Angewandte
Chemie
top phase was aqueous LiCl. The reaction mixture was stirred
overnight at room temperature and the top phase was decanted off.
CH2Cl2 (200 mL) was then added and the mixture was washed three
times with H2O (500 mL). The addition of CH2Cl2 led to an improved
separation of the phases. After removal of CH2Cl2 and addition of
activated carbon, the mixture was stirred for over 48 h at room
temperature. Filtration of the mixture through a normal frit followed
by Millipore filtration (pore size 0.22 mm) afforded a colorless liquid,
which was washed with water once more, dried at 50–608C under
vacuum for 48 h and filtered through a Millipore filter (pore size
0.22 mm). The product, [BMIM]BTA, was a clear colorless liquid; its
NMR data are in close agreement with those reported for an acetone
solution (see Supporting Information).[33] The water content of
[BMIM]BTA was determined by a Karl–Fischer titration by using a
Metrohm 756 KF coulometer and found to be 23 ppm.
[3]M. L. Tobe, J. Burgess,
Inorganic Reaction Mechanisms,
Longman, Essex, 1999, p. 46.
[4]R. Romeo, A. Grassi, L. M. Scolora, Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 4383.
[5]R. van Eldik, C. Dücker-Benfer, F. Thaler, Adv. Inorg. Chem.
2000, 49, 1.
[6]R. van Eldik, C. D. Hubbard in High Pressure Chemistry:
Synthetic, Mechanistic, and Supercritical Applications (Eds.: R.
van Eldik, F.-G. Klärner), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002,
chap. 1.
[7]A. Hofmann, D. Jaganyi, O. Q. Munro, G. Liehr, R. van Eldik,
Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 1688.
[8]A. Hofmann, L. Dahlenburg, R. van Eldik, Inorg. Chem. 2003,
42, 6528.
[9]a) T. Welton, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 21; T. Welton, Coord.
Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2459; b) J. Dupont, R. F. deSouza, P. A. Z.
Suarez, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3667; c) M. Freemantle, Chem.
Eng. News 2004, 82(45), 44; d) Ionic Liquids in Synthesis (Eds.:
P. Wasserscheid, T. Welton), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
[10]E. T. Silveira, A. P. Umpierre, L. M. Rossi, G. Machado, J.
Morias, G. V. Soares, I. J. R. Baumvol, S. R. Teixeira, P. F. P.
Fichtner, J. Dupont, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 3734.
[11]M. Volland, V. Seitz, M. Maase, M. Flores, R. Papp, K.
Massonne, V. Stegmann, K. Halbritter, R. Noe, M. Bartsch, W.
Siegel, M. Becker, O. Huttenloch (BASF AG), WO 062251,200,
2003.
[12]A. Skrzypczak, P. Neta, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2004, 36, 4.
[13]C. Chiappe, D. J. Pieraccini, Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6059.
[14]K. Swiderski, A. McLean, C. M. Gordon, D. H. Vaughan, Chem.
Commun. 2004, 590.
[15]C. Daguenet, P. J. Dyson, Organometallics 2004, 23, 6080.
[16]P. Illner, A. Zahl, R. Puchta, N. J. R. van Eikema Hommes, P.
Wasserscheid, R. van Eldik, J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690,
3567.
Instrumentation and measurements: [BMIM]BTA was dried and
degassed before use. Its polarity was determined by using the
solvatochromic Reichardtꢀs dye (see the Supporting Information).
The dimensionless normalized ENT values of the solvent were
calculated according to reference [34].
Carlo Erba Elemental Analysers 1106 and 1108, and Bruker
Avance DPX 300 and DRX 400 NMR spectrometers were used for
chemical analysis and compound characterization, respectively. The
UV/Vis spectra for the study of slow reactions were recorded on a
Varian Cary 1G spectrophotometer equipped with a cell holder and
thermostat. For the kinetic measurements on fast reactions an
Applied Photophysics SX 18MV stopped-flow instrument was used.
The wavelengths used are listed in the Supporting Information.
Kinetic experiments at elevated pressure (1 to 130 MPa) were
performed in a laboratory-made high-pressure stopped-flow instru-
ment[35] or a Shimadzu UV-2101-PC spectrophotometer equipped
with a high-pressure cell designed for the study of slow reactions.[36]
The temperature of the instruments was controlled within an accuracy
of Æ 0.1 K. TU and IÀ (as LiI) were used as entering nucleophiles.
Their high nucleophilicity prevents the back reaction. The starting
complex was dissolved in water and methanol that contained LiCl
(0.002m) to avoid its solvolysis. Trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (0.01m)
was added to avoid formation of hydroxo or alcoholate ions, which
could compete in the chloride displacement. In the case of iodide as
nucleophile and methanol and water as solvent, the ionic strength was
kept at 0.2m (LiClO4). The reactions were studied under pseudo-first-
order conditions by using at least a tenfold excess of the nucleophiles.
All listed rate constants represent an average value of at least five
kinetic runs for each experimental condition.
Calculations: Structures were fully optimized at B3LYP/
LANL2DZp[24–26] and characterized by calculation of vibrational
frequencies. Relative energies include corrections for zero-point
vibrational energy differences. Solvent effects were probed with
IPCM single-point energy calculations by using the default param-
eters, that is, water as solvent.[29] The Gaussian program was used.[37]
Supporting Information available: Yields, elemental analyses,
and 1H NMR data for synthesized compounds; plots showing the
concentration, temperature, and pressure dependence of the
observed rate constants for the reactions between complex 1 and
thiourea or iodide.
[17]S. J. PꢀPool, M. A. Klingshirn, R. D. Rogers, K. H. Shaughnessy,
J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 3522.
[18]M. D. Sliger, S. J. PꢀPool, R. K. Traylor, J. McNeill III, S. H.
Young, N. W. Hoffman, M. A. Klingshirn, R. D. Rogers, K. H.
Shaughnessy, J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, in press.
[19]D. J. Adams, P. J. Dyson, S. J. Tavener, Chemistry in Alternative
Reaction Media, Wiley, Chichester, 2004, p. 81.
[20]It has been pointed out that corrections made to second-order
rate constants to compensate for changes in solvent density are
incorrect as all kinetic parameters are defined in terms of
concentration units under ambient conditions, that is, the
conditions under which all solutions were prepared, see: S. D.
Hamann, W. J. le Noble, J. Chem. Educ. 1984, 61, 658.
[21]No corrections were made to compensate for the temperature
and pressure dependence of the solvent viscosity as the inves-
tigated bimolecular reaction is slow and far away from a
diffusion-controlled chemical process for which viscosity
dependence is to be expected. It has been demonstrated
elsewhere that slow bimolecular reactions in general do not
exhibit meaningful viscosity dependence, see: C. F. Weber, R.
van Eldik, J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6904.
[22]C. Reichardt,
Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic
Received: April 16, 2005
Revised: June 19, 2005
Published online: August 22, 2005
Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003, p. 163.
[23]C. S. Consorti, P. A. Z. Suarez, R. F. de Souza, R. A. Burrow,
D. H. Farrar, A. J. Lough, W. Loh, L. H. M. da Silva, J. Dupont,
J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 4341.
[24]a) P. J. Stevens, F. J. Devlin, C. F. Chablowski, M. J. Frisch, J.
Phys. Chem. 1994 98, 11623; b) A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys.
1993, 98, 5648; c) C. Lee, W. Yang, R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 1988,
37, 785.
Keywords: density functional calculations · ionic liquids ·
.
kinetics · platinum · reaction mechanisms
[25]P. J. Hay, W. R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 270, 284, 299.
[1]B. Lippert, Cisplatin. Chemistry and Biochemistry of a Leading
[26]S. Huzinaga,
Gaussian Basis Sets for Molecular Calculations,
Anticancer Drug, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999.
[2]U. Fekl, K. I. Goldberg, Adv. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 54, 260.
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6033 –6038
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim