improve the signal-to-noise ratio. All experimental operations were
carried out at room temperature. The data were analyzed using the open
source image software ImagePro. All the photoluminescence spectra
were measured in air unless otherwise noted. The time-resolved
fluorescence decay curves of the as-fabricated products were estimated
on an FLS 980 spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments, UK) using a
picosecond Ti:Sapphire laser (Mira HP, from Coherent) as the excitation
source. The decay profiles of the synthesized products were fitted by a
biexponential function of I(t) = A1 exp(−t/τ1) + A2 exp(−t/τ2), where I(t)
is the fluorescence intensity at time t, A1 and A2 are the preexponential
factors, and τ1 and τ2 are the lifetimes.
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (021314380133
and 021314380084). The authors are grateful to the High Performance
Computing Center (HPCC) of Nanjing University for doing the numerical
calculations in this paper on its IBM Blade cluster system.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Photocatalytic CO2 Conversion Test: The photocatalytic activity of the
as-synthesized samples was estimated based on the photocatalytic
reduction of CO2 under irradiation from a 300 W Xe lamp with a
cut-off filter (λ ≥ 420 nm). Typically, the prepared powders (0.1 g) were
homogeneously dispersed on a glass reactor with an area of 4.2 cm2.
The volume of the reaction system was ≈230 mL. High-purity CO2 gas
(99.999%) was introduced into the reaction system to reach ambient
pressure after the system was vacuum-treated several times. Then,
0.4 mL of deionized water was injected into the reaction system as the
reducing agent. During irradiation, ≈1 mL of gas was withdrawn from
the reaction tank at a given interval and used for the CH4 concentration
analysis by gas chromatography (GC-2014, Shimadzu Corp, Japan). The
AQE for CO2 reduction was measured using the same experimental
procedure except a monochromatic bandpass filter (Y50, 500 nm) was
employed. The number of photons reaching the catalyst was measured
using a spectroradiometer (LS-100, EKO Instruments Co., LTD.).
Assuming that the incident photons were completely absorbed by the
catalyst, the total number of incident photons at 500 nm was estimated
to be 2.36 × 1021 photon h−1.
Theoretical Calculations: All calculations were performed using the
Cambridge Series Total Energy Pack (CASTEP) code[38] employing the
ultrasoft pseudopotential, and the exchange and correlation effects were
described by PBEsol in a generalized gradient approximation (GGA).[39]
The Monkhorst–Pack scheme K-points grid sampling was set as 3 × 3 × 1
or 5 × 2 × 1 for the irreducible Brillouin zone. The fast Fourier transform
grid was set as 36 × 30 × 288 or 20 × 45 × 540. The Kohn–Sham wave
function was extended using an energy cutoff value of 380 eV. The
convergence criterion was as follows: maximum force on the atom is
0.01 eV Å−1, maximum stress on the atom is 0.02 GPa, maximum atomic
displacement is 0.0004 Å, and the maximum energy change per atom
is 5 × 10−6 eV. In order to improve the computational accuracy, dipole
calibration was applied to all models. Finally, the electronic structure was
calculated based on the optimized models. The heterostructure models
possess 8 layers of BiVO4 (96 atoms) and 12 layers of Au (96 atoms).
Between the BiVO4/Au heterostructure slabs, a 20 Å thickness vacuum
layer is added to eliminate the mirror-image interaction of 3D periodic
boundary conditions. Based on the optimized models, the electron
density could be estimated. On the other hand, the energy eigenvalue
also could be obtained in the self-consistent field calculation. According
to the definition, the Fermi energy is further calculated in the present
work.
Keywords
charge separation, CO2 reduction, photocatalysis, Schottky junctions,
Z-scheme photocatalysts
Received: February 14, 2018
Revised: May 15, 2018
Published online:
[1] M. G. Walter, E. L. Warren, J. R. McKone, S. W. Boettcher, Q. Mi,
E. A. Santori, N. S. Lewis, Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6446.
[2] J. L. White, M. F. Baruch, J. E. PanderIII, Y. Hu, I. C. Fortmeyer,
J. E. Park, T. Zhang, K. Liao, J. Gu, Y. Yan, T. W. Shaw, E. Abelev,
A. B. Bocarsly, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12888.
[3] P. Zhou, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4920.
[4] H. J. Li, Y. Zhou, W. G. Tu, J. H. Ye, Z. G. Zou, Adv. Funct. Mater.
2015, 25, 998.
[5] H. J. Li, Y. Y. Gao, Y. Zhou, F. T. Fan, Q. T. Han, Q. F. Xu, X. Y. Wang,
M. Xiao, C. Li, Z. G. Zou, Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 5547.
[6] A. Iwase, Y. H. Ng, Y. Ishiguro, A. Kudo, R. Amal, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 11054.
[7] H. Tada, T. Mitsui, T. Kiyonaga, T. Akita, K. Tanaka, Nat. Mater.
2006, 5, 782.
[8] Q. Wang, T. Hisatomi, Q. X. Jia, H. Tokudome, M. Zhong,
C. Z. Wang, Z. H. Pan, T. Takata, M. Nakabayashi, N. Shibata,
Y. B. Li, I. D. Sharp, A. Kudo, T. Yamada, K. Domen, Nat. Mater.
2016, 15, 611.
[9] Q. Wang, T. Hisatomi, Y. Suzuki, Z. H. Pan, J. Seo, M. Katayama,
T. Minegishi, H. Nishiyama, T. Takata, K. Seki, A. Kudo, T. Yamada,
K. Domen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1675.
[10] S. J. Moniz, S. A. Shevlin, D. J. Martin, Z. X. Guo, J. W. Tang, Energy
Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 731.
[11] M. R. Khan, T. W. Chuan, A. Yousuf, M. N. Chowdhury, C. K. Cheng,
Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 2522.
[12] L. L. Wang, J. Ge, A. L. Wang, M. S. Deng, X. J. Wang, S. Bai, R. Li,
J. Jiang, Q. Zhang, Y. Luo, Y. J. Xiong, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014,
53, 5107.
[13] M. G. Kibria, S. Zhao, F. A. Chowdhury, Q. Wang, H. P. T. Nguyen,
M. L. Trudeau, H. Gu, Z. Mi, Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3825.
[14] R. G. Li, F. X. Zhang, D. Wang, J. X. Yang, M. R. Li, J. Zhu, X. Zhou,
H. X. Han, C. Li, Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1432.
[15] J. Zhu, F. T. Fan, R. T. Chen, H. Y. An, Z. C. Feng, C. Li, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9111.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or
from the author.
[16] L. C. Mu, Y. Zhao, A. L. Li, S. Y. Wang, Z. L. Wang, J. X. Yang,
Y. Wang, T. F. Liu, R. T. Chen, J. Zhu, F. T. Fan, R. G. Li, C. Li, Energy
Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 2463.
[17] P. Li, Y. Zhou, Z. Y. Zhao, Q. F. Xu, X. Y. Wang, M. Xiao, Z. G. Zou,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9547.
[18] J. Yu, J. Low, W. Xiao, P. Zhou, M. Jaroniec, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014,
136, 8839.
[19] X. Liu, G. Dong, S. Li, G. Lu, Y. Bi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138,
2917.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported primarily by the National Basic Research Program
of China (2013CB632404), the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(51572121, 21603098, and 21633004), the Natural Science Foundation
of Jiangsu Province (BK20151265, BK20151383, and BK20150580), the
Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2017M611784), and the
©
Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 1801214
1801214 (9 of 10)
2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim