ligands (diethyl phosphite and DMAP, 0.2 mol % each) at
room temperature in THF, using N-ethylpyrrolidinone (NEP)
as cosolvent (Scheme 1).
(EtO)2P(O)H (0.2 mol %) and DMAP (0.2 mol %) at 25 °C
to give the cross-coupling product 3a in 79% yield after 2 h
(entry 1, Table 1). Similarly, the reaction of 2a with ethyl
3-bromobenzoate (1b) furnished the expected product 3b in
91% yield (entry 2) within a 6 h reaction time. We have
noticed that electron-rich arylzinc reagents react especially
well with aryl bromides under our conditions. Thus, the
cross-coupling of ethyl 4-bromobenzoate (1c) with 2a
provided the biphenyl 3c in 87% yield within a 6 h reaction
time (entry 3). Aryl bromides, bearing a ketone function,
are compatible with the mild cross-coupling conditions, and
4-bromobenzophenone reacted smoothly with 2a leading to
the ketone 3d in 73% yield within a 3 h reaction time (entry
4). 4-Bromo-acetophenone (1h) reacted with 2b within 2.5
h affording the methyl ketone 3g in 77% yield (entry 8).
Electron-poor aryl chlorides are also suitable electrophiles
under the reaction conditions we are advocating. Thus, the
reaction of 2a with ethyl 4-chlorobenzoate gave the expected
product 3c within 48 h at 25 °C in 83% yield (entry 5).
Heterocyclic halides such as 3-bromopyridine (1f) reacted
with 2a within 2 h at 25 °C, leading to the pyridine 3e in
81% yield. Scaling up the reaction using 20 mmol (1f)
provided the cross-coupling product 3e in a comparable yield
of 82%. By using 3-chloropyridine, the same cross-coupling
reaction required 12 h and gave 3e in 68% yield (entry 6).
The presence of an electron-withdrawing group allowed
cross-coupling of 2-chloropyridine derivatives. Thus, the
reaction of methyl 6-chloronicotinate (1g) with 3-methoxy-
phenylzinc bromide (2b) furnished the pyridine 3f in 74%
yield after 24 h (entry 7). 3-Pyridylzinc bromide displayed
a reduced reactivity and reacted with 2-bromobenzophenone
only at 50 °C, giving the ketone 3h in 76% yield within a 3
h reaction time (entry 9). Various substituted arylzinc
reagents such as 2d or 2e reacted with 5-bromopyrimidine
(1f), leading to the products 3i (82%) and 3j (60%). In the
case of an electron-deficient arylzinc halide (2e) the reaction
had to be performed at 50 °C within a 24 h reaction time
(entries 10 and 11). Aryl nonaflates proved especially
convenient substrates for the cross-coupling reaction as they
were usually easier to purify and more reactive than the aryl
triflates.12 Thus, the reaction of the zinc reagent 2f with the
nonaflate 1k provided the quinoline 3k in 88% yield (entry
12). 2-Zincated N-methylpyrrole (2g) obtained from the
corresponding lithium reagent13 and ZnBr2 underwent a
smooth cross-coupling with 3-bromopyridine (1f) at 70 °C
leading to â-nicotyrine 3l in 62% yield (entry 13), a natural
product with insecticidal activity14 (Scheme 2).
Scheme 1. Ni-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reaction of Arylzinc
Derivatives with Aryl Halides and Sulfonates
In preliminary studies, we investigated the cross-coupling
reaction between 4-methoxyphenylzinc bromide and 4-bro-
motoluene and found that the reaction took place in the
presence of 0.05 mol % of NiCl2 at room temperature without
a ligand when N-methylpyrrolidinone was used as a cosolvent
(THF-NMP 5:2). Other polar solvents such as DMSO,
DMAC, DMPU or Et3N were not effective as cosolvents.
Having examined various N-substituted pyrrolidinones, we
observed that N-(2-methoxyethyl)- and especially N-eth-
ylpyrrolidinone (NEP) gave much better results than with
NMP (88% conversion in the presence of NEP within 6 h
against 44% for NMP). We have further optimized the
cosolvent ratio and found that 8:1 THF-NEP mixture gives
the best results. We next screened this reaction with a broad
number of ligands such as phosphines, diphosphines, phos-
phites and various N-heterocycles. Surprisingly, from all the
ligands checked, diethyl phosphite gave the highest reaction
rate and the minimum amount of the arylzinc homocoupling
product. Interestingly, triphenylphosphine, also enhanced the
coupling rate but did not inhibit the reaction even when
present at 25-fold higher levels than Ni catalyst. Ratios of
NiCl2-(EtO)2P(O)H greater than 4:1 led to slower reaction
rates and extensive homocoupling. Other dialkyl and diaryl
phosphites were much less efficient.
We have also observed that the addition of 4-(dimethyl-
amino)pyridine (DMAP)10 in equimolar ratio to the ligand
amount provides a further rate acceleration, whereas DMAP
itself as a ligand showed poor results. The optimized
conditions allowed us to perform a broad range of cross-
coupling reactions within 1-20 h at room temperature (Table
1). Thus, 4-methoxyphenylzinc bromide (2a, 1.2 equiv),
obtained from the corresponding arylmagnesium reagent11
by a transmetalation with ZnBr2, reacted with 3-bromo-1-
fluorobenzene (1a) in the presence of NiCl2 (0.05 mol %),
Other arylzinc bromides such as 2h or 2i having a
trifluoromethyl- or a 1,3-dioxolane group provided the
corresponding biphenyls 3m-o in 68-94% yields (entries
14-16). Finally, for the cross-coupling of triflate 1l, we
probed the effect of the nature of the halide in the arylzinc
component. Thus, the cross-coupling reaction after the
transmetalation of 1-naphthylmagnesium bromide with ZnCl2
(8) (a) Lipshutz, B. H.; Blomgren, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
5819. (b) Bo¨hm, V. P. W.; Weskamp, T.; Gsto¨ttmayr, C. W. K.; Herrmann,
W. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1602. (c) Quesnelle, C. A.;
Familoni, O. B.; Snieckus, V. Synlett 1994, 349. (d) Tucker, C. E.; de Vries,
J. G. Top. Catal. 2002, 19, 111. (e) Ackermann, L.; Born, R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2444-2447.
(9) For Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, using other organometal-
lics, see: (a) Han, J. W.; Tokunaga, N.; Hayashi, T. Synlett 2002, 871. (b)
Shirakawa, E.; Yamasaki, K.; Hiyama, T. Synthesis 1998, 1544. (c) Terao,
J.; Watanabe, H.; Ikumi, A.; Kuniyasu, H.; Kambe, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 4222. (d) Terao, J.; Nii, S.; Chowdhury, F. A.; Nakamura, A.;
Kambe, N. AdV. Synth. Cat. 2004, 346, 905. (e) Percec, V.; Bae, J.-Y.;
Hill, D. H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 6895-6903.
(11) Krasovskiy, A.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3333.
(12) Rottla¨nder, M.; Knochel, P. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 203.
(13) Brittain, J. M.; Jones, R. A.; Arques, J. S.; Saliente, T. A. Synth.
Commun. 1982, 12, 231.
(10) Steglich, W.; Hoefle, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 981.
(14) Mu¨ller, G. B.; Georgies, S. V. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 2476.
4872
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 22, 2005