CO2 Photoreduction in TS-1 Sieve
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 104, No. 33, 2000 7839
carbonyl).34,35 On the basis of enthalpies of formation
Sciences Division of the U.S. Department of Energy under
Contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098.
-
1 36
(
∆Hf°(CO2) ) -94.05 kcal mol
; ∆Hf°(CH3OH) ) -48.0
-1 36
-1 37
kcal mol
)
; ∆Hf°(CH2OH) ) -2 kcal mol
; ∆Hf°(HCO2)
-31 kcal mol- ; ∆Hf°(HOCO) ) -51 kcal mol
1 33
-1 33
), we
References and Notes
-
1
estimate an endothermicity of 109 kcal mol for the CO2 +
(
1) Hemminger, J. C.; Carr, R.; Somorjai, G. A. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1978, 57, 100.
2) Inoue, T.; Fujishima, A.; Konishi, S.; Honda, K. Nature 1979, 277,
-
1
CH3OH f HCO2 + CH2OH path, and 87 kcal mol for the
HOCO + CH2OH route. Hence, the formation of HOCO
intermediate is thermodynamically preferred, and is consistent
with the fact that the reaction can be initiated by 266 nm quanta
(
37.
6
(3) Halmann, M. M. Chemical Fixation of Carbon Dioxide; CRC
Press: Boca Raton, 1993; p 131.
-
1
(
107 kcal mol ). By contrast, the photolysis photon energy is
(4) Linsebigler, A. L.; Lu, G.; Yates, J. T., Jr. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95,
735.
-1
a few kcal mol short of generating formate radical. However,
the thermochemical data refer to the free species in the gas
phase. Interaction of the transient radicals with the Ti center
may lower these energies substantially. While we cannot be
more specific on the CHO2 intermediate, this work establishes
conclusively that single photon-induced 2-electron reduction of
CO2 at Ti centers in the silicate framework results in the
formation of a C-H bond, and not in abstraction of oxygen to
yield CO.
(
5) Mandler, D.; Willner, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 7884.
(6) Anpo, M.; Yamashita, H.; Ikene, K.; Fujii, Y.; Zhang, S. G.;
Ichihashi, Y.; Park, D. R.; Susuki, Y.; Koyano, K.; Tatsumi, T. Catal. Today
998, 44, 327, and references therein.
7) Zhang, S. G.; Fujii, Y.; Yamashita, H.; Koyano, K.; Tatsumi, T.;
1
(
Anpo, M. Chem. Lett. 1997, 659.
(8) Chiba, K.; Anpo, M. J. Mol. Catal. 1992, 74, 207.
(
9) Anpo, M.; Yamashita, H. In Surface Photochemistry; Anpo, M.,
Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, 1996; p 117.
10) Anpo, M.; Yamashita, H.; Ichihashi, Y.; Fujii, Y.; Honda, M. J.
Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 2632.
11) Kumar, R.; Bhaumik, A.; Ahedi, R. K.; Ganapathy, S. Nature 1996,
81, 298.
(
(
Anpo and co-workers have proposed a mechanism for CO2
photoreduction by H2O in Ti silicate sieves,6,7 based on
spectroscopic studies using highly dispersed Ti oxide anchored
3
(
12) Bhaumik, A.; Mukherjee, P.; Kumar, R. J. Catal. 1998, 178, 101.
(13) Treacy, M. M. J.; Higgins, J. B.; van Ballmoos, R. Zeolites 1996,
3
8,39
16, 524.
on porous glass, or by using powdered TiO2 catalyst.
ESR
(14) Trong On, D.; Kaliaguine, S.; Bonneviot, L. J. Catal. 1995, 157,
measurements at 77 K of CO2 photoreduction at these surfaces
indicate the formation of Ti3 ions, H atoms and OH radicals,
and C radicals. When conducting the photoreaction at 323 K,
CH3OH, CH4, and CO were detected as products. From these
results, it was proposed that CO2 reduction and H2O decomposi-
tion proceed competitively at the LMCT- excited Ti-O centers;
CO2 is reduced to CO, and subsequently to C radicals while
H2O photodecomposes to H and OH radicals. Reaction of H
and OH with the carbon species is thought to yield CH3OH
2
35.
+
(15) Vayssilov, G. N. Catal. ReV. 1997, 39, 209, and references therein.
(16) Geobaldo, F.; Bordiga, S.; Zecchina, A.; Giamello, E.; Leofanti,
G.; Petrini, G. Catal. Lett. 1992, 16, 109.
