Carbonyl Oxygen Tensors in Amides
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 47, 2000 11605
spinning frequencies were 12-15 kHz. For the stationary 17O NMR
experiments, a Hahn-echo sequence was used to eliminate acoustic
ringing from the probe. Typical recycle delays were between 2 and 10
s. A liquid sample of H2O (25% 17O atom) was used for RF power
calibration as well as for chemical shift referencing. Spectral simulations
were performed with the WSOLIDS program package (Klaus Eichele
and Rod Wasylishen, Dalhousie University).
Quantum Chemical Calculations. All quantum chemical calcula-
tions on 17O EFG and CS tensors were carried out using the Gaussian98
program28 on a Pentium II personal computer (400 MHz, 128 MB RAM,
12 GB disk space). The basis set of Dunning/Huzinaga double-ú,29
including polarization functions, D95**, and the B3LYP exchange
functional30 were employed. The Gauge-Included Atomic Orbital
(GIAO) approach31 was used for chemical shielding calculations. The
experimental geometry of acetanilide determined by a neutron diffrac-
tion study32 was used. For benzanilide and N-methylbenzamide, the
crystal structures obtained from X-ray diffraction studies were used.33,34
However, it is well-known that the N-H bond lengths measured by
X-ray diffraction are generally not accurate as compared to those
measured by the neutron diffraction technique. For this reason, the X-ray
N-H bond lengths for benzanilide and N-methylbenzamide were
corrected to a standard value, r(N-H) ) 1.030 Å.35
To make direct comparison between the calculated chemical shield-
ing, σ, and the observed chemical shift, δ, we used the absolute 17O
chemical shielding scale established by Wasylishen and co-workers36
Figure 2. Experimental (upper trace) and calculated (lower trace) 17
O
MAS NMR spectra for (A) [17O]benzanilide (1), (B) [17O]N-methyl-
benzamide (2), and (C) [17O]acetanilide (3). The peaks marked by an
asterisk (*) arise from the MAS rotor material, ZrO2.
δ ) 307.9 ppm - σ
(15)
For the quadrupole interaction, because the quantum chemical
calculations yield EFG tensor components, qii, in atomic units (a.u.),
the following equation was used to convert them to the quadrupolar
tensor components, øii, in MHz
we obtained Q(17O) ) -2.33 fm2 at the B3LYP/D95** level. This
value is in excellent agreement with the calibrated Q value at similar
DFT levels reported by De Luca et al.40
øii [MHz] ) e2Qqiih-1 ) -2.3496Q[fm2]qii [a.u.]
(16)
Results and Discussion
where Q is the nuclear quadrupole moment of the 17O nucleus (in fm2)
and the factor of 2.3496 results from unit conversion. In the literature,
the recommended Q value for 17O is -2.558 fm2.37 However, several
recent studies have demonstrated that, at different levels of theory, it
is more advantageous to use “calibrated” Q values, rather than the
standard Q value, to make direct comparison between the calculated
and experimental 17O QCCs.38-40 Following this calibration approach,
17O EFG and CS Tensors. Figure 2 shows the experimental
and simulated 17O magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR spectra
for compounds 1-3. Each of the MAS spectra exhibits a typical
line shape arising from the second-order quadrupole interaction.
The large line width of approximately 10-12 kHz indicates
the presence of a sizable quadrupole coupling constant (QCC).
From the spectral simulation, we were able to obtain the 17O
isotropic chemical shift, the QCC, and the asymmetry parameter
for each of the three compounds. It should be noted that, because
the spinning sideband intensities are not completely negligible,
the simulated MAS line shapes shown in Figure 2 differ slightly
from the experimental spectra at the low-frequency end of the
line shape. The observed 17O isotropic chemical shifts for
compounds 1-3, ca. 300 ppm, are typical for amide oxygen
functional groups.4 The magnitude of the carbonyl 17O QCCs
found for compounds 1-3, ca. 8-9 MHz, is also consistent
with previous determinations for the amide oxygen.22,23,41 The
detailed 17O NMR results for compounds 1-3 are summarized
in Table 1.
To obtain the information about the 17O CS tensors, we
obtained the stationary 17O NMR spectra for compounds 1-3.
As shown in Figure 3, the stationary 17O NMR spectra exhibit
line shapes covering a frequency range of approximately 50
kHz, which is much larger than those of the MAS spectra. As
already mentioned, analysis of the 17O MAS spectra has yielded
the isotropic 17O chemical shift, QCC, and η. To analyze the
stationary 17O NMR spectra, we need to determine the remaining
five variables: two independent CS tensor components and three
(28) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A.; Stratmann,
R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K.
N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi,
R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.;
Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.;
Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J.
V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.;
Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng,
C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.;
Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, Revision A.6; Gaussian, Inc.:
Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
(29) Dunning, T. H.; Hay, P. J. In Modern Theoretical Chemistry;
Schaefer, H. F., Ed.; Plenum: New York, 1976; Vol. 3, p 1.
(30) (a) Becke, A. D. Phys. ReV. 1988, A38, 3098. (b) Lee, C.; Yang,
W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. 1988, B37, 785. (c) Becke, A. D. J. Chem.
Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
(31) (a) Ditchfield, R. Mol. Phys. 1974, 27, 789. (b) Wolinski, K.; Hilton,
J. F.; Pulay, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8257.
(32) Johnson, S. W.; Eckert, J.; Barthes, M.; McMullan, R. K.; Muller,
M. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 16253.
(33) Kashio, S.; Ito, K.; Haisa, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 365.
(34) Leiserowitz, L.; Tuval, M. Acta Crystallogr. 1978, B34, 1230.
(35) (a) Taylor, R.; Kennard, O. Acta Crystallgr. 1983, B39, 133. (b)
Taylor, R.; Kennard, O.; Versichel, W. Acta Crystallogr. 1984, B40, 280.
(36) Wasylishen, R. E.; Mooibroek, S.; Macdonald, J. B. J. Chem. Phys.
1984, 81, 1057.
(37) Pyykko¨, P. Z. Naturforsch. 1992, 47a, 189.
(38) Eggenberger, R.; Gerber, S.; Huber, H.; Searles, D.; Welker, M. J.
Mol. Spectrosc. 1992, 151, 474.
(39) (a) Ludwig, R.; Weinhold, F.; Farrar, T. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1995,
103, 6941. (b) Ludwig, R.; Weinhold, F.; Farrar, T. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1996,
105, 8223.
(40) De Luca, G.; Russo, N.; Ko¨ster, A. M.; Calaminici, P.; Jug, K. Mol.
Phys. 1999, 97, 347.
(41) (a) Takahashi, A.; Kuroki, S.; Ando, I.; Ozaki, T.; Shoji, A. J. Mol.
Struct. 1998, 442, 195. (b) Yamauchi, K.; Kuroki, S.; Ando, I.; Ozaki, T.;
Shoji, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 302, 331.