M.M.C.H. van Schie et al.
Molecular Catalysis 452 (2018) 277–283
Fig. 5. Photochemical reduction of
deazariboflavin using NADH (A) or
EDTA (B) as sacrificial electron donor
under aerobic (♦) and anaerobic (
)
conditions. Conditions: 10 mM EDTA
or 1 mM NADH, 100 mM KPi buffer pH
6.0, blue LED light setup, max light
intensity, RT. (For interpretation of the
references to colour in this figure le-
gend, the reader is referred to the web
version of this article.)
Table 1
higher electron densities around the N-atom of the donors facilitate the
electron transfer to dRf. These observations are in line with the oxi-
dation mechanism suggested by Kramer and coworkers [67]. These
authors suggested a methylene radical intermediate being formed after
single electron transfer of the amino acid donor and subsequent dec-
arboxylation. The extend of hyperconjugative stabilisation of this in-
termediate radical should increase with the N-substitution pattern as
well as with occurrence of a non-protonated N-substituent.
Aerobic reoxidation rates observed for deazariboflavin reduced by EDTA or
NADH.
Reoxidation rate [μM h−1]
Dark
Light
(
dRf)
2
1.7
0.78
96
30
H
2
dRf
red
To further examine the applicability of photoreduced dRf to re-
Conditions: 10 mM EDTA or 1 mM NADH, 100 mM KPi buffer pH 6.0, blue LED
light setup, max light intensity, RT.
generate oxidoreductases, we used it to reduce the FMN-dependent old
yellow enzyme homologue from Bacillus subtilis (YqjM) [36,68,69]. The
ox
different spectral properties of dRf (λmax = 390 nm) and YqjM-bound
ox
FMN (λmax = 455 nm) allow for the simultaneous determination and
red
quantification of the electron transfer between photoregenerated dRf
ox
and YqjM-bound FMN (Fig. 3). In accordance to previous findings by
Massey and Hemmerich [70] we found that photoregeneration of YqjM
was possible. Using e.g. 1.5 eq of (prior reduced) dRf full reduction of
YqjM was observed within 4 minutes. This reaction was observed under
blue light illumination only. Incubation of YqjM with prereduced dRf in
the dark or upon illumination with other wavelengths yielded no sig-
nificant reduction of the YqjM-bound FMN (Fig. S4.8). Currently, we
are lacking a satisfactory explanation for this observation. Possibly the
red
interaction of (dRf)
2
with the enzyme-bound FMN is sterically hin-
dered and photoexcitation of the latter may accelerated the long-dis-
tance electron transfer.
To test if catalytic turnover of both, dRf and YqjM is feasible, we
used the enantioselective reduction of 2-methyl cyclohexanone to (R)-
2-methyl cyclohexanone as model reaction (Fig. 4). In the absence of
dRf no conversion of the starting material was observed indicating that
direct photochemical reduction of YqjM-bound FMN by EDTA was not
efficient. However, already in the presence of 5 μM dRf (equimolar to
−
1
1
YqjM) a product formation rate of approximately 50 μM h
served. Hence, a turnover frequency of approximately 10 h
was ob-
was cal-
Fig. 6. EPR spectra recorded using the spin trap technique during the aerobic
reduction of dRf with BNAH under illumination (black) and in dark (red).
Conditions: 60 μM dRf, 1 mM BNAH, 1% v/v DMSO, 100 mM KPi pH 6.0, Kaiser
Fibre Optic Lighting system 15 V, 150 W, on half intensity, aerobic conditions.
−
culated for YqjM and dRf. This corresponds well to the YqjM-reduction
rate observed before (Fig. 3) indicating that the reduction of the bio-
catalyst was overall rate-limiting. The overall rate of the photoenzy-
matic reduction reaction increased steadily with increasing photo-
catalyst concentration (up to 200 μM, representing the solubility limit
(For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is
referred to the web version of this article.)
−
1
for dRf). With it, the catalytic efficiency of YqjM increased to 40 h . It
is worth mentioning that in all experiments (R)-2-methyl cyclohex-
anone was formed almost exclusively (Fig. S4.9).
overall rate limiting. Varying the concentration of the sacrificial elec-
tron donor (EDTA) revealed a saturation-type dependency of the dRf
reduction rate on the EDTA concentration applied (Fig. 2C). Above
approximately 1.5–2 mM EDTA (pH 6), no further increase of the dRf
reduction rate was observed. Finally, there was a sigmoidal pH-de-
While these numbers are comparable to recently reported photo-
enzymatic systems,[46] the catalytic performance of YqjM falls back by
−1
orders of magnitude behind its potential (1.8 s
using NADPH as re-
ox
pendency of the dRf reduction rate with a turning point at approxi-
ductant) [36]. A plausible explanation for this is to assume an un-
favourable interaction of the reduced dRf mediators with the enzyme-
bound FMN resulting in poor electron transfer rates. Both, cofactor- and
enzyme engineering may generate artificial binding sites and thereby
accelerate the regeneration reaction [72,73].
mately pH 9 (Fig. 2D). Interestingly, using MOPS instead of EDTA
shifted this turning point to pH 7 (Fig. S4.7). Furthermore, the sub-
stitution pattern of the N-atom in the sacrificial electron donor had an
influence on the reduction rate (Fig. S4.4). Overall, it appears that
281