Chemical Papers
2
0
.474 mmol). After the addition, the mixture was stirred
(–CH Cl), 52.34 (NCH ), 77.32 (d, J=22.7 Hz, –CHOP),
2
2
at − 78 °C for 1 h and for an additional 30 min at room
temperature. The reaction solution was cooled to − 78 °C
again, and a solution of chlorodiphenylphosphine for 1 or
chlorodicyclohexylphosphine for 2 (0.474 mmol) in CH Cl
123.05, 123.43 (–NCHCHN–), 138.67 (–(CH )NCHN–);
3
1 13
assignment was based on the H– C HETCOR, DEPT,
1
1
31
1
and H– H COSY spectra; P-{ H} NMR (162.0 MHz,
CDCl -d , ppm): δ 148.76 (s, OPCy ); IR, (KBr): υ 2923,
2
2
3
1
2
−1
(
10 ml) was added dropwise to the reaction medium. Stirring
2850 (aliphatic C–H), 1446 (P-Cy), 1059 (O-P) cm ;
was maintained for further 1 h at −78 °C. Then, the cooling
bath was removed and the mixture was stirred for another
C H N OCl P (407.36 g/mol): calcd. C 56.02, H 8.16, N
1
9
33
2
2
6.88; found C 55.83, H 8.01, N 6.70.
1
h at room temperature. Precipitated lithium chloride was
6
removed by ꢁltration under argon, and then, the volatiles
were evaporated in vacuo to leave viscous oily phosphinite
ligand 1 or 2. The experimental details were in given in a
reference by Aydemir et al. (2014).
Synthesis of [Ru((Ph PO)–C H N Cl)(η ‑p‑cymene)Cl ]Cl,
2 7 11 2 2
3
1
1
(3) Yield 0.154 g, 86.5%. M.p.: 110–112 °C P-{ H} NMR
(162.0 MHz, CDCl -d , ppm): δ 124.23 (s, Ru-OPPh ); IR,
3
1
2
(KBr): υ 3053 (aromatic C–H), 1435 (P-Ph), 1047 (O-P),
−
1
5
32 (Ru–P) cm ; C H N OCl PRu (701.46 g/mol):
29 35 2 4
General procedure for the synthesis of ruthenium
complexes (3 and 4) (Chiappe et al. 2012)
calcd. C 49.66, H 5.03, N 3.99; found C 49.34, H 4.96, N
1
3.89. H NMR (400.1 MHz, CDCl -d , ppm): δ 9.53 (s,
3
1
1
H, –(CH )NCHN–), 7.14–7.93 (m, 12H, P(C H ) +–
3
6
5 2
6
[
[
(
Ru(η -p-cymene)(µ-Cl)Cl] (0.12 mmol) and
NCHCHN–), 5.43 (br, 2H, aromatic protons of p-cymene),
5.23 (br, 2H, aromatic protons of p-cymene), 4.81 (br, 1H,
–CHOP), 4.61 (br, 1H, NCH , (a)), 4.48 (br, 1H, NCH ,
2
(Ph PO)–C H N Cl]Cl, 1 or [(Cy PO)–C H N Cl]Cl, 2
2
7
11
2
2
7
11
2
0.24 mmol) were dissolved in 25 ml of dry CH Cl under
2
2
2
2
argon atmosphere and stirred for 30 min at room tempera-
ture. The volume of the solvent was then reduced to 0.5 ml
before addition of petroleum ether (10 ml). The precipitated
product was ꢁltered and dried in vacuo yielding 3 or 4 as a
clear red solid.
