C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 3. Proposed TS structure for PFTase-catalyzed reaction based on
calculations using GPP and ethane thiolate. The second isoprene unit is
omitted for clarity. Colors: S (orange), C (green), and O (red).
In summary, we present here a TS structure for the reaction
catalyzed by PFTase that complements X-ray crystallographic
studies15 and provides a clear structural framework for understand-
ing the results of previous mechanistic investigations of this enzyme,
including stereochemical1 and kinetic analyses.
6,17
14,18
The experi-
ments reported here provide powerful insights into an important
class of biological reactions through a combination of model
chemistry, computation, and kinetic analysis. Finally, it should be
noted that the KIE analysis described here was accomplished
through experiments performed with stable isotopes and did not
require radiolabeled compounds. It is likely that the role of ESI-
MS and NMR in KIE analyses of biological processes will continue
to grow in the future.
Figure 2. Isoprenoid substrates and prenylation reaction catalyzed by
PFTase studied here.
deconvoluted into ratios of labeled and unlabeled species using
spectra obtained from pure labeled and unlabeled products; the V/K
13
KIE using [1- C]-GPP as a substrate calculated from that data was
found to be 1.039 ( 0.003. A similar approach was used to measure
2
2
2
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Institutes of Health (GM58442) and the National Science Founda-
tion (CHE-0610183).
2 2
the R-secondary H KIE, using [1- H ]-GPP (prepared from [1- H ]-
geraniol)12 as a substrate, which was found to be 1.068 ( 0.003.
To determine the structural significance of these KIE values, a TS
structure for the nonenzymatic reaction between ethane thiolate and
GPP via an associative mechanism was computationally determined;
a density functional level of electronic structure theory using the
mPW1N functional in combination with the 6-31+G(d) basis set
was employed for those calculations. An associative model was
chosen for the starting point for these calculations since a significant
Supporting Information Available: Details for the synthesis of
13
[
f
1- C]-GPP, c determination, KIE experiments, TS calculations, and
data analysis are included. This material is available free of charge via
the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
primary 13C KIE was observed only in the S
2 model reaction
N
(
(
1) Zhang, F. L.; Casey, P. J. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 1996, 65, 241-269.
2) Doll, R. J.; Kirschmeier, P.; Bishop, W. R. Curr. Opin. Drug DiscoVery
DeV. 2004, 7, 478-486.
described above. For the nonenzymatic reaction between GPP and
ethane thiolate, the primary 13C KIE was calculated to be 1.067.
Interestingly, this value is significantly higher than the experimen-
tally measured value of 1.039 determined for the enzymatic reaction,
indicating that the TS structure for the protein-catalyzed process
must be somewhat different. Iterative cycles of altering the C-O
(
3) Taylor Ringia, E. A.; Tyler, P. C.; Evans, G. B.; Furneaux, R. H.; Murkin,
A. S.; Schramm, V. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7126-7127.
4) Schramm, V. L. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 1998, 67, 693-720.
(
(5) O’Brien, P. J.; Herschlag, D. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 3207-3225.
(
6) Singleton, D. A.; Thomas, A. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9357-
9358.
(
leaving group) and C-S (nucleophile) bond lengths and calculation
(
7) Hehre, W. J.; Radom, L.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Pople, J. A. Ab Initio
13
of the resulting primary C KIE were used to generate a plot of
the variation of the 13C KIE with C-O and C-S bond lengths; a
similar plot was created for the R-secondary H KIE. Using the
Molecular Orbital Theory, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1986.
(8) Cramer, C. J. Essentials of Computational Chemistry: Theories and
Models, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2004.
2
(
9) Moores, S. L.; Schaber, M. D.; Mosser, S. D.; Rands, E.; O’Hara, M. B.;
Garsky, V. M.; Marshall, M. S.; Pompliano, D. L.; Gibbbs, J. B. J. Biol.
Chem. 1991, 266, 14603-14610.
two KIEs reported here enabled us to computationally identify a
set of C-O (1.69 Å) and C-S (3.70 Å) TS bond lengths that are
consistent with both measurements; a proposed structure for the
TS is shown in Figure 3. Interestingly, the C-O bond lengths in
(
10) Northrop, D. B. Biochemistry 1975, 14, 2644-2651.
(11) Furfine, E. S.; Leban, J. J.; Landavazo, A.; Moomaw, J. F.; Casey, P. J.
Biochemistry 1995, 34, 6857-6862.
(
12) Clausen, V. A.; Edelstein, R. L.; Distefano, M. D. Biochemistry 2001,
0, 3920-3930.
(13) Dolence, J. M.; Poulter, C. D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92,
N
the model S 2 TS and enzymatic TS are essentially the same.
4
However, the C-S bond lengths are substantially different with
the enzymatic TS (3.70 Å), manifesting less bonding to C-1 of GPP
than is present in the model system (2.80 Å). This suggests lower
5008-5011.
(
(
(
(
(
14) Pais, J. E.; Bowers, K. E.; Fierke, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
15086-15087.
15) Reid, T. S.; Terry, K. L.; Casey, P. J.; Beese, L. S. J. Mol. Biol. 2004,
N
electron density at C-1 than is typified by S 2 reactions and provides
343, 417-433.
a rationale for why substrates containing electron-withdrawing
substituents decrease the enzymatic reaction rate.13 It should be
noted that the KIEs reported here for yeast PFTase are similar, but
not identical, to KIEs recently reported by Pais et al. for a
mammalian PFTase.14 These variations may reflect differences in
the TS structures between the yeast and mammalian enzymes that
could be exploited for drug design.
16) Mu, Y. Q.; Omer, C. A.; Gibbs, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
117-123.
17) Edelstein, R. L.; Weller, V. A.; Distefano, M. D.; Tung, J. S. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 5298-5299.
18) Huang, C.-c.; Hightower, K. E.; Fierke, C. A. Biochemistry 2000, 39,
2593-2602.
JA069119J
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 129, NO. 18, 2007 5797