R. D. Bowen et al.
In addition to the 15 skeletal vibrations expected for the C5OC
backbone, modes with CH2 and CH3 bending motion should occur
in this region. Both deformations [δ(CH2), δ(CCH), and δ(CH3)] and
rocking or wagging [ρ(CH2) and ρ(CH3)] modes are observed.
The band corresponding to the δ(OCH) mode generally cannot
be identified with confidence in most Raman spectra: it is usually
the spectra of both PMOCD3 and PM5D3, it cannot be associated
with the vibration of a methyl group. Therefore, it is better to
ascribe this band to a ρ(CH2) vibration, which fits the evidence
better than an alternative tentative assignment to a ν(CC) mode.
Similarly, the data in Table 1 clearly establish that the assignment
of the band observed at 883/891 cm in the Raman spectra of
biological specimens to a ρ(CH2) rocking mode is incorrect. It is
better to associate it with a ν(CCC) or ν(CCO) mode.
−
1
−
1
a medium intensity feature in the 1420–1300 cm region, in
which the stronger δ(CH2) and δ(CH3) bands are found. In the
−
1
PME series, however, a band in the 1280–1238 cm range can be
unambiguouslyassignedtothismode;theCHbandsthatnormally
obscureitcanbedifferentiatedfromitbyconsideringtheinfluence
of deuteriation on their wavenumber. This band appears at similar
On the other hand, the spectra of the deuteriated ethers
sometimes confirm previous tentative assignments. A band at
−
1
[1]
1450 cm in the spectrum of keratotic tissue had previously
[
12]
been attributed on the basis of literature precedent to a δ(CH2)
−
1
wavenumber to the band at 1274 cm assigned to the analogous
scissors mode. This assignment is correct because a band appears
[
10]
−1
δ(OCH) mode in the spectrum of n-propanol.
between 1446 and 1453 cm in the spectra of all the ethers
There is little observed difference between the wavenumbers
of the bands ascribed to skeletal C–C and C–O stretching modes
in the Raman spectra of PME and unbranched alkanes. This result
is, perhaps, hardly surprising: the masses of carbon and oxygen
atoms do not differ greatly; moreover, a strong coupling between
thesetwomodeswouldbeexpected.Ontheotherhand,variations
studied in this work. Similarly, the presence of a band in the
−
1
spectra of the PMEs in the 1302–1292 cm
range indicates
that the assignment[ of a band at 1290 cm in the spectra of
3]
−1
biological tissues to a δ(CH2) mode is accurate.
in the intensity of the bands in this region of the corresponding Conclusions
Raman spectra are more significant, not least because of the
This study of labelled PMEs permits useful corrections and
marked difference in polarity of the C–O and C–C bonds.
The δ(CH2) and δ(CH3) modes expected in the 1300–1470 cm
−
1
refinementstobemadeintheassignmentofnumerousubiquitous
features of the Raman spectra of simple aliphatic compounds. The
closer association of specific structural features with particular
bands is of obvious value in enhancing the analytical value
of Raman spectroscopy in a variety of biological and forensic
contexts.
range should be converted by deuteriation to δ(CD2) and δ(CD3)
−
1
features at lower wavenumber (960–1080 cm ). Unfortunately,
however, these CD deformation modes occur at similar wavenum-
ber to the ρ(CH2) and ρ(CH3) vibrations, thus further complicating
the assignment. The analogous ρ(CD2) and ρ(CD3) modes should
−
1
appear at even lower wavenumber (640–680 cm ). Nevertheless,
the CD2 and CD3 deformation modes may be assigned by careful
comparison of the spectra of the deuteriated PMEs.
Acknowledgements
The award of research grants from the Royal Society of Chemistry
and the British Mass Spectrometry Society for the purchase of
isotopically labelled starting materials to permit the synthesis
of deuteriated alkenyl methyl ethers and related compounds is
gratefully acknowledged.
In this low wavenumber region, the skeletal modes are best
described as combinations of vibrations of groups of three ‘heavy’
atoms, especially δ(CCC) and δ(CCO). Consequently, the details
of modes listed in Table 1 are again affected by mode mixing.
Notwithstanding this limitation, several interesting features may
be identified including a δCH deformation band that cannot be
associatedsimplywiththeatomsofparticularmethylormethylene
−
1
References
group. This medium to strong band is present at 1302 ± 2 cm
in the spectra of PME; PMOCD3, PM1D2, PM2D2, and PM5D3;
consequently, it does not arise by vibrations involving atoms of
either methyl group or the methylene groups containing carbons
[
1] D. A. Long,TheRamanEffect, JohnWileyandSons:Chichester, 2002.
[2] P. J. Hendra, C. Jones, G. Warnes, Fourier Transform Raman
Spectroscopy, Ellis Harwood: Chichester, 1991.
[
3] D. B. Chase, J. F. Rabolt,FourierTransformRamanSpectroscopy:From
1
or 2. The absence of a comparable band in the spectrum of
Concept to Experiment, Academic Press: San Diego, CA, New York,
PM3D2 appears at first sight to indicate that it is produced by
a δ(CH2) vibration of the atoms in the third methylene group.
However, such an interpretation is inconsistent with the presence
1
994.
[4] A. C. Williams, H. G. M. Edwards, B. W. Barry, J. Raman Spectrosc.
1994, 95, 25.
[5] R. D. Bowen, H. G. M. Edwards, D. W. Farwell, J. Mol. Struct. 1995,
−
1
of a broad band at 1292 cm in the spectrum of PM4D2. The
change in appearance of the band, together with the shift to
lower wavenumber induced by deuteriation at C4, suggests that
it is better to ascribe it to a vibration involving the atoms of the
two adjacent methylene groups containing C3 and C4. This mode
entails more movement of atoms in the former entity, but those
of the neighbouring C4 methylene group also participate to some
extent. The detection of such complex vibrations suggests that
the localized vibration approximation, which is so useful in Raman
and IR spectroscopy, may no longer apply precisely for alkyl chains
with closely similar methylene groups.
351, 77.
[
6] (a) R. D. Bowen,
H. G. M. Edwards,
D. W. Farwell,
I. Rusike,
D. M. Saunders, J. Chem. Res., Synop. 1998, 426; (b) R. D. Bowen,
H. G. M. Edwards, D. W. Farwell, I. Rusike, D. M. Saunders, J. Chem.
Res., Miniprint 1998, 1901.
[
[
7] R. D. Bowen, D. Suh, J. K. Terlouw, Org. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 29,
791.
8] S. Searles, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 124.
[9] R. D. Bowen, D. Suh, J. K. Terlouw, J. Chem. Soc., PerkinTrans. 2 1995,
119.
[
[
10] H. G. M. Edwards, D. W. Farwell, R. D. Bowen, J. Mol. Struct. 2007,
832, 184.
11] D. Lin-Vien,N. B. Colthup,W. G. Fateley,J. G. Grasselli,TheHandbook
or Infrared and Raman Characteristic Frequencies of Organic
Molecules, Academic Press: San Diego, CA, London, 1991.
Other refinements of earlier assignments in the spectra of
−
1
related compounds include the band observed at 961–953 cm
[12] M. Veronelli, G. Zerbi, R. Stradi, J. Raman Spectrosc. 1995, 26, 683.
in the spectra of various PMEs. This band had previously been
attributed a ρ(CH3) terminal methyl mode. Since it is present in
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jrs
Copyright ꢀc 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Raman Spectrosc. 2010, 41, 1725–1734