Enantioselective biosynthesis of L-phenyllactic acid by whole cells of recombinant Escherichia coli

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules22111966

Background: L-Phenyllactic acid (L-PLA)—a valuable building block in the pharmaceutical and chemical industry—has recently emerged as an important monomer in the composition of the novel degradable biocompatible material of polyphenyllactic acid. However, both normally chemically synthesized and naturally occurring phenyllactic acid are racemic, and the product yields of reported L-PLA synthesis processes remain unsatisfactory. Methods: We developed a novel recombinant Escherichia coli strain, co-expressing L-lactate dehydrogenase (L-LDH) from Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum and glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) from Bacillus megaterium, to construct a recombinant oxidation/reduction cycle for whole-cell biotransformation of phenylpyruvic acid (PPA) into chiral L-PLA in an enantioselective and continuous manner. Results: During fed-batch bioconversion with intermittent PPA feeding, L-PLA yield reached 103.8 mM, with an excellent enantiomeric excess of 99.7%. The productivity of L-PLA was as high as 5.2 mM·h^?1 per OD₆₀₀ (optical density at 600 nm) of whole cells. These results demonstrate the efficient production of L-PLA by the one-pot biotransformation system. Therefore, this stereoselective biocatalytic process might be a promising alternative for L-PLA production.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules22111966

molecules
Article
Enantioselective Biosynthesis of L-Phenyllactic Acid
by Whole Cells of Recombinant Escherichia coli
Yibo Zhu 1,2, Ying Wang 1,3, Jiayuzi Xu 1, Jiahao Chen 1, Limei Wang 1,2 and Bin Qi 1,2,
*
1
School of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Changshu Institute of Technology, Changshu 215500, China;
centuryrain@cslg.edu.cn (Y.Z.); 15895618691@163.com (Y.W.); XJM337463903@163.com (J.X.);
15606238552@163.com (J.C.); wlmqb@126.com (L.W.)
Key Laboratory of Food and Biotechnology of Suzhou, Changshu Institute of Technology,
Changshu 215500, China
2
3
College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
Correspondence: qibin65@126.com; Tel.: +86-136-1623-5465
*
Received: 25 October 2017; Accepted: 6 November 2017; Published: 15 November 2017
Abstract: Background: L-Phenyllactic acid (L-PLA)—a valuable building block in the pharmaceutical
and chemical industry—has recently emerged as an important monomer in the composition of
the novel degradable biocompatible material of polyphenyllactic acid. However, both normally
chemically synthesized and naturally occurring phenyllactic acid are racemic, and the product yields
of reported L-PLA synthesis processes remain unsatisfactory. Methods: We developed a novel
recombinant Escherichia coli strain, co-expressing L-lactate dehydrogenase (L-LDH) from Lactobacillus
plantarum subsp. plantarum and glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) from Bacillus megaterium, to construct
a recombinant oxidation/reduction cycle for whole-cell biotransformation of phenylpyruvic acid
(PPA) into chiral L-PLA in an enantioselective and continuous manner. Results: During fed-batch
bioconversion with intermittent PPA feeding, L-PLA yield reached 103.8 mM, with an excellent
enantiomeric excess of 99.7%. The productivity of L-PLA was as high as 5.2 mM
h−1 per OD600
·
(optical density at 600 nm) of whole cells. These results demonstrate the efficient production of L-PLA
by the one-pot biotransformation system. Therefore, this stereoselective biocatalytic process might be
a promising alternative for L-PLA production.
Keywords:
L-Phenyllactic acid;
L-Lactate dehydrogenase;
glucose dehydrogenase;
NADH regeneration; whole-cell transformation
1. Introduction
The development of novel natural antimicrobial compounds to preserve food and feed has
gained importance in recent years due to the increasing demand for chemical preservative-free
products by consumers and the increased interest in food biopreservation [
(2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoic acid; PLA)—a special chemical widely used for the synthesis of chiral
pharmaceutical and biorefinery chemicals, including bio-based polymers [ ]—has been recently identified
as a novel natural antiseptic agent with broad-spectrum and effective inhibitory activity against a variety
of food-borne microorganisms, including a wide range of bacteria and fungi [ ]. In addition, PLA is the
1,2]. 3-Phenyllactic acid
3
4–8
monomer for synthesis of the novel biocompatible poly(phenyllactide). Due to containing an aromatic
ring, PLA and its dimer are particularly interesting monomers with different properties than those of
polylactide [9,10]. As a result of a chiral carbon atom in its molecule, PLA occurs as two enantiomers,
L-3-phenyllactic acid (L-PLA) and D-3-phenyllactic acid (D-PLA), both of which are valuable chiral building
blocks but have different biological functions, leading to their various applications in the pharmaceutical
and chemical industries [11]. D-PLA is applied in the synthesis of hypoglycemic drugs and high-efficiency
and low-toxicity anthelmintics, while L-PLA is an important precursor for the synthesis of the non-protein
Molecules 2017, 22, 1966; doi:10.3390/molecules22111966
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules

Molecules 2017, 22, 1966
2 of 11
amino acid statine, anti-HIV drugs, and biodegradable poly(PLA), clearly indicating that the optical purity
of stereoisomeric monomers plays a very important role in their applications [ 12 14]. Especially for
3, –
food and pharmaceutical purposes, chiral monomers with high optical purity and low impurity levels
are a prerequisite to avoid toxicosis and isomeric ballast [15]. Therefore, the preparation of optically
pure chiral isomers has been one of the central subjects in pharmaceutical and food industries and chiral
chemical production.
Various approaches for preparing PLA have been developed in recent years, including traditional
chemical methods, enzymatic routes, and biological methods [16–20]. Through traditional chemical
synthesis methods, chiral isomers have been produced with high yields and high conversion
rates, but at the expense of the environment and extreme reaction conditions. Even chemical
processes for chiral isomer production results in the racemic mixture of both stereospecific forms.
Contrary to chemical synthesis, biocatalytic asymmetric synthesis has recently aroused great interest
among industry and academia owing to its high conversion yield, high efficiency, simple operation,
environment-friendly nature, and, in particular, its excellent stereoselectivity [21,22]. In addition,
complex processes for enzyme separation and purification can be omitted by utilizing microbial
whole cells as a biocatalyst, as well as the supplementary addition of cofactors and cofactor
regeneration enzymes. Therefore, microbial whole-cell biocatalysis might be recognized as the most
promising approach applicable for the asymmetric synthesis of chiral isomers. Thus far, the use
of natural microorganisms to produce PLA has been well-studied in lactic acid bacteria, such as
Lactobacillus [6,23–25], Enterococcus [7], and Leuconostoc [19,26]. However, few studies have reported
L-PLA production by means of asymmetric synthesis by microorganisms, unlike D-PLA [27–29].
Here, we report the development of a recombinant E. coli strain co-expressing L-lactate
dehydrogenase (L-ldh) from Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum and glucose dehydrogenase
(gdh) from Bacillus megaterium in an inducible overexpression vector to construct a recombinant
oxidation/reduction cycle for whole-cell biotransformation of phenylpyruvic acid (PPA) to chiral
L-PLA (Figure 1). Enzymatic activity and the enantioselective reduction of PPA to L-PLA were
evaluated. An efficient and desirable bioconversion process for L-PLA production by the regeneration
of the in situ cofactor nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) was developed.
Figure 1. Scheme for the production of L-PLA from PPA by the NADH-dependent L-LDH and GDH
coupling system. NADH represents the reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide.

Molecules 2017, 22, 1966
3 of 11
2. Results
2.1. Cloning and Co-Expression of L-ldh and gdh in E. coli
The PCR products matched the length of L-ldh (963 bp) and gdh (786 bp). Nucleotide sequencing
indicated that the cloned L-ldh, encoding 320 amino acids, has a 100% similarity with the nucleotide
sequence of L. plantarum ATCC 14917 L-ldh (GenBank No. ACGZ02000027) and that the cloned gdh,
encoding 261 amino acids, has a 99% similarity with the nucleotide sequence of B. megaterium WSH-002
gdh (GenBank No. NC 017138).
SDS-PAGE of the cell-free extracts showed that the recombinant L-LDH (40 kDa) and GDH (27 kDa)
proteins were co-expressed successfully in recombinant E. coli strains (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Validation of the expression of L-LDH and GDH in induced recombinant E. coli. Lane 1:
protein marker; lane 2: E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh; lane 3: E. coli pETDuet-ldhL; lane 4: E. coli pETDuet-1;
lane 5: E. coli BL21 (DE3).
2.2. Enzyme Assays of L-LDH and GDH
One of the most successful NADH regeneration systems is glucose dehydrogenase
(GDH; E.C.1.1.1.47) owing to its high activity and its substrate glucose, which is a cheap source
of reducing equivalent. For the replenishment of the intracellular NADH pool, which decreased during
whole-cell bioconversions with resting cells, we attempted the overexpression of gdh under the control
of the lac promoter in the pET system. GDH activity was detected in strain E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh
(5.37
±
0.74 U
mg−1) but not in E. coli pETDuet-ldhL and E. coli pETDuet-1 (Table 1), which indicated
·
that GDH was successfully expressed in E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh. Unlike E. coli pETDuet-1, both E.
coli pETDuet-ldhL and E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh showed LDH activity (Table 1), indicating that L-LDH
was successfully expressed in both strains and had catalytic function.
Table 1. Specific activity of L-LDH and GDH of recombinant strains.
−1
−1
)
Strain
L-LDH Specific Activity (U mg
)
GDH Specific Activity (U mg
E. coli pETDuet-1
E. coli pETDuet-ldhL
E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh
ND
ND
ND
5.37 ± 0.74
28.11 ± 1.17
9.48 ± 0.91
ND: not detected or specific activity <0.1 U mg−1
.
2.3. Optimization of Bioconversion Conditions
To increase the efficiency of L-PLA production by E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh, the biocatalytic factors were
optimized for the concentrations of PPA, glucose, and whole cells; temperature; and pH. First, the highest

Molecules 2017, 22, 1966
4 of 11
L-PLA production was detected at 42 ◦C (Figure 3A). Within the range of the thermal tolerance of E.
coli, the high temperature increased the solubility and dissolution rate of PPA, contributing to effective
conversion of PPA into PLA at a high concentration and with high productivity. Then, because pH
would considerably affect the enzyme activity and stability, the effect of pH on this L-LDH and GDH
coupling system was also investigated. L-PLA production was the highest at pH 7.0 (Figure 3B).
Under acidic or alkaline conditions, the bioconversion of PPA to L-PLA decreased. Next, taking
economic efficiency into consideration, the optimal concentration of cells was determined to be
OD600 = 25 (Figure 3C). Furthermore, the optimal PPA concentration was determined to be 80 mM
(Figure 3D), while the concentration of the co-substrate (glucose) between 100 mM to 200 mM elicited
no apparent influence on L-PLA production (Figure 3E). In addition, the L-PLA production had a
significant improvement in the presence of glucose (Figure 3E). Thus, the concentration of glucose was
determined to be 100 mM for the following experiments.
Figure 3. Optimization of bioconversion conditions. (A) Temperature; (B) pH; (C) Concentration of
whole cells; (D) Concentration of PPA; (E) Concentration of glucose.
2.4. Enhancing L-PLA Production by a Cofactor Regeneration System
To identify the enhancement of L-PLA production by a cofactor regeneration system,
E. coli pETDuet-ldhL or E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh whole cells were used as the biocatalyst, respectively, in
the batch bioconversion under optimal conditions. The processes were performed in 100 mL flasks with
10 mL of a 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 50 mM PPA, 100 mM glucose, and E. coli
pETDuet-ldhL or E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh whole cells (OD600 = 25) at 42 ◦C and 200 rpm. After 40 min
bioconversion, 68.80% of PPA was converted into L-PLA by E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh, while only 58.92% of
PPA was converted into L-PLA by E. coli pETDuet-ldhL (Figure 4). Moreover, 97.83% of PPA was consumed
by E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh and only 86.50% by E. coli pETDuet-ldhL. These differences suggested that the
strain with the recombinant NADH regeneration system showed a higher PLA production rate and higher
PPA consumption yield than that without a sufficient cofactor regeneration system.
In addition, higher L-LDH activity (Table 1) but lower L-PLA production ability (Figure 4) by
E. coli pETDuet-ldhL in comparison with E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh indicated the crucial importance
of an in situ NADH regeneration system. On the other hand, up to 30% of PPA was not converted
into PLA but other metabolites (Figure 4). Redesigning of the wild-type L-LDH gene and eliminating

Molecules 2017, 22, 1966
5 of 11
pathways that compete for NADH utilization by the knockout of D-LDH gene and other genes could
improve L-PLA production.
Figure 4. Comparison of batch biotransformation of L-PLA by E. coli pETDuet-ldhL and E. coli
pETDuet-ldhL-gdh whole cells. White indicates L-PLA; black indicates residual PPA; and grey indicates PPA
involved in other metabolic routes but PLA.
2.5. Fed-Batch Bioconversion of L-PLA
Fed-batch bioconversion was performed with intermittent PPA feeding to increase PLA yield and
avoid substrate inhibition. After 60 min of reaction (Figure 5), 103.8 mM of L-PLA with 99.7% ee was
achieved from 186.2 mM of PPA, with a high productivity of 103.8 mM
of 55.8% (Figure 5).
·
h−1 and final conversion ratio
Figure 5. Time course of L-PLA production in fed-batch bioconversion with intermittent substrate
feeding. (ꢀ) Concentration of PPA; (N) Concentration of L-PLA.
Furthermore, the bioconversion sample catalyzed by recombinant E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh whole
cells was proven to be L-PLA on the basis of the same retention time as that of the standard sample
containing D-PLA and L-PLA at 26 min (Figure 6).

Molecules 2017, 22, 1966
6 of 11
Figure 6. HPLC chiral analysis of PLA produced by whole cells of E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh.
(A) Standards of L-PLA and D-PLA; (B) Sample of conversion.
3. Discussion
L-PLA with an ee of 75% was obtained through whole-cell bioconversion of racemic
3-phenyllactonitrile using a Pseudomonas sp. BC-18 strain [13]. When fructose was used as the carbon
source, Rubrivivax benzoatilyticus JA2 yielded a maximum of 0.92 mM L-PLA from L-phenylalanine
(1 mM) [30]. Thus, further application of L-PLA has been limited by the unsatisfactory stereoselectivity
and low production ability of known L-PLA-producing strains. It has, therefore, been deemed
imperative for large-scale production of L-PLA to use high-producing strains [5].
As a paradigm organism for metabolic engineering, E. coli does not possess a sufficient cofactor
regeneration system. Most of the widely applied oxidoreductases require cofactors for their catalytic
activity. The representative cofactor NADH plays a central role in cellular metabolism in over
300 reduction–oxidation reactions [31], including the asymmetric reduction of PPA into L-PLA by
NADH-dependent L-LDH in this study. Therefore, in cofactor-dependent biotransformation systems,
if the enzyme is overexpressed and the enzyme level is not the bottleneck of the conversion, cofactor
availability and the ratio of the reduced to oxidized form of the cofactor may become limiting factors;
in this situation, cofactor manipulation is imperative for high productivity [32]. The regeneration of
NADH based on formate/formate dehydrogenase has been developed to the most advanced level [33].
However, the formate dehydrogenase system has drawbacks, especially for industrial applications,
such as only moderate stability and relatively low specific activity. Another general coenzyme NADH
regenerator, GDH, is a low-cost, highly active (>250 U
·
mg−1), and stable [34] option. GDH catalyzes
the oxidation of -D-glucose to -D-glucono-1,5-lactone, coupled with the simultaneous reduction of
β
β
the cofactor NAD(P)+ to NAD(P)H [35]. Because of the rapid hydrolysis of unstable gluconolactone
to gluconic acid, the GDH catalytic reaction is nearly irreversible, which provides a strong driving
force for NADH regeneration [36]. Recently, 79.6 mM L-PLA (ee > 99%) was produced by using
whole cells (OD600 = 50) of recombinant E. coli co-expressing NAD-dependent L-lactate dehydrogenase
(L-nLDH) from Bacillus coagulans NL01 and formate dehydrogenase from Candida boidinii after 40 min
of batch bioconversion [37]. In our study, during the first 20 min of fed-batch bioconversion (Figure 4),
45.0 mM L-PLA was produced with a bioconversion ratio of 59.9% by using whole cells (OD600 = 25)

Molecules 2017, 22, 1966
7 of 11
of recombinant E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh co-expressing L-lactate dehydrogenase from L. plantarum
and GDH from B. megaterium. A high bioconversion temperature of 42◦C contributed to the rapid
dissolution of PPA and high metabolic activity [20]. Per OD600 of E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh, the L-PLA
productivity was 5.2 mM h
−1, which was 1.26 times higher than that of E. coli reported by Zheng [37].
·
Nevertheless, the general conversion ratio of 55.8% (103.8 mM L-PLA from 186.2 mM PPA) of this
study was much less than the ratio of 96% of the report. The blast result of L-nLDH (Access number:
KF386111) and L-LDH of this study (Access number: EFK28653) indicated that the two enzymes
contain the identical substrate binding site residues and active site, with 153 of 309 identities and 217 of
309 positives. Whether the different origins of the two enzymes led to the differences in the conversion
ratio needs to be further studied.
In conclusion, a one-step bioconversion of PPA to L-PLA by whole cells of recombinant E. coli
harboring heterogeneous L-ldh and gdh was successfully developed. L-PLA was efficiently produced
by the one-pot biotransformation system. The yield of L-PLA reached 103.8 mM with an excellent ee
of 99.7% and high productivity of 103.8 mM h
−1. The novel biocatalysis process has great potential
·
as an alternative for the production of highly optically pure L-PLA at a high productivity and
high stereoselectivity.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Enzymes and Chemicals
Restriction enzymes, Ex Taq DNA polymerase, T4 DNA ligase, and the pMD19-T simple,
(TaKaRa, Dalian, China) cloning vector were purchased from TaKaRa Biotechnology Co. Ltd.
(Dalian, China). The expression vector pET-Duet-1 was obtained from Novagen (Madison, WI, USA).
