J. Zhang et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure xxx (xxxx) xxx
3
were collected at 293 K using graphite-monochromated MoK
diation (
a
ra-
calculated: C: 19.68, H: 0.55, N: 53.55; found: C: 19.63, H: 0.85, N:
53.89.
l
¼ 0.71073 Å) using omega scans from a Bruker CCD area
detector diffractometer. Data collection and reduction were per-
formed and the unit cell was initially refined using Bruker SMART
software. The reflection data were also corrected for LP factors. The
structure was solved by direct methods and refined by a least-
0
0
2.5.3. N,N - dinitro-N,N -bis[5-(tetrazol)furazan-4-yl]
methylenediamine (11)
The synthesis of compound 11 is similar to compound 3, ac-
2
0
0
squares method on F using the Bruker SHELXTL program. In
cording to the literature [26]. N,N -Dinitro-N,N -bis [3-hydrazino
(imino)methyl-furazan-4-yl]methylenediamine (0.386 g, 1 mmol)
these structures, the value of the Flack parameter did not allow the
direction of the polar axis to be determined and Friedel reflections
were then merged for the final refinement. Details of the data
collection and refinement are given in Table S1.
ꢀ
was added into AcOH (5 ml), the reaction system was cooled to 5 C,
vigorously stirred at this temperature and treated with by dropwise
addition of NaNO
2
(0.152 g, 2.2 mmol), and then the reaction
ꢀ
mixture was stirred for 1 h at 10e15 C, acidified with conc. HCl to
pH 1, the solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was taken
up in 10 ml of ethanol, the precipitate that formed was filtered off
and recrystallized from ethanol twice. Yield 0.265 g (65%), light
grown solid, Dec 148.9 C. H NMR (DMSO‑d
CH2, 4.98 (s, 2H, NH); C NMR (DMSO‑d
2.4. Computational method
The gas phase heats of formation for all new neutral compounds
ꢀ
1
were obtained using isodesmic reactions. The geometric optimi-
zation and frequency analysis of the structures were calculated
using B3LYP function with 6-31 þ G** basis set. All of the optimized
structures were checked to be true local energy minima on the
potential energy surface without imaginary frequencies. Single-
point energies based on the optimized structures were calculated
at the MP2/6-311þþG** set. Atomization energies for the frame
molecules or ions were obtained by employing the G2 ab initio
method. The conversion of gas phase enthalpies to solid phase
values for the neutral compounds was done by subtracting the
empirical heat of sublimation obtained based on Trouton’s rule.
Detonation properties of new compounds were calculated by using
EXPLO5 program. More calculation details can be found in the
Electronic Supporting Information.
6
, ppm):
d
6.69 (s, 2H,
151.05, 148.93,
42.6,
1
3
6
, ppm):
d
1
5
145.86,
67.61;
N
NMR
(DMSO‑d
6
):
d
31.9, ꢁ33.7, ꢁ41.3, ꢁ75.8, ꢁ206.9 ppm. IR (KBr) ṽ: 3630, 3039, 2924,
ꢁ
1
2854, 1592, 1407, 1279, 1104, 1021, 996, 897, 751, 733, 647 cm
Elemental analysis (%) for C (408.05): calculated: C: 20.60,
H: 0.99, N: 54.90; found: C: 20.39, H: 0.85, N: 54.71.
.
7 4 16 6
H N O
0
0
2.5.4. N, N - dinitro-N, N -bis[5-(tetrazol) furazan-4-yl]
ethylenediamine (15)
The synthesis of compound 15 is similar to compound 11. It was
recrystallized from MeOH twice. Yield (63%), light grown solid, Dec
ꢀ
1
163.4 C. H NMR (DMSO‑d
6
, ppm):
NH); C NMR (d4-MeOH, ppm): 152.60, 150.43, 143.75, 51.78;
NMR (d4-MeOH):
41.8, 26.9, ꢁ32.9, ꢁ38.5, ꢁ77.2, ꢁ214.1 ppm. IR
(KBr) ṽ: 3636, 3318, 3037, 1625, 1576, 1455, 1348, 1280, 1195, 1044,
2
d6.74 (s, 4H, CH ), 4.74 (s, 2H,
1
3
15
d
N
d
2
2
.5. Synthesis
ꢁ1
1
8 6 16 6
028, 1000, 757, 545 cm . Elemental analysis (%) for C H N O
.5.1. 4-Hydrazinofurazan-3-carboxylic acid (5)
(422.07): calculated: C: 22.76, H: 1.43, N: 53.08; found: C: 22.63, H:
1.23, N: 53.01. CCDC number: 1567536.
