Dalton Transactions
Paper
higher reactivity of complexes 1 and 2 is most probably due to ing activity and the relative extent of the catalytic activity has
ease of the regeneration of the catalyst by molecular oxygen. been examined. Although electrochemical behaviors of all the
Moreover, the high reactivity of 1 in comparison to 2 probably complexes are very similar, their relative catalytic activity
due to the steric hindrance of the two methyl substitution at mimicking the function of phenoxazinone synthase arises
azomethine-C towards the incoming substrate as well as from the electronic and steric factors of the methyl substi-
during the regeneration of catalyst by the reaction of molecular tution specifically at the position of the substitution.
dioxygen. Effect of the methyl substitution has already been
noticed in the crystal structure of 2 where the metal⋯metal
separation as well as Co–O bond distances is slightly longer
than that found in 1. Although electrochemical behaviors of
all the complexes are very similar but the lower reactivity of
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to the University Grants Commission,
3
–5 can be explained by the chemical sense where the methyl
India for the financial support of this research (Sanction no.
PSW-173/11-12). Jadavpur University and Indian Association
for the Cultivation of Science, India, are also gratefully
acknowledged for the instrumental facilities.
substitution at sixth position of pyridine moieties decreases
significantly the possibility of oxidation by molecular dioxygen
chemically. The lowest kcat value of 3 possibly due to the struc-
tural rigidity of the ligand although significant flexibility is
gained by the addition of methanol molecule across one of the
–CvN– linker. Moreover, the slightly higher reactivity of com-
pound 5 in comparison to 4 can only be possible if the elec-
tronic features dominate over the steric factor that gained in
the presence of an additional methyl group attached to central
amine nitrogen in 5. Although not conclusive, the solid state
structure of complex 5 is quite informative as it shows the
methyl substitution under consideration occupying at the
opposition site of the approaching substrate molecule. It is
also worth noting that the present compounds especially 1
and 2 show even higher reactivity than our recently reported
References
1 E. I. Solomon, T. C. Brunold, M. I. Davis, J. N. Kemsley,
S. K. Lee, N. Lehnert, F. Neese, A. J. Skulan, Y. S. Yang and
J. Zhou, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 235.
2 E. I. Solomon, R. Sarangi, J. S. Woertink, A. J. Augustine,
J. Yoon and S. Ghosh, Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, 40, 581.
3 E. G. Kovaleva and J. D. Lipscomb, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2008,
4, 186.
4 C. E. Barry, P. G. Nayar and T. P. Begley, Biochemistry, 1989,
28, 6323.
5 A. W. Smith, A. Camara-Artigas, M. Wang, J. P. Allen and
W. A. Francisco, Biochemistry, 2006, 45, 4378.
2
4
bis(imido)-bridged dicobalt(III) complex. Such higher reactiv-
ity may be due to ease of molecular dioxygen activation in the
present cases.
6
C. E. Barry, P. G. Nayar and T. P. Begley, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
988, 110, 3333.
E. Frei, Cancer Chemother. Rep., 1974, 58, 49.
1
Conclusions
7
The present study demonstrates the syntheses and structural
characterizations of two peroxo-bridged cobalt(III) complexes (1
and 2) and three mononuclear cobalt(II) complexes (3–5)
8 U. Hollstein, Chem. Rev., 1974, 74, 625.
9 L. I. Simándi, T. M. Simándi, Z. May and G. Bensenyei,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 2003, 245, 85.
derived from the condensation products of triamine and 10 M. Hassanein, M. Abdo, S. Gergesand and S. El-Khalafy,
-acetylpyridine or 2-pyridinecarboxaldehyde (6-methyl-2-pyridi- J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2008, 287, 53.
necarboxaldehyde). Literature survey reveals that Mn, Fe, Ni, 11 R. Bakshi, R. Kumar and P. Mathur, Catal. Commun., 2012,
2
Cu and Zn stabilize either of the isomeric forms (Schiff dibasic
17, 140.
1
8–20
and heterocyclic) of the ligands,
but from the present 12 C. Mukherjee, T. Weyhermuller, E. Bothe, E. Rentschler
structural study it is clear that all the ligands exclusively bind
the metal centers through Schiff dibasic form independent on 13 T. M. Simándi, L. I. Simándi, M. Győr, A. Rockenbauer and
the oxidation state of cobalt. Furthermore, the effect of methyl Á. Gömöry, Dalton Trans., 2004, 1056.
substitution (even also the position of substitution) on their 14 T. Horváth, J. Kaizer and G. Speier, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.,
crystal structures is noticed. Methyl substitution on azo- 2004, 215, 9.
methine-C does not inhibit the peroxo-bridging although 15 J. Kaizer, G. Baráth, R. Csonka, G. Speier, L. Korecz,
and P. Chaudhuri, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46, 9895.
increased steric congestion around the metal center prevents
the close approach of metal centers to each other during the
A. Rockenbauer and L. Párkányi, J. Inorg. Biochem., 2008,
102, 773.
dioxygen activation as evidenced from the longer metal–metal 16 C. Mukherjee, T. Weyhermüller, E. Bothe and
separation found in 2 than that of 1. But the discrete effect has P. Chaudhuri, C. R. Chim., 2007, 10, 313.
been observed (for 3–5) when substitution is present at sixth 17 N. Arulsamy, J. Glerup and D. J. Hodgson, Inorg. Chem.,
position of the pyridine ring, and in these cases both the steric 1994, 33, 3043.
and electronic factors prevent the formation of peroxo-brid- 18 Y.-M. Lee, E.-S. Kim, H.-J. Kim, H. J. Choi, Y.-I. Kim,
ging. All the complexes show phenoxazinone synthase mimick-
S. K. Kang and S.-N. Choi, Dalton Trans., 2009, 126.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 7760–7770 | 7769