD,
FTIR, DRUV visible spectroscopy, SEM, TEM and BET method. The
photocatalytic degradation of TMS was achieved under visible light
illumination. Furthermore, photocatalytic degradation pathway of TMS
has also been proposed.
2.5. Photocatalytic experiment
All the photocatalytic experiments were conducted in a borosilicate
glass reactor with an effective volume of 100 mL, equipped with inlet
and outlet to modify the reaction atmospheric conditions. The con-
2
. Experimental procedure
−1
−1
2.1. Materials
centration of TMS and photocatalyst was 10 mg L
and 100 mg L
respectively. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 4 with hydrochloric
acid (0.01 M) (Merck, Germany). Photodegradation experiment was
3 2
Hydrated zinc nitrate (ZnNO ·4H O), ferrous nitrate (Fe
−2
(
NO
3
)
2
·6H
2
O), glycine (C
H
2 5
NO
2
) and potassium persulfate (K
S
2 2
O
8
)
performed at (Xe lamp) visible light irradiation (2.2 mWcm ). The
distance between the lamp source and the reactor was maintained at
15 cm. To monitor the reaction, samples were taken periodically using
syringe and subsequently subjected to filtration by nitrocellulose
membrane filter with a pore diameter of 0.22 μm (Merck, Germany). A
LAMBDA 25 UV–vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Ltd., USA) was
used for monitoring the UV–vis spectra of TMS during the photo-
catalysis. The equipment operated with a band pass of 1 nm and with
1 cm of optical path using quartz cuvettes.
were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, US. 1,4-phenylenediamine, malonic
acid, thimerosal (≥98.5%), salicylic acid, dithiosalicylic acid, thiosa-
−
1
licylic acid, mercury(II) nitrate (standard 1000 mg L
CertiPUR,
Merck), methanol, ortho-phosphoric acid, sodium borohydride, hydro-
chloric acid and potassium hydroxide were purchased from Merck,
Germany. Ultra-pure water was obtained from EASY water purification
device (Millipore, US). Argon (99.998%) was purchased from Air-
Liquide (Chile).
2
.2. Auto combustion synthesis of ZnFe
2
O
4
nanoparticles
·6H O and glycine as
2.6. Analytical methods
Aqueous solution of ZnNO ·4H O, Fe(NO
3
2
3
)
2
2
The identification of intermediates and degradation products was
performed by HPLC (KNAUER Smartline, Germany) with a UV–vis de-
tector (KNAUER Smartline UV detector 2500) operating at 254 nm and
25 °C. Reverse-phase chromatography was performed w®ith
ignition promoting agent were taken in the ratio of 1:2:1 and mixed
together [16]. The resulting mixture was slowly heated to evaporate the
water and promote the formation of the gel. Then the gel formed was
brought to the auto-combustion temperature of the glycine (263 °C).
Once the combustion process was finished, a calcination step was car-
ried out in an oxidizing atmosphere at 600 °C in order to remove or-
a
150 mm × 4.6 mm LiChroCART column (θ = 5 μm) Purospher STAR
RP-18 endcapped, with pre-column, plus a 20 μL loop (for sample in-
jection). A mobile phase composed of methanol (Merck, Germany),
ultrapure water (Merck, USA) and ortho-phosphoric acid (Merck,
Germany) in the ratio 66: 33: 1 at pH 3 was used. The flow rate was
ganic contents and thus we obtained ZnFe
2 4
O powder.
−1
2.3. Synthesis of ZnFe /PoPD composite
2
O
4
1 mL min . TMS (Merck, Germany) concentration was determined
−1
using an external calibration curve between 1–30 mg L . The mercury
−1
Oxidative polymerization method for the synthesis of ZnFe
PoPD composite was used [17]. The typical synthetic procedure is as
follows: In a 250 mL beaker, 0.48 g of ZnFe in 100 mL of water was
2
O
4
/
(II) nitrate (1000 mg L CertiPUR, Merck, Germany), salicylic acid
(Merck, Germany), thiosalicylic acid and dithiosalicylic acid (Merck,
Germany) were used as standards.
2 4
O
sonicated for 15 min. To this dispersion, 1.046 g malonic acid is added
and the reaction set-up is kept in an ice bath (−4 °C) with constant
stirring. After that, 1.081 g of o-phenylenediamine was added. Finally,
To determine the generation of elemental mercury (Hg(0)) during
photocatalysis, the photocatalytic reactor was connected to the Aurora
Lumina 3300 (Canada) atomic fluorescence spectrometer (AFS) where
the generated Hg(0) was released in to the gas phase by using Ar
2 2 8
100 mL aqueous solution (0.45 g) of K S O was slowly added with
−
1
constant stirring. The resulting reaction mixture was allowed to stand in
cold for 24 h, and then the obtained precipitate was filtered and dried in
an oven at 45 °C for 4 h.
100 mL min as carrier gas. This equipment used an additional make
−
1
up gas in the torch consisting of argon 400 mL min and a shield gas of
−1
200 mL min . For calibration, mercury cold vapor was generated by
reduction of Hg(II) in a 500 mL volumetric flask using a mixture of 20%
2
.4. Characterization techniques
by volume of ultra-pure hydrochloric acid and a 1.5% (w/v) NaBH
4
basic solution (7.5 g of NaBH
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization
4
, 0.05% w/v NaOH to 500 mL of water).
The X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained using a Bruker D4
(
Endeavor, Germany) with Fe Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.9360 Å). Mn filter
for K radiation was used. Data were collected over the 2θ range of
0°–80° with a velocity of 2° min . The average crystallite size (d) was
β
−
1
2
calculated using the Debye-Scherrer equation:
The structure of pure ZnFe
determined by XRD analysis (Fig. 1). All the diffraction peaks of pure
2 4
ZnFe (Fig. 1 pattern a) can be perfectly indexed with spinel ZnFe O
(JCPDS No.: 01-086-0507). The predominant diffraction peaks ob-
served at 2θ = 29.9°, 35.2°, 42.9°, 56.6° and 62.2° can be assigned to
2 4
(220), (311), (400), (511) and (440) crystal planes of spinel ZnFe O
2 4 2 4
O and ZnFe O /PoPD composite was
Kλ
d =
βcosθ
(1)
2
O
4
Where, K is the Scherrer constant (0.9), λ is the wavelength of the X-ray
radiation (λ = 1.9360 Å), β is the full width of half maximum peak and
θ is diffraction angle of most intense peak. The FTIR spectra were
9