Inorganic Chemistry
Article
1% yield (8.7 mg, 1.3 × 10− mol). MW = 670.3 g/mol; R = 0.67
5
Cryosystems low-temperature device. Examination and data collection
were performed with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) at 150 K. Data
were collected, reflections were indexed and processed, and the files
were scaled and corrected for absorption using APEX3 and SADABS
or TWINABS. The space groups were assigned and the structures
were solved by direct methods using XPREP within the SHELXTL
7
(
(
f
1
silica-CH Cl ). H NMR (500 MHz; CDCl ): δ 9.65 (s, 2H), 8.94
2
2
3
s, 2H), 3.87−3.79 (m, 8H), 2.72 (qd, J = 13.4, 7.3 Hz, 8H), 1.80 (dt,
J = 15.3, 7.6 Hz, 12H), 0.47 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 12H). UV−vis (CH Cl )
2
2
λ
max
(log ε): 366 (3.79), 402 (4.15), 668 (4.16) nm. HR-MS (ESI+,
1
00% CH CN, TOF): m/z calc’d for C H N O Pd, 670.2499 (for
3 36 44 4 2
+
2
M ); found, 670.2517.
Octaethyl-7-hydroxychlorin (5). 7-Oxochlorin 4 (50 mg, 9.07 ×
suite of programs and refined by full matrix least-squares against F
−
5
10
mol) was dissolved in dry THF (2 mL). To this, a suspension of
−
4
LiAlH (10 mg, 2.7 × 10 mol, 3 equiv) in THF (1.5 mL) was added
4
at 0 °C under N and stirred for 5 min. The reaction mixture was
All four structures are isomorphic with close to identical molecular
conformations, unit cell shapes, and symmetry and packing
interactions. The structures are pseudo-B centered with a pseudo-
translation along the a−c diagonal. Exact translational symmetry is
2
quenched by slurrying with Glauber’s salt (Na SO ·10H O, about 1.5
2
4
2
g) and the resulting mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite, and
the pad was washed with CH Cl . The combined filtrates were
2
2
reduced by rotatory evaporation. The crude solid was dissolved in a
broken by a slight modulation of the two gem-C(Et) units, preventing
2
minimum amount of CH Cl and purified by column chromatography
an exact fit of a larger volume C-centered monoclinic structure. The b
and c axes in the four structures are close in length, and the order of
the two axes is swapped between the structures, thus resulting in
different standard settings for the four isomorphic structures. Each of
the two structures have the same standard setting: 2Ag and 2Cu, and
2Pd and 2Ni. The latter two were also found to be twinned by
2
2
(
silica, 100% CH Cl , followed by 2% acetone in CH Cl ) to provide
2
2
2
2
−
5
the product in 91% yield (46 mg, 8.32 × 10 mol). Data for the
known compound are included for comparison. MW = 552.8 g/mol;
R = 0.19 (silica-CH Cl ). H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ): δ 9.78 (d, J
1
f
2
2
3
=
3.3 Hz, 2H), 9.20 (s, 1H), 8.79 (s, 1H), 6.53 (s, 1H), 4.07−3.87
(
m, 12H), 2.71 (s, 1H), 2.61−2.51 (m, 3H), 2.35−2.25 (m, 1H),
1
.89−1.79 (m, 18H), 0.97 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.74 (t, J = 7.2 Hz,
H), 2.55 (s, 2H). UV−vis (CH Cl ) λ (log ε): 390 (5.02), 493
3
If not specified otherwise, H atoms attached to carbon atoms were
positioned geometrically and constrained to ride on their parent
atoms with carbon hydrogen bond distances of 0.95 Å for aromatic
CH, and 0.99 and 0.98 Å for aliphatic CH and CH moieties,
2
2
max
(3.85), 521 (3.25), 588 (3.31), 611 (3.26), 642 (4.38). HR-MS (ESI
+
, 100% CH CN, TOF): m/z calc’d for C H N O, 553.3901 (for
3 36 48 4
+
MH ); found, 553.3936.
Octaethyl-7-hydroxy-17-oxobacteriochlorin (6). A solution of
octaethyl-7,17-dioxobacteriochlorin 2 (50 mg, 8.82 × 10 mol) in
THF (3 mL) was stirred under N on an ice bath. NaBH (17 mg, 4.4
2
3
respectively. Methyl H atoms were allowed to rotate but not to tip to
−5
best fit the experimental electron density. U (H) values were set to a
iso
multiple of U (C) with 1.5 for CH , and 1.2 for CH units,
2
4
eq
3
2
−
5
×
10 mol, 5 equiv) was added (at 0 °C) and the reaction mixture
respectively.
