˚
O. Langvik et al.
144
character of the catalyst material sticking to all filter
materials investigated.
scanning system equipped with a secondary and back-
scattered electron detector.
2.3 Analysis
3 Results and Discussion
Samples (0.15 mL) from the reactor were taken periodi-
cally through a gas tight septum, filtered using a 0.2 lm
syringe filter and diluted with three parts of the same sol-
vent after which 1 lL of the solution was injected to the
gas chromatograph. The product distribution was moni-
tored by GC and GC/MS. The GC apparatus used was
Agilent Technologies 6850 GC equipped with a Varian
CP-7502 column (25.0 m 9 250 lm 9 0.25 lm), He as a
carrier gas, FID detector and the following temperature
3.1 Hydrogenation of 1,2-Indanedione
All experiments were preceded by in situ pretreatment of
the catalyst at elevated temperatures (250 °C for Pd;
400 °C for Pt) under hydrogen atmosphere (1 atm). Three
different catalyst concentrations, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 mol%,
were used for determining the initial reaction rates. The
samples were withdrawn in the beginning of the reaction
when the concentration of the starting material decreased
linearly (supporting information, Fig. S1). When the cal-
culated initial rates were plotted against the catalyst con-
centration, a linear correlation was obtained confirming
that the reaction proceeds without external (gas/liquid)
mass transfer limitations (supporting information, Fig. S2).
Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) was initially selected as
a solvent for the hydrogenation experiments being suc-
cessfully used in our earlier published DKR of rac-2 [17].
However, in the hydrogenation experiments, when 1 was
used as the starting material, MTBE was not sufficiently
efficient for reliable and practical operation. By switching
the solvent to ethyl acetate (EA) better reproducibility and
more reliable results were obtained.
program: injector 230 °C, detector 280 °C, oven Tinitial
=
130 °C (0 min), rate 2.2 °/min, Tfinal = 185 °C (10 min).
The GC/MS apparatus used was Agilent Technologies
7890 A GC equipped with 5975 C MS detector (EI),
HP-5MS column (30 m 9 250 lm 9 0.25 lm), He as a
carrier gas and the following temperature program: injector
250 °C, oven Tinitial = 90 °C (0 min), rate 7 °C/min,
Tfinal = 280 °C, hold 2 min. The NMR spectra of the
isolated compounds were recorded on a Bruker Avance
600 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a BBI-5 mm-
Zgrad–ATM probe at 25 °C operating at 600.13 MHz for
1H and 150.92 MHz for 13C.
The metal dispersion was determined by applying CO
pulse chemisorption method using Micromeritics Auto-
Chem 2900 apparatus. Pd and Pt dispersions were calcu-
lated assuming an adsorption stoichiometry of 1/1 for both
CO/Pd and CO/Pt, respectively [33, 34]. The specific sur-
face areas of the fresh and the used Pd/Al2O3 catalysts were
measured by nitrogen physisorption using an automatic
physisorption apparatus (Sorptomatic 1900, Carlo Erba
Instruments). BET method was used for calculations of
the surface areas. The catalysts were degassed prior to the
surface area measurements in vacuum at 150 °C. The
inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry
(ICP–OES; PerkinElmer, Optima 5300 DV) was performed
at 340.458 nm. For the ICP–OES analysis, the solid cata-
lyst was removed by filtration through a small pad of Celite
and the remaining solution was concentrated to 1/10 of its
original volume. Of the obtained sample, 0.5 g was trans-
ferred to a Teflon bomb and 6 mL of HNO3 (65 %) and
1 mL of H2O2 (30 %) were added. Next, the sample was
digested in a microwave oven (Anton Paar, Multiwave
3000) and diluted to 100 mL volume with deionized water
(18 MX) prior to analysis. The thermogravimetric analyses
were performed using a DSC–TGA (TA Instruments, Q
Series instrument) and the analyses were performed under
nitrogen atmosphere using a heating rate of 5 °C/min.
SEM–EDXA analysis was performed by using a LEO 1530
The performance of three different catalysts, Pt/Al2O3
(123), Pt/Al2O3 (5R94) and Pd/Al2O3 was investigated in
the hydrogenation of 1. With the Pd and Pt catalysts
(2 mol%, 51.3 mg Pd/Al2O3 or 93.6 mg Pt/Al2O3), 1 was
converted to rac-2 in high selectivity (99 %) at up to 50 %
conversion. While with increasing conversion the selec-
tivity decreased, acceptable selectivities (92–94 %) were
obtained with Pd/Al2O3 at 75–80 % conversion (Fig. 2).
For chemoselective hydrogenations of carbonyl com-
pounds, heterogeneous Pt catalysts have been more fre-
quently used compared to Pd [35]. Heterogeneous Pd
systems are commonly employed catalysts for hydrogena-
tion of C–C double bonds whereas earlier examples of
their use in selective carbonyl reductions are less frequent
[35–37].
The metal dispersions and the corresponding average
metal particle sizes of the catalysts and the BET specific
surface areas are shown in Table 1. The initial turn over
frequency (TOF) values, calculated based on the 10 min
sample, were similar for both Pt/Al2O3 and Pd/Al2O3 cat-
alysts (Table 1). Pd exhibited slightly higher metal dis-
persion compared with the two Pt catalysts but the TOF
values did not depend on the metal dispersion within the
studied range. Overall, the variation of metal dispersions
123