Notes
Organometallics, Vol. 23, No. 26, 2004 6321
Table 2. Summary of Crystallographic Data for 2
high, indicating that the normal mode of chain transfer
(
â-hydride elimination) was not possible in PNB, given
chem formula
formula wt
temp (K)
C18H36B20Cl4N2Ni
697.20
the geometry of the active growing center. Therefore,
the polymerization took place in a vinyl addition man-
ner. The DSC study of obtained PNB did not give an
endothermic signal upon heating to the decomposition
temperature (above 450 °C).
293(2)
wavelength (Å)
cryst syst
space group
unit cell dimens
a (Å)
0.710 73
monoclinic
P21/n
11.095(4)
b (Å)
21.883(8)
c (Å)
14.564(5)
Conclusion
â (deg)
90.213(5)
3
V (Å )
3536(2)
This report provides the first report of an intramo-
lecularly coordinated nickel complex containing an
o-carboranyl C,N-chelating ligand system. A combina-
tion of X-ray crystallographic and spectroscopic studies
confirms the nature of this nickel complex. A prelimi-
nary study shows that the new nickel complex 2 is
moderately active as a catalyst precursor in norbornene
polymerization. To the best of our knowledge, this is the
first report that this kind of N-functionalized o-carbo-
ranyl late-transition-metal complex exhibits activity
toward vinyl addition polymerization of norbornene.
Further investigations into the polymerization mecha-
nism are ongoing.
Z
4
3
Dcalcd (Mg/m )
1.310
abs coeff (mm-1)
F(000)
0.869
1416
cryst size (mm)
θ range for data collecn (deg)
limiting indices
0.40 × 0.25 × 0.20
1.68-25.01
-13 e h e 13, -22 e k e 26,
-
17 e l e 16
no. of rflns collected
no. of indep rflns
14 683
6214 (R(int) ) 0.0346)
25.01 (99.7%)
0.8454 and 0.7225
full-matrix least squares on F
6214/4/396
completeness to θ (deg)
max and min transmissn
refinement method
2
no. of data/restraints/params
viscosity molecular weights Mv of polymers increased
due to an increase in the Al/Ni molar ratio. We found
Experimental Section
that the complex 2 showed the highest activity at 60
6
General Procedures. All manipulations were performed
°
C (3 × 10 ). The activity of 2 increased when the
using standard Schlenk techniques under an atmosphere of
temperature of polymerization rose from 20 to 60 °C.
This is because the concentration of the active center
activated by MAO increases as the temperature rises.
At the same time 2 usually becomes unstable at high
temperature. The highest activity at 60 °C is the result
of the compromise of two factors. The decomposition of
the active center increased and the activity dropped at
2 2 2
argon. CH Cl and chlorobenzene were dried over CaH and
THF, diethyl ether, hexane, and norbornene over Na and then
distilled under nitrogen immediately prior to use. Methylalu-
minoxane (MAO) and 2-picolyl chloride hydrochloride were
purchased from Witco and Acros, respectively. Other solvents
3 2
were used as received as technical grade solvents. Ni(PPh ) -
2
6
1
13
Cl
2
was prepared according to the literature. H, C, and
B NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker VAVCE-DMX 500
spectrometer in CDCl or o-dichlorobenzene-d . Elemental
analysis was performed on an Elementar Vario EL III ana-
lyzer. Average molecular weight (M ) and molecular weight
distribution (M /M ) values of PBN products were determined
11
8
0 °C. It is clear that the Mv value was lower at higher
5
3
4
temperature. A molecular weight of 9.4 × 10 was
obtained at a reaction time of 20 °C.
w
1
The polymers obtained were characterized by IR, H
w
n
1
3
NMR, C NMR, and GPC analyses. The resonances of
with a PL GPC-220 permeation chromatograph at 150 °C,
using a narrow standards calibration and equipped with three
PL gel columns (sets of PL gel 10m MIXED-BLS). Trichlo-
robenzene was employed as a solvent at a flow rate of 1.00
mL/min. IR (KBr) spectra were recorded on a Nicolet FT-IR
spectrophotometer.
PNB appear at 0.9-3.03 ppm (m, maxima at 1.52, 1.87,
1
2
.23, 2.59 ppm) in the H NMR, and the absence of
-
1
bands at 1680∼1620 cm in the IR spectra indicated
no double bonds, which was different from the polymers
23
of norbornene ring-opening metathesis polymerization.
The C NMR spectrum of PNB shows the main reso-
1
3
1-(2′-Picolyl)-o-carborane (1). To a solution of o-carborane
(
2
288 mg, 2 mmol) in dry Et
2
O (20 mL) at -78 °C was added
.5 M of n-BuLi in hexane (0.8 mL, 2 mmol), and the reaction
mixture was stirred for 1 h at -78 °C. Then 2-picolyl chloride
255 mg, 2 mmol; prepared by neutralizing picolyl chloride
nances at δ 30.0-48.8 ppm (m, maxima at 32.43, 39.12,
4
8.39, 48.77 ppm), attributed to the vinyl-addition
polymer structure of polynorbornene, bridge carbon,
bridgehead carbon, and the backbone carbon.24 Fur-
thermore, the product of cationic or free-radical polym-
erization of norbornene is usually formed with low
molecular weight (molecular weight <1000) and low
yield because of the rearrangements and transfer reac-
(
18
hydrochloride ) was added at -78 °C, and the stirred reaction
mixture was warmed to room temperature for 1 h. Addition
3
of water (30 cm ) dissolved the nascent LiCl, and the separated
Et
O layer was further washed with water (2 × 30 mL) before
being isolated and dried over Na SO . Filtration, followed by
2
2
4
2
5
tions. The GPC molecular weights Mw and intrinsic
viscosity molecular weights Mv of polymers were very
removal of the solvent in vacuo, gave a white solid. Unreacted
o-carborane was removed by slow vacuum sublimation (40 °C,
0
.01 mmHg) to give analytically pure 1 (250 mg, 57% yield).
-
1
IR (KBr, cm ): 3069, 3020 m (br) (carborane CH), 2916 w,
2848 w (pyridyl/CH str), 2596 vs, 2575 s (BH); 1593 s, 1570
(
23) (a) Sacchi, M. C.; Sonzogni, M.; Losio, S.; Forlin, F. Macromol.
Chem. Phys. 2001, 202, 2052-2058. (b) Barnes, D. A.; Benedikt, G.
M.; Goodall, B. L.; Huang, S. S. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 2623-2632.
2
m, 1476 s, 1438 s (pyridyl skel), 1095 m, 1063 m, 1017 m, 769
(
24) Huang, W. J.; Chang, F. C.; Chu, P. P. J. Polym. Sci. 2000, 38,
1
s, 751 m (CH oop and carborane skel), 719 s (br) (BH wag). H
2
3
554-2563. Mi, X.; Ma, Z.; Cui, N. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 88, 3273-
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl
pyridyl), 7.26 (1H, m, pyridyl), 7.18 (1H, d, pyridyl), 4.08 (1H,
s, C2H), 3.66 (1H, m, CH ), 3.55 (1H, m, CH ).
3
): δ 8.56 (1H, d, pyridyl), 7.70 (1H, m,
278.
(
25) (a) Gaylord, N. G.; Deshpande, A. B.; Mandal, B. M.; Martan,
M. J. Macromol. Sci. Chem. 1977, A11(5), 1053-1070. (b) Gaylord, N.
G.; Mandal, B. M.; Martan, M. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Lett. Ed. 1976,
2
2
1
4, 555-559. (c) Gaylord, N. G.; Deshpande, A. B. J. Polym. Sci., Polym.
Lett. Ed. 1976, 14, 613-617.
(26) Venanzi, L. M. J. Chem. Soc. 1958, 719-724.