4182
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 116, No. 10, 8 March 2002
Zou, Kim, and North
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
where is the predissociation lifetime, is the rotation an-
gular velocity, () is the observed anisotropy parameter,
The authors would like to thank Dr. John Bevan for his
useful comments regarding discharge beam sources. The
technical assistance of Bridget Schmitz is also gratefully ap-
preciated. Support for this project was provided by the Texas
Research Endowment Program and a Research Enhancement
Grant from Texas A&M University.

is the intrinsic anisotropy parameter. For simplicity,
(ϭ0)
we have assumed that all the rotational sublevels have same
predissociation lifetime. The lifetime derived from Eq. ͑12͒
strongly depends on the average angular velocity, , of BrO,
which is determined by the rotational distribution of the BrO
radicals. We have calculated the lifetimes for different rota-
tional temperatures. Lifetime values range from 1.1 to 0.61
ps for rotational temperatures from 5 to 15 K. Therefore, we
1 M. J. Molina and F. S. Rowland, Nature ͑London͒ 249, 810 ͑1974͒.
2 R. R. Garcia and S. Solomon, J. Geophys. Res., ͓Atmos.͔ 99, 12937
͑1994͒.
estimated that the upper limit of the ϭ4 level of BrO
v
Ј
A 2⌸ state was 1.1 ps.
3 S. Solomon, R. R. Garcia, F. S. Rowland, and D. J. Wuebbles, Nature
͑London͒ 321, 755 ͑1986͒.
Wheeler et al.23 and Wilmouth et al.18 have investigated
the predissociation lifetimes of the ͑12,0͒ and ͑7,0͒ transi-
tions of the A 2⌸ X 2⌸ band of BrO by measuring the
lifetime spectra broadening. They also reported that the ab-
sorption bands for all the vibrational levels, except ͑12,0͒
and ͑7,0͒ transitions, are quite diffuse, prohibiting a lifetime
analysis. Therefore, if perpendicular contributions to the ex-
4 P. O. Wennberg et al., Science 266, 398 ͑1994͒.
5 S. R. Langhoff, L. Jaffe, and J. O. Arnold, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat.
Transf. 18, 227 ͑1977͒.
6 P. Zou, B. Schmidt, T. Nguyen, J. Park, and S. W. North, J. Phys. Chem.
͑in press͒.
7 C. M. Nelson, T. A. Moore, M. Okumura, and T. K. Minton, Chem. Phys.
207, 287 ͑1996͒.
8 R. A. Durie and D. A. Ramsay, Can. J. Phys. 36, 35 ͑1958͒.
9 J. A. Coxon and R. A. Ramsay, Can. J. Phys. 54, 1034 ͑1976͒.
10 A. Toniolo, M. Persico, and D. Pitea, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 2790 ͑2000͒.
11 W. H. Howie, I. C. Lane, S. M. Newman, D. A. Johnson, and A. J. Orr-
Ewing, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1, 3079 ͑1999͒.
12 I. C. Lane, W. H. Howie, and A. J. Orr-Ewing, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
1, 3087 ͑1999͒.
citation are negligible at 355 nm, the shorter lifetime of
ϭ4 level, comparing with the results of ϭ12 and 7 levels,
calculated from our measured anisotropy parameters are con-
sistant with previous estimates of the predissociation life-
times.
v
Ј
v
Ј
13 H. F. Davis and Y. T. Lee, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 30 ͑1996͒.
14 S. Schmidt, Th. Benter, and R. N. Schindler, Chem. Phys. Lett. 282, 292
͑1998͒.
15 W. B. DeMore, S. P. Sander, D. M. Golden, R. F. Hampson, M. J. Kurylo,
C. J. Howard, A. R. Ravishankara, C. E. Kolb, and M. J. Molina, ‘‘Chemi-
cal kinetics and photochemical data for use in stratospheric modeling,’’
Evaluation Number 11, NASA JPL Publ. 1994, No. 94-26.