17) Van der Pol, A. J. H. P.; Verduyn, A. J.; van Hoof, J. H. C. Appl.
Catal. A 1992, 92, 113.
(18) Duprey, E.; Beaunier, P.; Springuel, M. A.; Bozon, F.; Fraissard,
J.; Manoli, J. M.; Bregeault, J. M. J. Catal. 1997, 165, 22.
(
(19) Lamberti, C.; Bordiga, S.; Arduino, D.; Zecchina, A.; Geobaldo,
F.; Spano, G.; Genoni, F.; Petrini, G.; Carati, A.; Villain, F.; Vlaic, G. J.
Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 6382.
6,38,39
(20) Ulagappan, N.; Frei, H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 490.
and CH4.
It is not known how many photons are consumed
(21) Spence, R.; Wild, W. J. Chem. Soc. (London) 1935, 338.
by these transformations. While the mechanism proposed by
Anpo cannot be compared directly with the CO2 photoreduction
reported here because of the use of different electron donors, it
is important to note that, according to our results, formic acid
photodissociates efficiently to CO and H2O under UV irradiation
of the Ti-O LMCT transition. Hence, formation of HCO2H
might escape detection under continuous UV photolysis condi-
tions.
(
22) Herzberg, G. Infrared and Raman Spectra; Van Nostrand: New
York, 1945; p 274.
(23) Jacox, M. E.; Milligan, D. E. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1974, 52, 363.
(
24) M u¨ ller, R. P.; Hollenstein, H.; Huber, J. R. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1983,
00, 95.
25) Colthup, N. B.; Daly, L. H.; Wiberley, S. E. Introduction to Infrared
and Raman Spectroscopy, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1990; p
17.
26) Plyler, E. K.; Danti, A.; Blaine, L. R.; Tidwell, E. D. J. Res. Natl.
Bur. Stand. 1960, 64, 29.
1
(
3
(
(
27) Redington, R. L. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1977, 65, 171.
(28) Herzberg, G. Infrared and Raman Spectra; Van Nostrand: New
Conclusions
York, 1945; p 300.
(29) Jacox, M. E. Chem. Phys. 1981, 59, 213.
(
30) March, J. AdVanced Organic Chemistry, 4th ed.; Wiley: New York,
In-situ FT-IR monitoring of the Ti-O LMCT-induced
photoreduction of gaseous CO2 in Ti silicalite sieve using
methanol as donor has revealed formic acid as the primary
1
5
992; p 1233.
(31) Hammerich, O.; Parker, V. D. AdV. Phys. Org. Chem. 1984, 20,
5.
(
32) (a) Radford, H. E. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1980, 71, 195. (b) Radford,
2-electron-transfer product. This establishes C-H bond forma-
H. E.; Evenson, K. M.; Jennings, D. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1981, 78, 589.
(33) Kim, E. H.; Bradforth, S. E.; Arnold, D. W.; Metz, R. B.; Newmark,
D. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 7801.
tion during the initial steps of CO2 photoreduction. While carbon
monoxide product is also observed, the growth kinetics indicate
that CO is formed by secondary photolysis of HCO2H. This
study constitutes the first insight into the initial steps of CO2
photoreduction in a framework Ti molecular sieve. The proposed
mechanism involves photoinduced one-electron transfer to
produce transient CHO2 radical. Time-resolved infrared spec-
troscopic studies on the nanosecond time-scale will be needed
(
(
(
34) Jacox, M. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 4598.
35) Milligan, D. E.; Jacox, M. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 927.
36) Benson, S. W. Thermochemical Kinetics; Wiley: New York, 1968.
(37) Tsang, W. In Energetics of Organic Free Radicals; Martinho-
Simoes, J. A., Greenberg, A., Liebman, J. F., Eds.; Blackie Academic and
Professional: London, 1996; p 22.
(38) Anpo, M.; Chiba, K. J. Mol. Catal. 1992, 74, 207.
(39) Anpo, M.; Yamashita, H.; Ichihashi, Y.; Ehara, S. J. Electroanal.
Chem. 1995, 396, 21.
40-42
to detect this crucial intermediate and elucidate its structure.
(40) Vasenkov, S.; Frei, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4031.
(41) Vasenkov, S.; Frei, H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 4327.
(42) Vasenkov, S.; Frei, H. In Molecular and Supramolecular Photo-
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Director,
Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical
chemistry; Ramamurthy, V., Schanze, K. S., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New
York, 2000; Vol. 5, p 299.