was stirred for 24 h at ambient temperature. Then CH Cl (20 mL)
1955057 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this
2
2
was added and the mixture was washed with a sat’d aq solution of
NH Cl. The organic layer was separated, dried over anhydrous
4
Na SO , and filtered. The filtrate was reduced to dryness using
2
4
rotatory evaporation. The residue was purified by silica-gel column
chromatography (silica, CH Cl ) to yield 6 in 78% (39 mg, 6.86 ×
2
2
−
5
1
1
0
mol) yield. MW = 568.8 g/mol; R = 0.33 (silica-CH Cl ). H
Kinetic Comparison. A series of parallel reactions were
conducted for porphyrin 4, oxochlorin 3, and dioxobacteriochlorin
f
2
2
NMR (400 MHz; CDCl ): 9.60 (s, 1H), 9.05 (s, 1H), 8.82 (s, 1H),
3
−
6
.67 (s, 1H), 6.40 (s, 1H), 3.95−3.84 (m, 8H), 2.64 (q, J = 7.3 Hz,
H), 2.57−2.44 (m, 3H), 2.26 (dt, J = 14.8, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 1.81−1.73
2 to compare their relative metal-insertion reaction rates: 8.86 × 10
mol of 2 (5.0 mg), 3 (4.9 mg), and 4 (4.7 mg), as well as 5.0 equiv.
Zn(OAc) ·2H O (4.41 × 10 mol, 9.7 mg) and Li CO (15.0 mg)
2 2 2 3
−
5
1
1.4, 7.4 Hz, 6H), −2.10 (s, 1H), −2.22 (s, 1H). UV−vis (CH Cl )
were combined in 25 mL three-necked round-bottom flasks equipped
with a reflux condenser and stir bar. These three flasks were then all
secured in the same oil bath. DMF (10 mL) was added
simultaneously to all and the mixtures were set stirring and heated
to reflux. Once refluxing, aliquots of ∼10 μL were periodically
withdrawn and added to a small vial preloaded with 1.0 mL of HPLC-
grade CH Cl . The frequency of withdrawal was chosen such that 10
2
2
λ
max
(log ε): 392 (4.84), 414 (4.91), 497 (3.83), 532 (3.10), 632
(
3.59), 660 (3.70), 693 (4.65). HR-MS (ESI+, 100% CH CN, TOF):
3
+
m/z calc’d for C H N O , 568.3777 (for M ); found, 568.3747.
36
48
4
2
7
,17-Dihydroxybacteriochlorin (7). Prepared in 48% yield (24
−
5
mg, 4.2 × 10 mol) from octaethyl-7,17-dioxobacteriochlorin 2 (50
mg, 8.82 × 10− mol) and LiAlH (17 mg, 4.4 × 10 mol, 5 equiv) as
5
−5
4
2
2
described for the preparation of 7-hydroxychlorin 5. MW = 570.8 g/
mol; R = 0.29 (silica-CH Cl ). H NMR (400 MHz; DMSO-d ):
samples were interspersed throughout the total reaction time. The
vials were then capped, inverted to mix, and placed on dry ice until all
of the samples were collected.
1
f
2
2
6
9
.00 (s, 2H), 8.62 (s, 2H), 6.41 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 6.27 (d, J = 5.5
Hz, 2H), 3.87−3.76 (m, 8H), 2.44−2.38 (m, 6H), 2.09 (dt, J = 16.5,
.3 Hz, 2H), 1.73−1.65 (m, 12H), 0.90 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 6H), 0.54 (t, J
6.0 Hz, 6H), −2.54 (s, 2H). UV−vis (CH Cl ) λ (log ε): 350
Once the reaction was complete, the samples were diluted to 3.0
mL with CH Cl and a UV−vis spectrum of this solution was
6
2
2
=
recorded. Then, each solution was spiked three times successively
with a small (4−10 μL) recorded volume of conc. solutions (∼0.8
mM) of pure starting material, collecting a full UV−vis spectrum
between each. Using the same solution, the same procedure was
carried out using a concentrated solution of pure product, for a total
of seven collected spectra per sample.
2
2
max
(4.72), 375 (4.79), 464 (3.56), 496 (3.96), 713 (4.42). HR-MS (ESI
+
, 100% CH CN, TOF): m/z calc’d for C H N O , 570.3934 (for
3
36 50
4
2
+
M ); found, 570.3893.
Crystallography. Crystals were grown of 2Ni, 2Cu, 2Pd, and 2Ag
by slow vapor diffusion of hexanes into a concentrated solution of the
species dissolved in CH Cl . Single crystal data for 2Pd were collected
Data analysis consisted of constructing two successive-standard-
addition plots, one for the starting material and one for the product.
Single wavelengths were selected, one corresponding to either species.
2
2
on a Bruker Quest diffractometer with a fixed χ-angle, a sealed tube
fine focus X-ray tube, single crystal curved graphite incident beam
monochromator, a Photon100 CMOS area detector and an Oxford
Cryosystems low temperature device. Examination and data collection
were performed with Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 150 K.
Single crystal data for 2Ag, 2Ni, and 2Cu were collected on a Bruker
Quest diffractometer with κ-geometry, an I-μ-S microsource X-ray
tube, laterally graded multilayer (Goebel) mirror single crystal for
monochromatization, a Photon2 CMOS area detector and an Oxford
2
The generated plots were checked to ensure a linear response (r
value of greater than 0.998). In this plot, the x-intercept is taken to be
the absolute value of the concentration of the analyte in the original
solution. In this manner, the concentration of both materials was
determined in the sample. This value was tracked back through the
dilution procedure in order to determine the concentration of each in
the reaction mixture at the time of withdrawal.
H
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX