liposomes in an aqueous dispersion, R-tocopherol was not
consumed until aqueous-phase ascorbate was used up. In
of action. Here, we report on our attempts to introduce
alkyltelluro groups into the tocopherol scaffold and the
catalytic chain-breaking and hydroperoxide decomposing
activity of the products.
Alkyltelluro functionalization of phenols is com-
monly effected by a sequence of reactions involving ortho-
bromination, lithiumꢀhalogen exchange/deprotonation,
and reaction of the resulting dianion with a dialkyl dite-
6
vivo data in support of regeneration are scarce, though.
Biological hydroquinones, such as ubiquinole, have also
been shown to act as regenerating agents toward the
7
tocopheroxyl radical in vitro. This is also true for
8
phenothiazines, and certain phenolic compounds with
8
,9
sufficiently low OꢀH bond dissociation enthalpies.
1
3
0
0
During the past decade we have studied the antioxidative
properties of organochalcogen compounds. The most
notable advance was the recent finding that introduction
of an alkyltelluro group into the ortho-position of a
phenolic compound caused a dramatic increase in the
rate constant for quenching of peroxyl radicals. Thus,
lluride. Since (2R,4 R,8 R)-δ-tocopherol (4) is commer-
ciallyavailablein quantityata reasonable pricewethought
it would be a suitable starting material for such an ap-
proach. Work by Rosenau and co-workers has shown that
Br selectively causes a monobromination of δ-tocopherol
2
1
3
in position 5. We found that tetrabutylammonium tri-
bromide was a more convenient reagent for this transfor-
mation affording a 98% isolated yield of compound 5a
when the reaction was carried out in chloroform at room
temperature. However, after lithiumꢀhalogen exchange/
deprotonation effected by treatment with 3 equiv of t-BuLi
in dry THF at ꢀ78 °C, none of the expected (alkyltelluro)-
phenol 6b was formed upon addition of dioctyl ditelluride
as a source of electrophilic tellurium. Tetrahydropyran
(THP) protection of the phenol changed the situation
favorably (Scheme 2). Compound 5b (93% yield) on
treatment with 2 equiv of t-BuLi and then dioctyl ditellur-
ide returned the protected target molecule 6a (50% yield).
Stirring in dichloromethane containing 0.5 equiv of tri-
fluoroacetic acid released the desired tocopherol deri-
vative 6b (64% yield).
2
some 4 orders of magnitude more rapidly than phenol
-(octyltelluro)phenol quenched lipid peroxyl radicals
1
0
itself. This cannot be accounted for by weakening of the
1
1
OꢀH bond as a result of a substitutent effect but rather
suggests an unconventional mechanism involving the chal-
cogen. Both experiment and calculations were in support
of the suggestion that quenching of peroxyl radicals occurs
via initial oxygen transfer to tellurium, followed by hydro-
gen atom transfer in a solvent cage from the nearby phenol
1
2
to the resulting alkoxyl radical (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Proposed Catalytic Mechanism for Quenching of
Peroxyl Radicals by 2-(Alkyltelluro)phenols in the Presence of
Thiols
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Compound 6b
In the presence of a suitable thiol reducing agent RSH,
the alkyltelluro moiety could also facilitate regeneration of
1
0,12
β-Tocopherol (2) was also considered as a starting
material for alkyltelluro functionalization in the remaining
aromatic position. It is available from commercial suppli-
ers but prohibitively expensive for large-scale synthesis.
We found that the chemistry developed for obtaining 6b,
using methyl iodide instead of a ditelluride as an electro-
phile, produced THP-protected β-tocopherol (90% yield)
and after deprotection, β-tocopherol (86% yield), identical
in all respects with a sample obtained by aminoalkylation
the phenolic antioxidant
to allow for a catalytic mode
(
6) (a) Niki, E.; Kawakami, A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kamiya, Y. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1985, 58, 1971–1975. (b) Doba, T.; Burton, G. W.;
Ingold, K. U. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1985, 835, 298–303.
(7) (a) Frei, B.; Kim, M. C.; Ames, B. N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1990, 87, 4879–4883. (b) Mukai, K.; Itoh, S.; Morimoto, H. J. Biol.
Chem. 1992, 267, 22277–22281. (c) Shi, H.; Noguchi, N.; Niki, E. Free
Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 27, 334–346.
(
8) Amorati, R.; Ferroni, F.; Lucarini, M.; Pedulli, G. F.; Valgimigli,
L. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 9295–9303.
9) (a) Jia, Z.-S; Zhou, B.; Yang, L.; Wu, L.-M.; Liu, Z.-L. J. Chem.
(
14
of δ-tocopherol followed by borohydride reduction. By
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1998, 911–915. (b) Zhou, B.; Jia, Z.-S; Chen, Z.-H.;
Yang, L.; Wu, L.-M.; Liu, Z.-L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2000,
using the strategy shown in Scheme 2 as a blueprint,
β-tocopherol was brominated (83% yield of 7a) in posi-
tion 7 using tetrabutylammonium tribromide. However,
785–791. (c) Pedrielli, P.; Skibsted, L. H. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50,
7138–7144. (d) Amorati, R.; Ferroni, F.; Pedulli, G. F.; Valgimigli, L.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9654–9658.
10) Poon, J.; Singh, V. P.; Engman, L. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 6008–
015.
11) Amorati, R.; Pedulli, G. F.; Valgimigli, L.; Johansson, H.;
Engman, L. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2326–2329.
12) Amorati, R.; Valgimigli, L.; Din ꢀe r, P.; Bakhtiari, K.; Saeedi, M.;
(
6
(
(13) Patel, A.; B o€ hmdorfer, S.; Hofinger, A.; Netscher, T.; Rosenau,
T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 4873–4881.
(14) Netscher, T.; Mazzini, F.; Jestin, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007,
1176–1183.
(
Engman, L. Chem.;Eur. J. 2013, 19, 7510–7522.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 24, 2013
6275