PCR-related products, PCR primers, isopropyl-β
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), NADH, NAD+, and
ampicillin were purchased from Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). B-Per® reagent was obtained
from Pierce (Rockford, IL, USA). PPA in the chemical form of sodium phenylpyruvate, L-PLA, and D-PLA
were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All other chemicals were
of analytical grade and were sourced commercially.
4.2. Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions
The bacterial strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study are listed in Table 2. E. coli DH5α was
used as the cloning host. E. coli BL21 (DE3) was used for recombinant protein expression and whole-cell
biotransformation. The pMD19-T (Simple) cloning vector was used for gene cloning. The pETDuet-1
plasmid used for gene expression harbors two multiple cloning sites, both of which were preceded by the
◦
T7 promoter, lac operator, and ribosome-binding site. L. plantarum was routinely cultured at 37 C without
shaking in de Man Rogosa Sharpe (MRS) broth. E. coli strains and B. megaterium were cultivated at 37 ◦C
in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium or on agar plates, and ampicillin was added at a final concentration of
100 µg·mL−1, if necessary.
Table 2. Strains, plasmids and primers used in this study.
Strain, Plasmid or Primer
Relevant Characteristics
Source
Lactobacillus plantarum
Bacillus megaterium
Wild type, source of l-ldh
Wild type, source of gdh
CGMCC 1.2437
CCTCC M2013244
ϕ80 lacZ∆M15∆(lacZYA-argF) U169 recA1 endA1
hsdR17 supE44λ-thi-1
E. coli DH5α
Novagen
−
−
−
E. coli BL21(DE3)
E. coli pETDuet-1
E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh
E. coli pETDuet-ldhL
pMD19-T (Simple)
F
ompT hsdSB(rB mB )gal lonλdcm (DE3)
E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring pETDuet-1
Novagen
This study
This study
This study
TaKaRa
E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring pETDuet-ldhL-gdh
E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring pETDuet-ldhL
Cloning vector, Amp r

Molecules 2017, 22, 1966
8 of 11
Table 2. Cont.
Strain, Plasmid or Primer
Relevant Characteristics
Source
pMD-ldhL
pMD-gdh
pETDuet-1
pETDuet-ldhL
pETDuet-ldhL-gdh
P1 (BamH I)
P2 (Pst I)
l-ldh in pMD19-T
gdh in pMD19-T
This study
This study
Novagen
This study
This study
This study
Expression vector, Amp r
l-ldh in pETDuet-1
l-ldh and gdh in pETDuet-1
5’-AAGGGATCCATTGTCAAGCATGCCAAATC-3’
5’-CGCCTGCAGGGCCATTATTTATTTTCTAATTCAG-3’ This study
P3 (Nde I)
P4 (Xho I)
5’-GCGCCCATATGATGTATAAAGATTTAGAAGG-3’
5’-CTAGCTCGAGCATTATCCGCGTCCTGCTT-3’
This study
This study
r
The underlined character indicates the restriction sites. represents the resistance.
4.3. Cloning and Expression of L-ldh and gdh in E. coli BL21(DE3)
All DNA manipulations and bacterial transformations were carried out according to standard
protocols and instructions. Genomic DNAs of L. plantarum CGMCC 1.2437 and B. megaterium CCTCC
M2013244 were extracted as the templates for L-ldh and gdh PCR amplification, respectively. The
L-ldh gene was amplified by PCR using forward primer P1 with a BamHI restriction site insertion and
reverse primer P2 with a PstI restriction site insertion. The gdh gene was amplified by PCR using
forward primer P3 with a NdeI restriction site insertion and reverse primer P4 with an XhoI restriction
site insertion.
Purified PCR products were ligated into the pMD19-T (Simple) cloning vector, and the resulting
plasmids were designated as pMD-ldhL and pMD-gdh, respectively. Both the recombinant cloning
vectors were then sequenced (Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) to verify that no mutations
were introduced by PCR.
Next, to construct the recombinant co-expression plasmid pETDuet-ldhL-gdh, the recombinant
plasmid pMD-gdh was digested with restriction enzymes NdeI and XhoI. Next, the gel-purified gdh
fragment was ligated into the multiple cloning sites-2 of the pETDuet-1 vector that had been digested
with the corresponding restriction enzymes. The resulting plasmid was designated as pETDuet-gdh.
The recombinant plasmids pMD-ldhL and pETDuet-gdh, as well as the pETDuet-1 vector, were digested
with restriction enzymes BamHI and PstI. The gel-purified L-ldh fragments were then ligated into the
multiple cloning sites-2 of pETDuet-gdh and pETDuet-1 vector, respectively. Thus, pETDuet-ldhL and
pETDuet-ldhL-gdh were both constructed. Then, the recombinant expression plasmids pETDuet-ldhL
and pETDuet-ldhL-gdh were transformed into competent E. coli BL21 (DE3), and positive clones were
screened and confirmed by colony PCR and restriction enzyme digestion.
