Communication
hole mobility in MAPI thin films have been shown to be simi-
lar.[33] Further, the penetration depth of light in MAPI thin films
at 550 nm is 0.66 mm, as measured by Park.[34]
Experimental Section
Preparation of the precursor: Methylammonium iodide was pre-
pared by adapting a recipe published earlier.[38] In short, 24 mL of
methylamine solution (33% in ethanol, Sigma–Aldrich) was diluted
with 100 mL of absolute ethanol in a 250 mL round-bottom flask.
To this solution, 10 mL of hydroiodic acid (33 wt%) was added
under constant stirring. After a reaction time of one hour at room
temperature, the solvents were removed by rotary evaporation.
The obtained white solid was washed with dry diethyl ether and fi-
nally recrystallized from ethanol.
The results extracted from ToF data can be found in Fig-
ure 4d. We note that the experimental error is mainly caused
by the determination of the layer thickness. The slow evapora-
tion of the solvent and the associated formation of uniform
and big crystals of the perovskite for the 40 min at RT sample
can be connected to the enhancement of the mobility of the
charge carriers within the photoactive layer, as observed in the
ToF measurements. The higher mobility in the 40 min at RT
sample is also observable in the J–V characteristic since the
series resistance of the solar cell is lowered, which leads to
a higher fill factor (FF). The series resistance was estimated by
fitting the ohmic regime of the J–V curve and yields
12.5 Wcm2 for the 5 min and 8.2 Wcm2 for the 40 min device.
With this increased conductivity of the sample, the charge ex-
traction by the selective contacts is enhanced, resulting in
higher device efficiency. The results presented here show mo-
bility values two orders of magnitude higher than previous ToF
studies on perovskite solar cells.[35] We note that the morpholo-
gy of the perovskite plays an important role for the mobility,
as demonstrated here, and hence we expect that the much
smaller crystals and thus higher grain boundary density pres-
ent in the previous study account for the discrepancy. On the
other hand, values obtained from THz (8.1 cm2 VÀ1 sÀ1)[36] and
microwave (6.2 cm2 VÀ1 sÀ1)[37] conductivity measurements on
the active perovskite layer only are up to three orders of mag-
nitude higher than the present results that have been ob-
tained for complete devices. We attribute these differences to
the different transport processes and probing dimensions asso-
ciated with THz and microwave measurements, in comparison
with the complete through-layer transport probed with ToF
methods. Moreover, as the ToF measurement probes the entire
device, there could also be a minor influence of the transport
layer (spiro-OMeTAD) and the relevant interfaces on the appar-
ent mobility of the material.
Solar cell preparation: Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)-coated glass
sheets (7 WsqÀ1, Pilkington, USA) were patterned by etching with
zinc powder and 3 M HCl. They were subsequently cleaned with
a 2% Hellmanex solution and rinsed with deionized water, ethanol,
and acetone. Directly before applying the blocking layer, remaining
organic residues were removed by an oxygen plasma treatment
for 5 min. The dense TiO2 layer was prepared from a sol-gel precur-
sor solution by spin-coating onto the substrates and calcining at
5008C in air.[39] For the sol-gel solution a 27.2 mM (70 mL) solution
of HCl in 2-propanol (5 mL) was added dropwise to a vigorously
stirred 0.43 mM (735 mL) solution of titanium isopropoxide
(99.999%, Sigma–Aldrich) in 2-propanol (5 mL). The solution usual-
ly stayed clear during the addition and was discarded otherwise.
The precursor solution for the synthesis of MAPbI3 was prepared
by dissolving 1.685 g of MAI in 4 mL dry N,N-dimethylformamide
(DMF, 99.8%, Sigma–Aldrich). This solution was then added to
973 mg of PbCl2 (98%, Sigma–Aldrich) and heated to 1008C in
order to fully dissolve the lead precursor. Subsequently, 100 mL of
this solution was spin-coated onto the TiO2-covered substrates at
1000 rpm for 45 s. After varying the resting times at RT, the sam-
ples were placed on a hotplate at 908C for 2 h. Afterwards, two ad-
ditional heating steps were performed, first 10 min at 1008C and
then 5 min at 1308C. Next, the films were covered with a layer of
Spiro-OMeTAD (Borun Chemicals, 99.5% purity). Typically, 100 mg
of Spiro-OMeTAD were dissolved in 1 mL chlorobenzene (99.8%,
Sigma–Aldrich). The solution was filtered and mixed with 10 mL 4-
tert-butylpyridine (tBP, 96%, Sigma–Aldrich) and 30 mL of
a
170 mgmLÀ1 bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonamide lithium salt
(LiTFSI, 99.95%, Sigma–Aldrich) solution in acetonitrile. This solu-
tion was spin-coated dynamically at 1500 rpm for 45 s. In a second
step the sample rotation was accelerated to 2000 rpm for 5 s to
allow the solvent to dry completely. Before depositing the gold
electrodes by evaporation, Spiro-OMeTAD was left to oxidize in air
overnight at room temperature and <20%rel humidity.
In summary, we have studied the crystallization of MAPbI3
based on a one-step approach with a chloride-based precursor.
Based on in-situ XRD measurements, we propose a crystalliza-
tion mechanism for the synthesis procedure. Thereby, MAPbCl3
is assembled on the substrate during the slow evaporation of
the solvent, and over time some MAPbI3 crystals are also
formed. While heating up the substrate, MAPbI3 grows at the
expense of MAPbCl3, which leads to crystals oriented parallel
to the substrate. Furthermore, we show that a slow evapora-
tion of the solvent during the formation of the MAPbCl3 tem-
plate influences the morphology, size, and uniformity of the re-
sulting MAPbI3 crystals. Advanced electro-optical characteriza-
tion by time-of-flight studies in this work showed that the
charge-carrier mobility is doubled for devices based on MAPbI3
that were fabricated with more controlled evaporation of the
solvent at RT. This indicates that slow evaporation of the sol-
vent before the heat treatment benefits the solar cell efficiency
through enhanced conductivity and a corresponding increased
device performance.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Steffen Schmidt from the Depart-
ment of Chemistry at the University of Munich (LMU) for the
focused ion beam cross-sections. We acknowledge funding
from the Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Con-
sumer Protection, the Bavarian network “Solar Technologies Go
Hybrid”, and the DFG Excellence Cluster Nanosystems Initiative
Munich (NIM). We gratefully acknowledge support from the Eu-
ropean Union through the award of a Marie Curie Intra-Euro-
pean Fellowship. The authors acknowledge funding from the
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
under the agreement number 01162525/1.
Chem. Asian J. 2016, 11, 1199 – 1204
1203
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim