4
514
J.-Q. Wang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 4510–4514
CH Cl (10 mL) at room temperature. The solution was
9
. Zheng, Q.-H.; Stone, K. L.; Mock, B. H.; Miller, K. D.;
Fei, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, J.-Q.; Glick-Wilson, B. E.; Sledge,
G. W.; Hutchins, G. D. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2002, 29, 803.
2
2
stirred for 30 min. TLC showed no starting material left.
The solvent was removed under vacuum to give com-
1
1
0. Zheng, Q.-H.; Fei, X.; DeGrado, T. R.; Wang, J.-Q.; Stone,
K. L.; Martinez, T. D.; Gay, D. J.; Baity, W. L.; Mock, B.
H.; Glick-Wilson, B. E.; Sullivan, M. L.; Miller, K. D.;
Sledge, G. W.; Hutchins, G. D. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2003, 30,
53.
1. Rouze, N. C.; Hutchins, G. D. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.
003, 50, 1491.
2. Frese, T.; Rouze, N. C.; Bouman, C. A.; Sauer, K.;
Hutchins, G. D. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2003, 22, 258.
3. Experimental details and characterization data. (a) Gen-
eral: All commercial reagents and solvents were used
without further purification unless otherwise specified.
Melting points were determined with a MEL-TEMP II
pound 1 (0.56 g, 97%) as a white solid, mp 43–45 ꢁC. H
3
NMR (CDCl , 300 MHz) d 8.64 (d, 1H, J = 6.6 Hz,
pyridyl H), 8.34 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, pyridyl H), 7.90 (dd,
1H, J = 8.9 Hz, J = 5.9 Hz, pyridyl H), 7.02-7.30 (m,
1
2
+
7
10H, phenyl H), 5.58 (s, 2H, CH
3.11 (s, 3H, NCH ), 3.01 (s, 3H, NCH
2
), 4.08 (s, 3H, N CH
), 1.90 (s, 3H, CH
3
),
).
1
1
1
3
3
3
+
2
LRMS (EI, m/z): 181 (100%), 419 [(MꢀOTf) , 1.8%].
27 4 2
HRMS (EI, m/z): calcd for C25H O N : 419.1970, found:
1
1
419.1971. (f) Tracer [ C]1: The precursor (6, 0.5 mg) was
dissolved in acetonitrile (250 lL). The mixture was trans-
ferred to a small volume, three-necked reaction tube.
1
1
[ C]Methyl triflate was passed into an air-cooled reaction
tube at a temperature between ꢀ15 and ꢀ20 ꢁC, which
was generated by a Venturi cooling device powered with
100 psi compressed air, until radioactivity in solution
reached a maximum (2–3 min), and then the reaction tube
was isolated and heated at 70–80 ꢁC for 2–3 min. The
reaction tube was connected to the Silica Sep-Pak. The
labeled product solution mixture was passed onto the SiO2
Sep-Pak for SPE purification by gas pressure. The reaction
tube and Sep-Pak were washed with ethanol (5 mL), and
the washing solution was discarded to a waste bottle. The
1
capillary tube apparatus and were uncorrected. H NMR
spectra were recorded on a Bruker QE 300 NMR
spectrometer using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal
standard. Chemical shift data for the proton resonances
were reported in parts per million (d), relative to the
internal standard TMS (d 0.0). Low-resolution mass
spectra (LRMS) were obtained using a Bruker Biflex III
MALDI-Tof mass spectrometer, and high-resolution mass
spectra (HRMS) were obtained using a Kratos MS80 mass
spectrometer, in the Department of Chemistry at Indiana
University. Chromatographic solvent proportions are
expressed on a volume: volume basis. Thin layer chroma-
1
1
final product [ C]1 was eluted from the Sep-Pak with
90:8:2 H O/EtOH/HOAc (2–4 mL), sterile-filtered through
2
a 0.22 lm cellulose acetate membrane, and collected into a
sterile vial. The pH was adjusted to 5.5–7.0 with 2 M
NaOH and 150 mM NaH PO mixed solution (1/20, 0.2–
2 4
tography was run using Analtech silica gel GF uniplates
(
2
5 · 10 cm ). Plates were visualized by UV light. Normal
phase flash chromatography was carried out on EM
Science silica gel 60 (230–400 mesh) with a forced flow of
the indicated solvent system in the proportions described
below. All moisture-sensitive reactions were performed
under a positive pressure of nitrogen maintained by a
direct line from a nitrogen source. Analytical HPLC was
performed using a Prodigy (Phenomenex) 5 lm C-18
0.4 mL). Total radioactivity was assayed and the total
volume (2.5–5.0 mL) was noted. The overall synthesis time
1
1
was 10–15 min. The decay corrected yields, from CO2,
were 40–65%, and the radiochemical purity was >99% by
analytical HPLC. Retention times in the analytical HPLC
1
1
system were: RT6 = 4.51 min, RT[ C]1 = 2.83 min. The
chemical purity of the target tracer was >93%.
1
1
column, 4.6 · 250 mm; 3:1:1 CH
3
CN/MeOH/20 mM, pH
(buffer solution) mobile phase; flow rate
14. (a) Dynamic IndyPET-II imaging of the tracer [ C]MDDP
in the rats. All animal experiments were performed under a
protocol approved by the Indiana University Institutional
Animal Care and Use Committee. The female Sprague–
Dawley rat (250–300 g) was anesthetized with aceproma-
zine (0.2 mg/kg, im) and torbugesic (0.2 mg/kg, im). 0.2 mCi
ꢀ
6
1
.7 KHPO
4
.5 mL/min; and UV (240 nm) and c-ray (NaI) flow
Sep-Pak type cartridge was
obtained from Waters Corporate Headquarters, Milford,
MA. Sterile Millex-GS 0.22 lm vented filter unit was
obtained from Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA. (b)
= 0.13 (50:1
, 300 MHz) d 8.42 (d,
H, J = 3.7 Hz, ring-H), 7.55 (dd, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz,
detectors. Semi-prep SiO
2
1
1
of [ C]MDDP was administered intravenously to the rat
via the tail vein. The micro-PET images of the tracer were
acquired in IndyPET-II scanner by the ordered subset
expectation maximization (OSEM) using 6 subsets/4 itera-
tions for 60 min dynamic scans from a rat post intravenous
injection of 0.2 mCi of the tracer, and frame durations were
defined as 300 s for entire 3600 s scan. (b) Blocking
Compound 3: a white solid, yield 31%, R
f
1
2 2 3
CH Cl /MeOH). H NMR (CDCl
1
1
J2 = 1.5 Hz, ring-H), 7.27 (dd, 1H, J1 = 8.1 Hz,
J
2
= 5.1 Hz, ring-H), 4.73 (s, 2H, CH
2
OH), 4.22 (br s,
). (c)
1
H, OH), 3.13 (s, 3H, CH ), 3.03 (s, 3H, CH
3
3
1
11
Compound 5: a white solid, yield 96%, mp 35–37 ꢁC. H
NMR (CDCl , 300 MHz) d 7.18–7.42 (m, 10H, phenyl H),
.09 (s, 3H, CH ). (d) Compound 6: a colorless oil, yield
1%, R = 0.48 (1:1 EtOAc/hexane). H NMR (CDCl
IndyPET-II imaging of the tracer [ C]MDDP in the rats
3
with pretreatment drug neostigmine. For the blocking
experiments, the rats (250–300 g) were pretreated by an
intravenous injection in the tail vein with 3.0 mg/kg of
neostigmine in saline 30 min, prior to iv injection of 0.2 mCi
2
5
3
3
1
f
3
,
00 MHz) d 8.42 (dd, 1H, J = 4.4 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz, pyridyl
1
2
1
1
H), 7.56 (dd, 1H, J
(
1
= 8.1 Hz, J
2
= 1.5 Hz, pyridyl H), 7.30
2
= 5.2 Hz, pyridyl H), 7.18–7.25 (m,
[ C]MDDP in the tail vein. After tracer administration, the
animals were handled, as described above. (c) Statistical
analysis. Differences between neostigmine pretreated group
and control group were examined for statistical significance
using StudentÕs t test. A p value less than 0.05 denoted the
presence of a statistically significant difference.
dd, 1H,J
1
= 8.1 Hz, J
1
2
0H, phenyl H), 5.31 (s, 2H, CH ), 2.94 (s, 3H, CH N),
3
2
.87 (s, 3H, CH N), 1.92 (s, 3H, CH ). (e) Compound 1:
3
3
Methyl triflate (115 lL, 1.016 mmol) was added to a
solution of compound 6 (0.41 g, 1.014 mmol) in dry