For protein expression, E. coli strains were incubated in LB medium containing 100
ampicillin, if necessary, with shaking (200 rpm) at 37 C. When the culture reached an optical density of
1.2 at 600 nm, 1 mM IPTG was added to induce the overexpression of L-LDH and GDH proteins. After
µg
mL−1
·
◦
◦
◦
induction at 25 C for 4 h, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6000
×
g for 5 min at 4 C, washed
twice, and resuspended with 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer. The resultant suspensions were
disrupted by B-Per® cell lysis reagent at 30 ◦C for 10 min. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation
at 12,000
×
g for 10 min at 4 ◦C. The obtained supernatants were used as cell-free extracts for crude
enzyme activity assays and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
4.4. Enzyme Assays
Enzyme activities were assayed by monitoring the changes in absorbance at 340 nm corresponding
to NADH oxidation or NAD+ reduction at 30 ◦C using fresh cell-free extracts. L-LDH activities on
PPA and pyruvate were assayed. The reaction mixture contained 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer
(pH 7.0), 0.2 mM NADH, and 10 mM pyruvate or PPA [20]. GDH activity was measured by the reaction
mixture containing 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0), 2 mM NAD+, and 100 mM glucose.

Molecules 2017, 22, 1966
9 of 11
One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzed the oxidation or
reduction of 1 mol NADH per minute. The protein concentration of cell-free extracts was determined
µ
using Lowry’s method, with bovine serum albumin as a standard. Specific activity was expressed as
units per milligram of protein.
4.5. Biocatalyst Preparation and Optimization of Whole-Cell Biotransformation Conditions
−1
Recombinant strains were cultured in LB medium supplemented with 100
µg
·
mL ampicillin at
37 ◦C and 200 rpm shaking. ◦When the culture reached an OD600 of 1.2, 0.2 mM IPTG was added to
induce gene expression at 25 C. After a 6 h induction, cells were harvested by centrifugation from 100
mL of culture at 6000
×
g for 5 min at 4 ◦C and washed twice with 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer
(pH 7.0). The pellets were used as whole-cell biocatalysts.
Batch biotransformation by whole cells was performed at 200 rpm for 20 min in 100 mL flasks with
10 mL of the reaction mixtures containing sodium phosphate buffer, PPA, glucose, and whole cells of
recombinant E. coli pETDuet-ldhL-gdh. To improve the transformation efficiency of the L-LDH and GDH
coupling system, the relevant conditions for biocatalysis were optimized. Different parameters were
varied as follows: cell concentrations were set with an optical density of 10–40 at 600 nm; pH values of 100
mM sodium phosphate buffer were 6.0–8.0; PPA concentrations were 64–160 mM; glucose concentrations
◦
were 0–250 mM; and transformation temperatures were 27–47 C. After 20 min of conversion, the samples
were prepared by 5 min centrifugation at 10,000
resulting supernatants were analyzed by HPLC. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
×
g and 4 ◦C. The concentrations of PPA and PLA in the
4.6. Fed-Batch Bioconversion of L-PLA with Substrate Feeding by the Cofactor Regeneration System
The fed-batch bioconversion process was performed in 250 mL flasks containing 20 mL of the
reaction mixtures. The initial reaction mixtures containing 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0),
glucose (100 mM), PPA (75.4 mM), and cells (OD600 = 25) were incubated at 42 ◦C and 200 rpm for 60
min. PPA (2.5 mL 500 mM) and glucose powder (0.3 g) were both supplemented at 20 and 40 min by a
pulse-feeding strategy.
4.7. Analytical Procedures
PPA and PLA were quantified by HPLC as reported earlier [27]. The stereoselective assay of PLA
was performed by an HPLC system equipped with a CHIRALCEL OJ-RH column (150 × 4.6 mm
)
and a detector (SPD-20AV; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at 210 nm. The mobile phase was a
water/methanol/acetonitrile solvent ◦mixture (900:50:50, v/v/v) containing 0.15% trifluoroacetic acid
at a flow rate of 0.3 mL
·
min−1 at 35 C. The enantiomeric excess (ee) value of L-PLA is defined as
(CL-PLA
−
CD-PLA)/(CL-PLA + CD-PLA
)
×
100%, where CL-PLA and CD-PLA represent the concentrations
of L-PLA and D-PLA, respectively.
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31501459
and No. 31470092) and Changshu Science and Technology Committee Program (CR201709).
