Preparation of Monodispersed YSZ Nanocrystals
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 105, No. 20, 2001 4651
for 10 min. Our results indicate that an additional absorption
band observed in the zirconia spectrum is due to the quantum
confinement effect. Under certain preparing conditions, the
zirconia product can be identified as consisting of two distinct
types of particles, nonagglomerated and agglomerated. As a
result, the observed DRS spectrum is composed of two different
absorption bands. The heavily agglomerated particles have a
band gap similar to that of the bulk material, whereas the
nonagglomerated particles exhibit a quantum confinement effect
and the increase in the band gap energy.
Conclusion
In summary, fully crystalline yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ)
nanocrystals are prepared by a novel method. The agglomera-
tions of YSZ particles are inhibited, while crystallization occurs
on the surface and interface of SrCO3 nanoparticles. This method
is simple, inexpensive, and easy to scale-up. The YSZ nano-
crystals are monodispersed with an average particle size of 4.7
Figure 4. Plots of F(R) vs wavelength of (a) sample A; (b) sample B;
and (c) sample C. The inset show the DRS result.
2
nm and a high surface area of 165 m /g. The quantum
confinement effect is observed, and the band gap increases from
4
.13 eV for the heavily agglomerated YSZ sample to 5.44 eV
of the monodispersed YSZ nanoparticles with a particle size
4
.7 nm.
Acknowledgment. Prof. A. Gedanken thanks the BMBF,
Germany, for financial support through the Energy Program.
Dr. Chen, Dr. Zhu, and Dr. Pang thank the Kort 100 Scholarship
Foundation for supporting their postdoctoral fellowship. The
authors thank Antje V o¨ lkel for the assistance in analytical
ultracentrifuge (AUC) measurements. The authors also thank
Prof. Arlene Wilson-Gordon for editorial assistance.
References and Notes
(
1) PaiVerneker, V. R.; Petelin, A. N.; Crowne, F. J.; Nagle, D. C.
Phys. ReV. 1989, B40, 8555.
2) Orera, V. M.; Merino, R. I.; Chen, Y.; Cases, R.; Alonso, P. J.
(
Phys. ReV. 1990, B42, 9782.
(
41.
3) Kosacki, I.; Petrovsky, V.; erson, H. U. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 74,
3
(
(
(
4) Brus, L. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 4403.
5) Xie, Y. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82(3), 768.
6) Bourell, D. L.; Parimal; Kaysser, W. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1993,
7
6(3), 705.
7) Hu, M. Z.-C.; Hunt, R. D.; Payzant, E. A.; Hubbard, C. R. J. Am.
Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82(9), 2313.
8) Brune, A.; Lajavardi, M.; Fisler, D.; Wagner, J. B., Jr. Solid State
Ionics 1998, 106, 89.
9) Dell’Agli, G.; Mascolo, G. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 20, 139.
10) Yuan, F. L.; Chen, C. H.; Kelder, E. M.; Schoonman, J. Solid State
Ionics 1998, 109, 119.
11) Grabis, J.; Kuzjukevics, A.; Rasmane, D.; Mogensen, M.; Linderoth,
(
Figure 5. DRS result of (a) sample B; the sediment of sample B after
storage in water for (b) 0.2 h; (c) 0.2-1 h; (d) 1-24 h, (e) >24 h, (f)
sample A; and (g) the suspension particles of sample A after storage
for 10 min in water.
(
(
(
sample B are composed of the absorption bands both of the
nonagglomerated particles (similar to sample C) and agglomer-
ated particles (similar to sample A). The weakly agglomerated
particles can be separated from heavily agglomerated particles
by sonication in water. After storing for a certain period, the
larger agglomerated particles settle down first, and the upper
suspension solution mainly consists of smaller agglomerated
or nonagglomerated particles. The particle size decreases as the
storage time increases. The proportions of the sediment for
sample B are ca. 93, 4, 2, and 1 wt % for storage time of 0.2
h, 1 h, 24 h, and > 24 h, respectively. The sediment after storage
of 24 h is obtained by centrifuging. Figure 5 shows the DRS
result of sample A and B and the sediment of them after storage
in water for a certain time. We observe a blue shift of the
absorption band due to the confinement effect resulting from
the change of the particle size. Although sample A is hardly
agglomerated, there are also ca. 2 wt % of relatively smaller
particles separated after storage of the suspension of sample A
(
S. J. Mater. Sci. 1998, 33, 723.
(12) Hu, M. Z.-C.; Harris, M. T.; Byers, C. H. J. Colloid Interface Sci.
1
1
998, 198, 87.
13) Clearfield, A.; Serrette, G. P. D.; Khazi-Syed, A. H. Catalysis Today
(
994, 20, 295.
(14) Clearfield, A. Inorg. Chem. 1964, 3, 146.
(15) Clearfield, A. J. Mater. Res. 1990, 5, 161.
(
(
(
16) Stichert, W.; Schuth, F. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 2020.
17) Wu, N.-L.; Wang, S.-Y.; Rusakova, I. A. Science 1999, 285, 1375.
18) Mercera, P. D. L.; Vanommen, J. G.; Doesburg, E. B. M.;
Burggraaf, A. J.; Ross, J. R. H. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 4890.
(19) Sagel-Ransijn, C. D.; Winnubst, A. J. A.; Burggraaf, A. J.; Verweij,
H. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 16, 759.
(20) Jiang, S.; Stangle, G. C.; Amarakoon, V. R. W.; Schulze, W. A. J
Mater. Res. 1996, 11(9), 2318.
(21) Ramesh, S.; Minti, H.; Reisfeld, R.; Gedanken, A. Optical Materials
1
999, 13, 67.
22) Ramesh. S.; Cohen, Y.; Aurbach, D.; Gedanken, A. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1998, 287, 461.
23) Patra, A.; Sominska, E.; Ramesh, S.; Koltypin, Yu.; Zhong, Z.;
Minti, H.; Reisfeld, R.; Gedanken, A. J. Phys. Chem. B, 1999, 103, 3361.
(
(