R. Ding et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 2995–2998
2997
Table 2 (continued)
Entry
Imine
PhMMe3
Product
Yielda
Me
Me
Me
(3j)
O
N
O
S
H
S
HN
13
14
2a
58
(1k)
(1k)
Ph
Ph
Ph
Me
O
O
N
S
S
H
HN
2c
76d
(3k)
Ph
PhCl-(o)
Ph
2a ¼ PhSnMe3, 2b ¼ PhPbMe3, 2c ¼ o-ClPhPbMe3.
a Isolated yields, 35 ꢀC, sonication for 1.5 h.
b Sonicated for 2 h.
c 45% yield of p-O2NPhCH(OH)Ph (4) was obtained.
d de ¼ 34%.
1–9). The latter was attributed to the activation of the
C@N bond by an electron-withdrawing tosyl group.
Phenyllead reagent exhibited the same reactivity as
phenyltin reagent (entries 2 vs 1 and 6 vs 5). It was found
that the use of arylimines with electron-donating group
in the phenyl ring (1f–g) gave products 3f–g in lower
yields (entries 8–9). An exception is the case of N-tosyl-
p-nitrobenzylideneimine 1h, from which only 30% yield
of the product 3h was obtained and, in addition, (p-
nitrophenyl)phenylmethanol (4) was detected (3h:4 ¼
1:1.5). The results suggested that addition reaction and
hydrolysis of imines competed in water. For most imines
used, the addition reaction surpassed the hydrolysis of
imine to give the desired products in good yields.
However, in the case of 1h, the hydrolysis of imine is
faster than the addition reaction. Subsequently, the
hydrolysis product p-nitrobenzaldehyde reacted with 2a
to afford 4. The p-toluenesulfinylimine (1k) exhibited a
relatively lower reactivity (58% yield) than p-toluene-
sulfonylimine (80% yield, entries 13 vs 1). However,
when a chiral imine, (+)-N-(S)-p-toluenesulfinylbenzyl-
ideneimine[(+)-1k], was allowed to react with o-chloro-
phenyltrimethyllead (2c) in water under sonication, a
mixture of two diastereomers of 3k was obtained in 76%
References and notes
1. (a) Li, C. J.; Chan, T. H. Organic Reactions in Aqueous
Media; John Wiley: New York, 1997; (b) Organic Synthe-
sis in Water; Grieco, P. A., Ed.; Blackie Academic and
Professional: London, 1998; (c) Lubineau, A.; Auge, J. In
Modern Solvent in Organic Synthesis; Knochel, P., Ed.;
Springer: Berlin, 1999.
2. (a) Li, C. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 533–538; (b) Huang,
T.; Venkatraman, S.; Meng, Y.; Nguyen, T. V.; Kort, D.;
Wang, D.; Ding, R.; Li, C. J. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73,
1315–1318.
3. Li, C. J.; Meng, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9538–
9539; Miyaua and co-workers reported the first rhodium-
catalyzed addition of phenylboronic acids to aldehyde in
aqueous conditions under inert atmosphere: Ueda,
M.; Miyaura, N. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4450–
4452.
4. (a) Huang, T.; Meng, Y.; Venkatraman, S.; Wang, D.; Li,
C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7451–7452; (b) Huang,
T.; Li, C. J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2037–2039; (c) Venkat-
raman, S.; Li, C. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 781–784;
(d) Venkatraman, S.; Meng, Y.; Li, C. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 4459–4462; (e) Huang, T.; Li, C. J. Chem.
Commun. 2001, 2348–2349; (f) Ding, R.; Chen, Y. J.;
Wang, D.; Li, C. J. Synlett 2001, 1470–1472; (g) Ding, R.;
Ge, C.-S.; Chen, Y. J.; Wang, D.; Li, C. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 7789–7791.
1
yield and 34% de as determined by H NMR of 3k.
5. Oi, S.; Taira, A.; Honma, Y.; Inoue, Y. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
97–99.
A typical experimental procedure is as follows: a mix-
ture of 1a (60 mg, 0.22 mmol), 2a (84 mg, 0.37 mmol)
and Rh2(COD)2Cl2 (6 mg, 0.012 mmol) in 3 mL of water
was sonicated in an ultrasound bath at 35 ꢀC for 1.5 h.
Then, 15 mL of ether was added. The organic phase was
separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with
ether (3 · 10 mL). The combined organic layer was dried
over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The
crude product was purified by a flash chromatography
on silica gel (eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate ¼
20:1) to give product 3a (59 mg, yield 80%).
6. For recent reviews on addition of organometallic reagents
to C@N bonds see: (a) Enders, D.; Reinhold, U. Tetra-
hedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 1895–1946; (b) Bloch, R.
Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1407–1438; (c) Kobayashi, S.;
Ishitani, H. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1069–1094; (d) Alvaro,
G.; Savoia, D. Synlett 2002, 651–673.
7. (a) Calderon, S. N.; Rothman, R. B.; Porreca, F.; Flippen-
Anderson, J. L.; McNutt, R. W.; Xu, H.; Smith, L. E.;
Bilsky, E. J.; Davis, P.; Rice, K. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37,
2125–2128; (b) Delorme, D.; Berthelette, C.; Lavoie, R.;
Roberts, E. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 3963–3966;
(c) Cottney, J.; Rankovic, Z.; Morphy, R. J. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 1323–1328; (d) Barn, D. R.; Bom, A.;
Cottney, J.; Caulfield, W. L.; Morphy, R. J. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 1329–1334; (e) Plobeck, N.; Delorme,
D.; Wei, Z. Y.; Yang, H.; Zhou, F.; Schwarz, P.; Gawell,
L.; Gagnon, H.; Pelcman, B.; Schmidt, R.; Yue, S. Y.;
Walpole, C.; Brown, W.; Zhou, E.; Labarre, M.; Payza,
K.; St-Onge, S.; Kamassah, A.; Morin, P.-E.; Projean, D.;
Acknowledgements
We thank the financial support for this study provided
by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(No. 20332030, 20232010) and The Chinese Academy of
Sciences.