Author Contributions: Yibo Zhu conceived and designed the experiments; Yibo Zhu, Ying Wang, Jiayuzi Xu and
Jiahao Chen performed the experiments; Yibo Zhu and Ying Wang analyzed the data; Yibo Zhu and Ying Wang
wrote the paper; Yibo ZHU, Limei Wang and Bin Qi contributed reagents and materials.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Tiwari, B.K.; Valdramidis, V.P.; O’Donnell, C.P.; Muthukumarappan, K.; Bourke, P.; Cullen, P. Application of
natural antimicrobials for food preservation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5987–6000. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Crowley, S.; Mahony, J.; van Sinderen, D. Current perspectives on antifungal lactic acid bacteria as natural
bio-preservatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 33, 93–109. [CrossRef]
2.

Molecules 2017, 22, 1966
10 of 11
3.
Fujita, T.; Nguyen, H.D.; Ito, T.; Zhou, S.; Osada, L.; Tateyama, S.; Kaneko, T.; Takaya, N. Microbial
monomers custom-synthesized to build true bio-derived aromatic polymers. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
2013, 97, 8887–8894. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4.
5.
6.
Dieuleveux, V.; Lemarinier, S.; Gueguen, M. Antimicrobial spectrum and target site of D-3-phenyllactic acid.
Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 40, 177–183. [CrossRef]
Schnurer, J.; Magnusson, J. Antifungal lactic acid bacteria as biopreservatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005
16, 70–78. [CrossRef]
,
Lavermicocca, P.; Valerio, F.; Evidente, A.; Lazzaroni, S.; Corsetti, A.; Gobbetti, M. Purification and
characterization of novel antifungal compounds from the sourdough Lactobacillus plantarum strain 21B.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 4084–4090. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.
Ohhira, I.; Kuwaki, S.; Morita, H.; Suzuki, T.; Tomita, S.; Hisamatsu, S.; Sonoki, S.; Shinoda, S. Identification of
3-phenyllactic acid as a possible antibacterial substance produced by Enterococcus faecalis TH10. Biocontrol Sci.
2004, 9, 77–81. [CrossRef]
8.
9.
Dieuleveux, V.; Guéguen, M. Antimicrobial effects of D-3-phenyllactic acid on Listeria monocytogenes in
TSB-YE medium, milk, and cheese. J. Food Prot. 1998, 61, 1281–1285. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jung, Y.K.; Kim, T.Y.; Park, S.J.; Lee, S.Y. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of
polylactic acid and its copolymers. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 105, 161–171. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Simmons, T.L.; Baker, G.L. Poly(phenyllactide): Synthesis, characterization, and hydrolytic degradation.
Biomacromolecules 2001, 2, 658–663. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Jia, J.; Mu, W.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, B. Bioconversion of phenylpyruvate to phenyllactate: Gene cloning,
expression, and enzymatic characterization of D- and L1-lactate dehydrogenases from Lactobacillus plantarum
SK002. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 162, 242–251. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Kano, S.; Yuasa, Y.; Yokomatsu, T.; Shibuya, S. Highly stereocontrolled synthesis of the four individual
stereoisomers of statine. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3865–3868. [CrossRef]
13. Hashimoto, Y.; Kobayashi, E.; Endo, T.; Nishiyama, M.; Horinouchi, S. Conversion of a cyanhydrin
compound into S-( )-3-phenyllactic acid by enantioselective hydrolytic activity of Pseudomonas sp. BC-18.
−
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1996, 60, 1279–1283. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Nguyen, H.D.; Jin, X.; Kaneko, D.; Kaneko, T. Syntheses of high molecular weight poly (L-phenyllactic acid)
s by a direct polycondensation in the presence of stable Lewis acids. Chem. Lett. 2011, 40, 584–585. [CrossRef]
15. Ariens, E. Stereochemistry, a basis for sophisticated nonsense in pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology.
Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1984, 26, 663–668. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Bubl, E.C.; Butts, J.S. A method of synthesis of phenyllactic acid and substituted phenyllactic acids1. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 4972. [CrossRef]
17. Mu, W.M.; Liu, F.; Jia, J.; Chen, C.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, B. 3-Phenyllactic acid production by substrate feeding
and pH-control in fed-batch fermentation of Lactobacillus sp. SK007. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5226–5229.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Kawaguchi, H.; Uematsu, K.; Ogino, C.; Teramura, H.; Niimi-Nakamura, S.; Tsuge, Y.; Hasunuma, T.;
Oinuma, K.I.; Takaya, N.; Kondo, A. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of kraft pulp by
recombinant Escherichia coli for phenyllactic acid production. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014, 88, 188–194. [CrossRef]
19. Rodríguez-Pazo, N.; Vázquez-Araújo, L.; Pérez-Rodríguez, N.; Cortés-Diéguez, S.; Domínguez, J.M.
Cell-free supernatants obtained from fermentation of cheese whey hydrolyzates and phenylpyruvic acid
by Lactobacillus plantarum as a source of antimicrobial compounds, bacteriocins, and natural aromas.
Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 171, 1042–1060. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. Zheng, Z.; Ma, C.; Gao, C.; Li, F.; Qin, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, K.; Xu, P. Efficient conversion of phenylpyruvic
acid to phenyllactic acid by using whole cells of Bacillus coagulans SDM. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19030.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. Mu, W.M.; Yu, S.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, B. Recent research on 3-phenyllactic acid, a broad-spectrum
antimicrobial compound. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 95, 1155–1163. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Uppada, V.; Bhaduri, S.; Noronha, S.B. Cofactor regeneration—An important aspect of biocatalysis.
Curr. Sci. India 2014, 106, 946–957.
23. Li, X.; Jiang, B.; Pan, B.; Mu, W.; Zhang, T. Purification and partial characterization of Lactobacillus species
SK007 lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) catalyzing phenylpyruvic acid (PPA) conversion into phenyllactic
acid (PLA). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 2392–2399. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Molecules 2017, 22, 1966
11 of 11
24. Prema, P.; Smila, D.; Palavesam, A.; Immanuel, G. Production and Characterization of an Antifungal
Compound (3-Phenyllactic Acid) Produced by Lactobacillus plantarum Strain. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2010, 3,
379–386. [CrossRef]
25. Strom, K.; Sjogren, J.; Broberg, A.; Schnurer, J. Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 393 produces the
antifungal cyclic dipeptides cyclo(L-Phe-L-Pro) and cyclo(L-Phe-trans-4-OH-L-Pro) and 3-phenyllactic acid.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 4322–4327. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Valerio, F.; Lavermicocca, P.; Pascale, M.; Visconti, A. Production of phenyllactic acid by lactic acid bacteria:
An approach to the selection of strains contributing to food quality and preservation. Fems Microbiol. Lett.
2004, 233, 289–295. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Zhu, Y.; Hu, F.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, L.; Qi, B. Enhancement of phenyllactic acid biosynthesis by recognition site
replacement of D-lactate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus pentosus. Biotechnol. Lett. 2015, 37, 1233–1241.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Zhu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wang, L.; Qi, B. Biosynthesis of (R)-2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropionic acid using whole recombinant
Escherichia coli cells in an aqueous/n-octane biphasic system. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B (Biomed. & Biotechnol.) 2017
,
in press. [CrossRef]
29. Zhu, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Chen, J.; Xu, J.; Wang, L.; Qi, B. Fusion of D-Lactate Dehydrogenase and Formate
Dehydrogenase for Increasing Production of (R)-3-Phenyllactic Acid in Recombinant Escherichia coli BL21
(DE3). J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2017, 11, 372–378. [CrossRef]
30. Prasuna, M.L.; Mujahid, M.; Sasikala, C.; Ramana, C.V. L-Phenylalanine catabolism and L-phenyllactic acid
production by a phototrophic bacterium, Rubrivivax benzoatilyticus JA2. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 167, 526–531.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Foster, J.W.; Park, Y.; Penfound, T.; Fenger, T.; Spector, M. Regulation of NAD metabolism in Salmonella
typhimurium: Molecular sequence analysis of the bifunctional nadR regulator and the nadA-pnuC operon.
J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4187–4196. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Berrí, S.J.; Bennett, G.N.; San, K.Y. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli: Increase of NADH availability
by overexpressing an NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenase. Metab. Eng. 2002, 4, 217–229.
33. Alissandratos, A.; Kim, H.K.; Easton, C.J. Formate production through carbon dioxide hydrogenation with
recombinant whole cell biocatalysts. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 164, 7–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Hummel, W.; Kula, M.R. Dehydrogenases for the synthesis of chiral compounds. FEBS. J. 1989, 184, 85–97.
35. Weckbecker, A.; Hummel, W. Glucose Dehydrogenase for the Regeneration of NADPH and NADH, in Microbial
Enzymes and Biotransformations; Barredo, J.L., Ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 225–238.
36. Goldberg, K.; Schroer, K.; Lütz, S.; Liese, A. Biocatalytic ketone reduction—A powerful tool for the production
of chiral alcohols—Part I: Processes with isolated enzymes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 76, 237–248.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Zheng, Z.; Zhao, M.; Zang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Ouyang, J. Production of optically pure L-phenyllactic acid by using
engineered Escherichia coli coexpressing L-lactate dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase. J. Biotechnol.
2015, 207, 45–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
©
2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).