16 Y. Bedjanian, G. Le Bras, and G. Poulet, Chem. Phys. Lett. 266, 233
͑1997͒.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The UV photodissociation dynamics of ClO and BrO
radicals have been studied using REMPI-TOF. We find that
the dominant channel in the photodissociation is Cl(2P3/2
)
ϩO(1D2). The anisotropy of this channel suggests that it
derives from the A 2⌸i state but that contributions from the
2 2⌺ϩ state may be nonnegligible. Channels 3 and 5 are also
observed but are much less significant, constituting
ϳ3%–4% of the products. The Cl(2P1/2)ϩO(3PJ) channel
arises from a predominately parallel transition and the wave-
length invariance of this channel’s yield suggests that it
arises from adiabatic dynamics arising from a weak interac-
tion of the repulsive 3 2⌸i state with the A-state consistent
with recent theoretical predictions.10,12 The similarity of the
results to a previous study at 248 nm suggests that the prod-
uct branching ratios and contributions of excited states are
not strongly dependent on wavelength throughout the con-
tinuum region from 220 to 260 nm.
17 M. K. Gilles, A. A. Turnipseed, J. B. Burkholder, and A. R. Ravishankara,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 272, 75 ͑1997͒.
18 D. M. Wilmouth, T. F. Hanisco, N. M. Donahue, and J. G. Anderson, J.
Phys. Chem. A 103, 8935 ͑1999͒.
19 J. J. Orlando and G. S. Tyndall, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 19398 ͑1996͒.
20 D. R. Hanson, A. R. Ravishankara, and E. R. Lovejoy, J. Geophys. Res.,
͓Atmos.͔ 101, 9063 ͑1996͒.
21 The recommended BrO heat of formation is now 30Ϯ2 kcal/mol; W. B.
DeMore, S. P. Sander, D. M. Golden, R. F. Hampson, M. J. Kurylo, C. J.
Howard, A. R. Ravishankara, C. E. Kolb, and M. J. Molina, ‘‘Chemical
kinetics and photochemical data for use in stratospheric modeling,’’
Evaluation Number 12, NASA JPL Publ. 1997, No. 97-4.
22 Y. Li, J. S. Francisco, and K. A. Peterson, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 8556
͑2000͒.
23 M. D. Wheeler, S. M. Newman, T. Ishiwata, M. Kawasaki, and A. J.
Orr-Ewing, Chem. Phys. Lett. 285, 346 ͑1998͒.
24 W. S. McGivern, R. Li, P. Zou, and S. W. North, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 5771
͑1999͒.
The photodissociation dynamics of BrO have been stud-
ied at 355 nm for the first time using REMPI-TOF. We find
that both excited state and ground state bromine atoms are
produced at this wavelength with a quantum yield of 0.83
Ϯ0.10 and 0.17Ϯ0.1, respectively. The intrinsic anisotropy
parameter of the photofragments suggest excitation to the
A 2⌸i state dominates the oscillator strength at this wave-
length. Based on the measured asymptotic velocity of both
channels we have directly determined the Br–O bond disso-
ciation energy of 55.8Ϯ1.0 kcal/mol, providing a heat of
formation for the BrO radical at 298 K of 29.7Ϯ1.0 kcal/
mol. The rotational depolarization of the photofragment an-
gular distribution allows an estimation of the upper limit of
25 W. C. Wiley and I. H. McLaren, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 26, 1150 ͑1955͒.
26 H. J. Hwang, J. Griffiths, and M. A. El-Sayed, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion
Processes 131, 265 ͑1994͒.
27 R. Ogorzalek-Loo, H.-P. Haerri, G. E. Hall, and P. L. Houston, J. Chem.
Phys. 90, 4222 ͑1989͒.
28 J. A. Syage, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 1007 ͑1996͒.
29 D. T. Anderson, S. Davis, T. S. Zwier, and D. J. Nesbitt, Chem. Phys. Lett.
258, 207 ͑1996͒.
30 M. C. van Beek and J. J. ter Meulen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 337, 237 ͑2001͒.
31 M. J. Cooper, T. Diez-Rojo, L. J. Rogers, C. M. Western, M. N. R. Ash-
fold, and J. W. Hudgens, Chem. Phys. Lett. 272, 232 ͑1997͒.
32 M. M. Ahern, D. A. Steinhurst, and M. A. Smith, Chem. Phys. Lett. 300,
681 ͑1990͒.
33 K. M. Beck, K. A. H. German, and W. P. Hess, Chem. Phys. Lett. 256, 297
͑1996͒.
34 S. Arepalli, N. Presser, D. Robie, and R. J. Gordon, Chem. Phys. Lett. 118,
88 ͑1985͒.
predissociation lifetime of ϭ4 level of 1.1 ps.
v
Ј
130.70.241.163 On: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 02:21:48