ChemPhysChem
10.1002/cphc.201700180
ARTICLE
5
5
.02 (s, 2H), 6.20 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.816.83 (m 2H), 7.077.14 (m,
H), 7.167.21 (m, 5H), 7.267.32 (m, 3H). C NMR (CDCl , 100 MHz):
3
28.36, 38.07, 38.43, 53.44, 55.82, 67.35, 80.32, 127.11, 127.19, 128.65,
at 80 ºC of a 0.415 mg/mL solution of TFA·FF-OBzl in MQ-grade water
and used for X-ray diffraction analysis. The X-ray intensity data were
13
measured on
a D8 Venture system equipped with a multilayer
1
1
5
28.67, 128.70, 128.74, 128.79, 129.41, 129.49, 135.14, 135.61, 136.62,
monochromator and a Cu microfocus (λ = 1.54178 Å).
+
55.39, 170.85, 170.90. HRMS (ESI) C30
H
34
N
2
NaO
5
[M+Na] : calcd.
25.2360, found 525.2375.
The frames were integrated with the Bruker SAINT software package
using a narrow-frame algorithm. The integration of the data using an
orthorhombic unit cell yielded a total of 13671 reflections to a maximum θ
angle of 79.25° (0.78 Å resolution), of which 5037 were independent
For Boc deprotection, a solution of the corresponding Boc-protected
compound in dichloromethane was treated with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA-
H; 15 equiv.) and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature
for 1 h. After evaporation of the solvent, the residue was suspended in a
diethyl ether/n-hexane mixture and filtered at reduced pressure to
provide the corresponding TFA salt as a white solid in quantitative yield.
(average redundancy 2.714, completeness = 95.0%, Rint = 4.97%, Rsig
=
2
5.67%) and 4499 (89.32%) were greater than 2σ(F ). The final cell
constants of a = 5.8856(3) Å, b = 18.5677(9) Å, c = 23.0370(11) Å,
3
volume = 2517.5(2) Å , are based upon the refinement of the XYZ-
centroids of reflections above 2θ σ(I). Data were corrected for absorption
effects using the multi-scan method (SADABS). The calculated minimum
and maximum transmission coefficients (based on crystal size) are
TFA·FF-OBzl (4). According to the general Boc deprotection procedure,
TFA (2 mL) was added to a solution of 3 (2.0 mmol) in dichloromethane
0.6156 and 0.7461.
(20 mL) to provide the corresponding TFA salt
4 (Figure S6) in
quantitative yield.
The structure was solved and refined using the Bruker SHELXTL
Software Package, using the space group P2 , with Z = 4 for the
. The final anisotropic full-matrix least-squares
refinement on F with 335 variables converged at R1 = 4.26%, for the
observed data and wR2 = 14.04% for all data. The goodness-of-fit was
1.032. The largest peak in the final difference electron density synthesis
2
0
1 1 1
2 2
Mp: 290-292 ºC dec. [α] : 18.2 (c = 0.36, acetic acid). IR (KBr) : 3342,
D
725, 1695, 1662 cm–1. 1H NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz): 2.90 (dd, 1H, J =
4.2 Hz, J = 8.3 Hz), 3.02 (dd, 1H, J = 13.9 Hz, J = 8.1 Hz), 3.083.13 (m,
H), 4.054.13 (m, 1H), 4.634.69 (m, 1H), 5.065.14 (m, 2H), 7.227.38
m, 15H), 8.23 (bs, 2H), 9.15 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz). C NMR (DMSO, 100
MHz): 36.79, 36.99, 53.21, 54.03, 66.37, 111.85, 114.77, 117.68,
formula unit, C27
H
F N O
27 3 2 5
1
1
2
2
13
(
-
3
-
3
was 0.289 e /Å and the largest hole was -0.257 e /Å with an RMS
-
3
deviation of 0.059 e /Å . On the basis of the final model, the calculated
density was 1.363 g/cm and F(000), 1080 e .
1
20.60, 126.80, 127.19, 128.09, 128.20, 128.45, 128.54, 129.18, 129.59,
34.79, 135.60, 136.65, 158.05, 158.40, 158.75, 159.10, 168.43, 170.71.