The synthesis of compound 5 is similar to compound 2 [26]. 3-
nitro-4-(1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)furazan (5), (1.83 g, 10 mmol) was
ꢀ
dissolved in MeOH (20 ml), the mixture was heated to 40e45 C
3. Results and discussion
2 4 2
and treated with 80% N H $H O(1.02 ml, 21 mmol) at this tem-
perature, accompanying the reaction mixture becoming cloudy
from transparent solution, after the exothermic effect ended, the
mixture was stirred at 40e45 C for 1 h, cooled to room tempera-
3.1. Synthesis
ꢀ
According to the literature [26,28] and synthesis route depicted
in Fig. 2, 4-(1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)furazan-3-amine (1), a luminous
yellow solid, was synthesized with high yield and then treated with
80% hydrazine hydrate in methanol at 50 C for 30 min. Hence,
amidrazone of 4-aminofurazan-3-carboxylic acid (2) was obtained
as faint yellow solid with high yield. Thereafter compound 2 was
treated with AcOH again at 5 C, and NaNO
the reaction mixture at 10e15 C for 30min, 4-(Tetrazol-5-yl)fur-
azan-3-aminie (3) was obtained as white solid.
ture and the precipitate was filtered off and recrystallized from
1
H
2
O. Yield in 80%, light brown needles. For compound 5. H NMR
ꢀ
(
DMSO‑d
6
, ppm):
C NMR (DMSO‑d
335, 3155, 1664, 1564, 1603, 1464, 1320, 1288, 1192, 955, 853, 802,
d
7.23 (s,1H), 5.84 (s, 2H), 5.72 (s, 2H), 4.47 (s, 2H);
1
3
6
, ppm): 158.52, 140.18, 136.37. IR (KBr) ṽ: 3379,
d
3
6
ꢁ
1
ꢀ
51, 418 cm . Elemental analysis (%) for C
H
3 7
N
7
O (183): calculated:
2
was slowly added into
ꢀ
C 22.93; H 4.49; N 62.40; found: C 22.41; H 3.89; N 62.44. CCDC
number: 1567538.
Similarly, 3-nitro-4-(1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl) furazan (4) was pre-
pared via the method used to synthesize 7. Due to the reducibility of
hydrazine and the nitro group of 4 was replaced by hydrazine
group, and the oxadiazole ring reacted with hydrazine to change
into amidrazone, compound 5 was obtained instead of compound
6. Compound 5 can act as an energetic dication, which would have
potential applications in energetic salts. Although compound 5 had
been reported by Stepanov [27], its single crystal structure has not
been reported. Finally, the ring replaced compound 3-nitro-4-
(Tetrazol-5-yl) furazan (7) was finally synthesized via treating
2
.5.2. 3-Nitro-4-(tetrazol-5-yl) furazan (7)
4
-(Tetrazol-5-yl)furazan-3-aminie (3) (3) (0.765 g, 5 mmol) was
added into the oxidation mixture of H
phuric acid at 50e60 C, attention please, this step is exothermic
and the temperature stay 50e60 C not easily. After the exothermic
effect ended, the reaction mixture was stirred at this temperature
for 1 h, cooled to room temperature and treated with Н
5
was washed with saturated brines two times, dried with anhydrous
sodium sulphate evaporated in vacuum, the solid residue was
recrystallized from
2
O
2
and concentrated sul-
ꢀ
ꢀ
2
О (about
0 ml). The product was extracted with CH Cl , the organic extract
2
2
compound 3 with classic oxidation mixture of H
trated sulphuric acid at 50e55 C. Compounds 8, 9, 10 and 12, 13, 14
2
O
2
and concen-
ꢀ
М
еОН. Yield 0.76 g (83%), white round-shaped
ꢀ
1
13
0
crystals, Dec 215 C. H NMR (DMSO‑d
6
, ppm):
155.43, 147.78, 136.35. IR (KBr) ṽ: 3459,
357, 3122, 3029, 2939, 2840, 2777, 2725, 2629, 2575, 2483, 1699,
641, 1622, 1503, 1450, 1408, 1392, 1187,1086, 1034, 996, 982, 883,
d
10.08 (s, 1H);
C
were prepared as described in our previous work. N,N -dinitro-
0
NMR (DMSO‑d
6
, ppm):
d
N,N -bis [5-(tetrazol)furazan-4-yl] methylene diamine (11) and
0
0
3
1
N,N -
dinitro-N,N -bis
[5-(tetrazol)furazan-4-yl]
ethylene
diamine(15) were obtained as maple solid by successfully
employing the same method of synthesis as compound 3;
ꢁ
1
3 7 3
516, 481, 419 cm . Elemental analysis (%) for C HN O (144.08):
Please cite this article as: J. Zhang et al., The enhanced properties of energetic materials through ring replacement strategy, Journal of Molecular
Structure, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127358