proceeded smoothly as expected to give the diol in excellent
yield. Optimization was required only of the solvent ratio to
a mixture of 18:1:1 acetone/t-BuOH/water. This new solvent
mixture became our standard condition because it facilitated
isolation of the diols. In addition, the dihydroxylation of
potassium 4-vinylphenyltrifluoroborate 1c (entry 3) demon-
strated that the same reaction conditions are applicable to
aryltrifluoroborates.
heteroatom â to the boron. Normally, organoboron com-
pounds with an electronegative atom, such as oxygen, at the
â-position eliminate rapidly via tetracoordination to the boron
(eq 2). This elimination process has been attributed to the
thermodynamic stability of the boron-oxygen bond.15 To
4
the best of our knowledge, only limited examples of this
15,17
type of organoboron compound have been reported.
Our next aim was to carry out the dihydroxylation on more
highly substituted olefins. Interestingly, 1,1-disubstituted
alkyltrifluoroborate 1d (entry 4) proved to be sensitive to
the reaction conditions. The apparent low yield reflects the
inability of all of the product to precipitate in pure form from
the reaction mixture. Thus, the majority of the product co-
precipitated with an impurity that could not be separated from
the desired dihydroxytrifluoroborate under several different
In the event, dihydroxylation of potassium allyltrifluo-
roborate, 5, proceeded smoothly under the reaction conditions
described previously (Scheme 2).
1
11
19
isolation protocols. On the basis of H, B, and F NMR,
we suspect cyclized product 3 as the impurity (Scheme 1),
Scheme 2
Scheme 1
Isolation of diol 6 was easily achieved using the cation
18
exchange protocol reported by Batey and Quach. Tetraco-
ordination of the boron atom by fluoride as well as the
strength of the B-F bond prevented oxidative cleavage and
protonolysis of the trifluoroborate moiety in this and our
6
earlier examples; these characteristics have now been
employed to prevent â-elimination as well.
The Suzuki-Miyaura-type coupling of potassium organ-
which would be generated by displacement of a fluoride by
one of the hydroxy groups of the diol. Similar behavior was
also observed in the dihydroxylation of organotrifluoroborate
otrifluoroborates has been the subject of extensive study in
4.
5
a
our group. Dihydroxylated alkyl- and aryltrifluoroborates
were anticipated to be good coupling partners. The presence
of free hydroxy groups was deemed unlikely to present a
problem because the cross-coupling reactions are often run
using alcohols as solvents. Therefore, the diols were sub-
jected to the cross-coupling reactions without the use of
protecting groups. The optimized reaction conditions reported
by our group for the Suzuki-Miyaura-type coupling reaction
between alkyltrifluoroborates and aryl bromides employ
Nevertheless, 1,1-disubstituted olefins can be successfully
dihydroxylated and isolated as shown by aryltrifluoroborate
e (entry 5). Diols from 1,2-disubstituted olefin-containing
organotrifluoroborates were also obtained in good yield
1
(
entries 6 and 7). Trisubstituted olefins are usually challeng-
10,15
ing substrates in cis-dihydroxylation.
This problem has
been attributed to slow hydrolysis of the intermediate osmate-
(
VI) ester, which results in low turnover in the catalytic
10,16
cycle.
The dihydroxylation of potassium 7-methyl-6-
octenyl trifluoroborate 1h, containing a trisubstituted olefin,
was achieved in good yield without the need to facilitate
the hydrolysis process (entry 8).
The lower yields for diols 2e, 2g, and 2h can be attributed
to difficulties associated with isolation. These products did
not precipitate readily.
PdCl
2
(dppf)‚CH
2
Cl
2
(9 mol %) and CsCO
3
(3 equiv) as a
base, heated to reflux in a 10:1 THF:H
2
O mixture.19 Thus,
with the potassium dihydroxytrifluoroborate 2b in hand, we
conducted a cross-coupling reaction with 4-cyanophenyl
bromide under these conditions to afford 4-cyanophenyl-1,2-
butanediol 7 in 65% yield after column chromatography (eq
3).
The dihydroxylation of potassium allyltrifluoroborate was
of particular interest because the diol produced contains a
(
17) Pereira, S.; Srebnik, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3283.
(
15) Ray, R.; Matteson, D. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 449.
(18) Batey, R. A.; Quach, T. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 9099.
(19) (a) Molander, G. A.; Ito, T. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 393. (b) Molander,
G. A.; Yun, C.-S.; Ribagorda, M.; Biolatto, B. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
5534.
(16) (a) Akashi, K.; Palermo, R. E.; Sharpless, B. K. J. Org. Chem. 1978,
4
1
3, 2063. (b) Sharpless, B. K.; Akashi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98,
986.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 1, 2006
77