3
-
1
+
HRMS (ESI) C25
H N
26 2
NaO
3
[M+Na] : calcd. 425.1836, found 425.1821.
Samples preparation. Peptide containing solutions (25 or 100 L) were
prepared from 5 mg/mL stocks using HFIP, DMF, DMSO or milli-Q water
as solvents. The peptide concentration was reduced by adding milli-Q
Acknowledgements
Authors thank supports from MINECO and FEDER (MAT2015-
3
water, MeOH or CHCl , as co-solvent, to a given stock solution. More
69367-R, MAT2015-69547-R and CTQ2013-40855-R) and
specifically, peptide concentrations of 4.8, 4.0, 2.0, 1.0, 0.3, 0.25 and 0.1
mg/mL were obtained using 24:1, 4:1, 4:6, 1:4, 3:47, 1:19 and 1:49
solvent:co-solvent ratios, respectively. On the other hand, the 50mM-
KCl(aq) solution was used as co-solvent to modify the ionic strength.
Finally, 10 or 20 L aliquots were placed on microscope coverslips and
kept at room temperature (25 ºC) or inside a cold chamber (4 ºC) until
dryness. All organic solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Fisher
Scientific and Scharlab.
Gobierno de Aragón - Fondo Social Europeo (research group
E40). Support for the research of C.A. was received through the
prize “ICREA Academia” for excellence in research funded by
the Generalitat de Catalunya.
Keywords: Fibers; Hydrophylic core; Nanoplates; Peptide
materials; Stacking interactions
Optical microscopy. Morphological observations were performed using
a Zeiss Axioskop 40 microscope. Micrographs were taken with a Zeiss
AxiosCam MRC5 digital camera.
[1]
[2]
M. Reches, E. Gazit, Science 2003, 300, 625-627.
P. Tamamis, L. Adler-Abramovich, M. Reches, K. Marshall, P. Sikorski,
L. Serpell, E. Gazit, G. Archontis, Biophys. J. 2009, 96, 5020-5029.
C. H. Görbitz, Chem. Commun. 2006, 2332-2334.
[
[
3]
4]
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SEM studies were performed in
a Focussed Ion Beam Zeiss Neon 40 scanning electron microscope
operating at 5 kV and equipped with an EDX spectroscopy system.
Samples were mounted on a double-side adhesive carbon disc and
sputter-coated with a thin layer of carbon to prevent sample charging
problems.
L. Adler-Abramovich, M. Reches, V. L. Sedman, S. Allen, S. J. B.
Tendler, E. Gazit, Langmuir 2006, 22, 1313-1320.
[
[
[
5]
6]
7]
M. Reches, E. Gazit, Phys. Biol. 2006, 3, S10-S19.
M. Reches, E. Gazit, Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 581-585.
E. Mayans, G. Ballano, J. Casanovas, A. Díaz, A. Pérez-Madrigal, F.
Estrany, J. Puiggalí, C. Cativiela, C. Alemán, Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21,
1
6895-16905.
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Topographic AFM images were
obtained using either a Dimension 3100 Nanoman AFM or a Multimode,
both from Veeco (NanoScope IV controller) under ambient conditions in
tapping mode. AFM measurements were performed on various parts of
the morphologies, which produced reproducible images similar to those
[
[
8]
9]
X. Yan, J. Li, H. Möhwald, Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2796-2801.
J. Raeburn, A. Zamith Cardoso, D. J. Adams, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013,
42, 5143-5156.
[
10] A. Mahler, M. Reches, M. Rechter, S. Cohen, E. Gazit, Adv. Mater.
2006, 18, 1365-1370.
2
displayed in this work. Scan window sizes ranged from 55 m to 8080
2
[11] N. Amdursky, R. Orbach, E. Gazit, D. Huppert, J. Phys. Chem. C 2009,
13, 19500-19505.
m .
1
[
12] V. Jayawarna, M. Ali, T. A. Jowitt, A. F. Miller, A. Saiani, J. E. Gough, R.
Crystallization and X-ray diffraction. Colorless prism-like crystals
0.010 mm 0.020 mm 0.100 mm) were obtained by slow evaporation
V. Ulijn, Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 611-614.
(
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.