(b)), 3.94 (s, 3H, NCH ), 3.42 (br, 2H, –CH Cl), 2.46 (m,
3
2
1H, CH of p-cymene), 1.83 (s, 3H, CH Ph of p-cymene),
3
3
13
0.99 (d, 6H, J=6.8 Hz, (CH ) CHPh of p-cymene);
C
3
2
NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl -d , ppm): δ 17.22 (CH Ph of
3
1
3
p-cymene), 22.16, 22.23 ((CH ) CHPh of p-cymene),
3
2
3
0.01 (CH of p-cymene), 37.36 (NCH ), 44.57 (CH Cl),
3
2
1
2
[
(
(Ph PO)C H N Cl]Cl (1) Yield 0.180 g, 96.3%. H NMR
50.92 (NCH ), 75.11 (d, J=22.9 Hz, –CHOP), 86.77 (d,
2
7
11
2
2
2
400.1 MHz, CDCl -d , ppm): δ: 10.14 (s, 1H, –(CH )
J
=5.0 Hz, aromatic carbons of p-cymene), 88.89 (d,
3
1
3
31P–13C
2
2
NCHN–), 7.13–7.78 (m, 12H, P(C H ) +–NCHCHN–),
J31P–13C =7.0 Hz, aromatic carbons of p-cymene), 89.35 (d,
6
5 2
4
1
–
.94 (m, 1H, NCH , (a)), 4.71 (br, 1H, –CHOH), 4.57 (m,
J
=4.0 Hz, aromatic carbons of p-cymene), 92.56
=6.0 Hz, aromatic carbons of p-cymene),
2
31P–13C
2
H, NCH , (b)), 3.91 (m, 1H, –CH Cl, (a)), 3.85 (m, 1H,
(d, J
2
2
31P–13C
1
3
CH Cl, (b)), 3.80 (s, 3H, NCH ); C NMR (100.6 MHz,
96.31, 111.15 (quaternary carbons of p-cymene), 122.60,
2
3
3
CDCl -d , ppm): δ 36.55 (NCH ), 45.14 (–CH Cl), 52.52
123.17 (–NCHCHN–), 128.34 (d,
J
=10.1 Hz,
3
1
3
2
31P–13C
2
4
(
NCH ), 78.45 (d, J=23.1 Hz, (–CHOP), 122.59, 122.90
m-P(C H ) )), 131.91 (d, J
=6.1 Hz, p-P(C H ) ),
2
6
5 2
31P–13C
6
5 2
3
2
(
–NCHCHN–), 129.53 (d, J
=10.1 Hz, m-P(C H ) ),
133.84 (d,
J
=12.6 Hz, o-P(C H ) ), 137.87 (d,
3
1P–13C
6
5 2
31P–13C
6
5 2
2
1
1
31.41 (p-P(C H ) ), 135.26 (d,
J
=19.6 Hz,
J
=52.3 Hz, i-P(C H ) ), 139.70 (–(CH )NCHN–);
6
5 2
31P–13C
31P–13C
6
5 2
3
1
1
13
o-P(C H ) )), 140.65 (d, J
=47.8 Hz, i-P(C H ) ),
assignment was based on the H– C HETCOR, DEPT, and
6
5 2
31P–13C
6
5 2
1
1
1
1
38.17 (–(CH )NCHN–); assignment was based on the H–
H– H COSY spectra.
3
1
3
1
1
31
1
C HETCOR, DEPT, and H– H COSY spectra; P-{ H}
NMR (162.0 MHz, CDCl -d , ppm): δ 118.46 (s, OPPh );
6
Synthesis of [Ru((Cy PO)–C H N Cl)(η ‑p‑cymene)Cl ]Cl,
3
1
2
2
7
11
2
2
3
1
1
IR, (KBr): υ 3053 (aromatic C–H), 1434 (P-Ph), 1060 (O-P)
(4) Yield 0.163 g, 93.1%. M.p.: 106–108 °C P-{ H}
−1
cm ; C H N OCl P (395.27 g/mol): calcd. C 57.74, H
NMR (162.0 MHz, CDCl -d , ppm): δ 154.25 (s, Ru-
1
9
21
2
2
3
1
5
.35, N 7.09; found C 57.48, H 5.15, N 6.96.
OPCy ); IR, (KBr): υ 2926, 2852 (aliphatic C–H), 1446
2
−1
(
P-Cy), 1057 (O-P), 528 (Ru–P)cm ; C H N OCl PRu
29 47 2 4
1
[
(
(Cy PO)–C H N Cl]Cl (2) Yield 0.183 g, 94.8%. H NMR
(713.56 g/mol): calcd. C 48.81, H 6.64, N 3.93; found C
2
7 11 2
1
400.1 MHz, CDCl -d , ppm): δ 10.48 (s, 1H, –(CH )
48.53, H 6.51, N 3.83. H NMR (400.1 MHz, CDCl -d ,
3
1
3
3
1
NCHN–), 7.64, 7.45 (2xs, 2H, –NCHCHN–), 4.84 (m,
ppm): δ 9.81 (s, 1H, –(CH )NCHN–), 7.66, 7.08 (2xs,
3
3
1
H, NCH , (a)), 4.53 (m, 1H, NCH , (b)), 4.16 (br, 1H, –
2H, –NCHCHN–), 5.64 (d, 2H, J = 3.8 Hz, aromatic
2
2
3
CHOP), 4.10 (s, 3H, NCH ), 3.83 (m, 1H, –CH Cl, (a)),
protons of p-cymene), 5.61 (d, 2H, J = 3.8 Hz, aromatic
3
2
3
.68 (m, 1H, –CH Cl, (b)), 1.00–1.95 (m, 22H, protons of
protons of p-cymene), 5.34–5.36 (m, 1H, –CHOP), 4.72
(m, 1H, NCH , (a)), 4.43 (m, 1H, NCH , (b)), 4.02 (s,
2
1
3
P(C H ) ; C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl -d ,ppm): δ 26.20,
6
11 2
3
1
2
2
2
6.27, 26.64, 26.85, 26.98, 27.21 (CH of P(C H ) ), 37.20
3H, NCH ), 3.83 (m, 1H, –CH Cl, (a)), 3.26 (m, 1H, –
2
6
11 2
3
2
1
(
d, J=15.1 Hz, CH of P(C H ) ), 36.77 (NCH ), 44.05
CH Cl, (b)), 2.81 (m, 1H, –CH of p-cymene), 2.12 (s, 3H,
6
11 2
3
2
1
3