183106-3
Geng et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 183106 ͑2007͒
nanoparticles, electron transfer to the particle cannot cause a
reduction reaction for the stability of thiol-capped gold nano-
particles and charging the particle double-layer discretely re-
sults in electrochemical analogs of Coulomb staircase charg-
ing. However, transition metal sulfide nanoparticles are not
as stable as Au nanoparticles, and electron transfer process
can cause a series of chemical reactions.19
Figure 4͑b͒ illustrates the CVs of different samples, from
which the different peak-to-peak separations are obviously
observed. The shapes of all CVs are similar, and the current
potentials are shifted slightly as the sizes are varied. The
peak-to-peak separation of sample 1 is about 3.18 V, 3.38 V
for sample 2, and 3.26 V for sample 3, indicating that the
gap between HOMO and LUMO is size dependent, which is
perfectly consistent with the optical band gap.
In summary, ZnS nanorods with different sizes have
been synthesized through a single-source-precursor approach
by controlling the molar ratio of Zn͑Mer͒ and OA or the
2
reaction duration. Optical and electrochemical properties of
different sizes of ZnS nanorods are discussed and size-
dependent optical and electrochemical band gaps are evi-
dently observed, which show a direct correlation between the
electronic spectra and electrochemical band gap.
This work was supported by the National Natural Sci-
ence Foundation of China ͑20671003͒, the Foundation of
Key Project of Natural Science of Anhui Education Commit-
tee ͑2006kj041a͒, the Young Teacher Sustentation Project of
Anhui ͑Grant No. 2005jq1041zd͒, and the Education Depart-
ment of Anhui Province ͑2006KJ006TD͒.
FIG. 4. ͑Color online͒ ͑a͒ CV response in presence of OA-capped ZnS
nanorod ͑1 mg/ml of sample 1͒ at a Au electrode. Sweep rate=100 mV/s
and ͓TBAP͔=0.05 M. ͑b͒ CVs illustrating the electrochemical band gap ͑
A1 −B1 peak separation͒ for all samples. ͓ZnS nanorod͔=1 mg/mL,
͓TBAP͔=0.05 M, and sweep rate=100 mV/s.
1J. Hu, L. S. Li, W. Yang, L. Manna, L. W. Wang, and A. P. Alivisatos,
Science 292, 2060 ͑2001͒.
2J. Park, B. Koo, Y. Hwang, C. Bae, K. An, J.-G. Park, H. M. Park, and T.
Hyeon, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 43, 2282 ͑2004͒.
3E. Monroy, F. Omnes, and F. Calle, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 18, R33
͑2003͒.
4W. Park, J. S. King, C. W. Neff, C. Liddell, and C. Summers, Phys. Status
Solidi B 229, 949 ͑2002͒.
͑3.45 eV͒ for sample 3, indicating that the band gap of the
three kinds of ZnS nanorods is changed slightly with varia-
tion of the size.
5Q. Li and C. R. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 359 ͑2003͒.
6Y. Jiang, X. M. Meng, J. Liu, Z. Y. Xie, C. S. Lee, and S. T. Lee,
Adv. Mater. ͑Weinheim, Ger.͒ 15, 323 ͑2003͒.
Figure 4͑a͒ shows a typical CV for sample 1 at the Au
electrode. It is noteworthy that ZnS nanorods with different
sizes synthesized in this letter have good solubility in
nanoparticles which have size-dependent solubility.17 The
peak currents increased as the concentration of ZnS nanarods
was enhanced and the peak potential without notable change.
From the CV, several prominent oxidation and reduction
peaks are located between −1.42 V ͑A1͒ and 1.74 V ͑B2͒;
furthermore, A2, A3 and B2, B3 appeared only after scan re-
versal passing B1 and A1, which confirmed that B1 reduction
products were reoxidized at A2 and A3 and A1 oxidation
products were reduced at B2 and B3. These might correspond
to ZnS/Zn and ZnS/S couples. The peak-to-peak separation
between A1 and B1 is 3.12 V and is a useful correlation of
electron spectra because the separation is caused by the tran-
sition of electrons between highest occupied molecular or-
bital ͑HOMO͒ and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital
͑LUMO͒. Chen et al. have observed a similar correlation
alkanethiol-capped gold nanoparticles.18 In the case of Au
7S. H. Yu and M. Yoshimura, Adv. Mater. ͑Weinheim, Ger.͒ 14, 296
͑2002͒.
8X. C. Jiang, Y. Xie, J. Lu, L. Y. Zhu, W. He, and Y. T. Qian, Chem. Mater.
13, 1213 ͑2001͒.
9Y. Jiang, X. M. Meng, J. Liu, Z. R. Hong, C. S. Lee, and S. T. Lee,
Adv. Mater. ͑Weinheim, Ger.͒ 15, 1195 ͑2003͒.
10X. Wang, J. Zhuang, Q. Peng, and Y. Li, Nature ͑London͒ 437, 121
͑2005͒.
11Y. Li, X. Li, C. Yang, and Y. Li, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 16002 ͑2004͒.
12P. D. Cozzoli, A. Kornowski, and H. Weller, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 2638
͑2005͒.
13Y. C. Zhang, G. Y. Wang, X. Y. Hu, and W. W. Chen, Mater. Res. Bull. 41,
1817 ͑2006͒.
14J. Rockenberger, E. C. Scher, and A. P. Alivisatos, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
121, 11595 ͑1999͒.
15J. H. Yu, J. Joo, H. M. Park, S. Baik, Y. W. Kim, S. C. Kim, and T. Hyeon,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 5662 ͑2005͒.
16JCPDS-International Center for Diffraction Data No. 80-0007.
17S. K. Haram, B. M. Quinn, and A. J. Bard, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 8860
͑2001͒.
18S. Chen, R. S. Ingrma, M. J. Hostwtler, J. J. Pietron, R. W. Murray, T. G.
Schaaff, J. T. Khoury, M. M. Alvarez, and R. L. Whetten, Science 280,
2098 ͑1998͒.
19S. Chen, L. A. Truax, and J. M. Sommers, Chem. Mater. 12, 3864 ͑2000͒.
142.244.5.147 On: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 03:50:23