Complexes Produced by Reaction of CuCN with Diamines
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 38, No. 5, 1999 985
Scheme 3
and washed with distilled water. All preparations were carried out in
the presence of air, and all of the new compounds reported have proven
to be stable in air for periods in excess of 1 year.
3 2
Preparation of (CuCN) (HMTA) (1). In a variation of the usual
preparation, hexamethylenetetramine (280 mg, 2 mmol) was dissolved
at room temperature in the “standard solution”. Within minutes, a white
precipitate formed that was dissolved by swirling the flask over a steam
bath. The hot, essentially clear solution was filtered, corked, and set
aside on an insulated surface. Within a few hours, glistening micro-
crystals were evident. After 1 day, the bottom of the flask was covered
with colorless crystals, but the product was not isolated until the twelfth
day. By then the solution had taken on a very faint blue tint. The white
crystalline product (124 mg, 22.6%) gave an IR spectrum that was
identical to the IR spectrum of an authentic sample.
2 3
Preparation of Cu (CN) (dabco-H) (2). To the “standard solution”
was added 1,4-diazobicyclo[2.2.2]octane (112 mg, 1 mmol), which
dissolved with mild heating. After the colorless solution was heated to
8
8 °C and filtered, it was transferred to test tubes that were suspended
in a 40 °C water bath that was allowed to cool spontaneously to room
temperature. Crystals began to appear after the first few hours. The
product (pale pink crystals, 108 mg, 33.9%) was collected by filtration
after 2 days: IR 3420 br, w, 3020 s, 2955 w, 2770 w, 2608 w, 2130
w, 2075 s, 1620 br, w, 1465 w, 1450 m, 1392 s, 1372 w, 1312 m,
series of straight-chain diamines of the general structure H2N-
(CH2)nNH2 were explored, where n ) 3-6. In most cases, the
1
4
236 w, 1173 w, 1047 s, 1020 w, 987 w, 830 m, 795 s, 603 m, 595 w,
05 w cm . Anal. Calcd for C H13Cu N : C, 33.96; H, 4.12; Cu, 39.92;
9 2 5
diamines tested did produce insoluble solid complexes that gave
positive chemical tests for Cu and IR spectral evidence for both
CN and ligand. However, not all of these products were
stoichiometric and not all produced crystals suitable for X-ray
structure determinations. Scheme 3 shows the transformations
that led to the complexes whose crystal structures are reported
in this paper.
-1
N, 22.00. Found: C, 33.21, 33.82; H, 4.06, 4.14; Cu, 42.67, 42.43; N,
2
1.30, 21.82.
2
Preparation of (CuCN) (dmpip) (3). To 30 mL of the “standard
solution” was added 1,4-dimethylpiperazine (114 mg, 1 mmol).
Warming caused the ligand to dissolve, and after the temperature
reached about 80 °C, the colorless solution was filtered and then placed
in a 60 °C water bath. The water bath was allowed to cool slowly over
a period of several hours to room temperature. Crystal growth was
evident the next day, but the product was not collected for 5 days. The
colorless prisms amounted to 33 mg (11%): IR 3450 br, m, 2973 m,
The structures of the ligands are as follows:
2
950 w, 2890 w, 2815 m, 2760 w, 2705 w, 2140 s, 1670 br, w, 1630
br, w, 1455 s, 1422 w, 1377 w, 1297 m, 1158 m, 1128 w, 1100 w,
-
1
1
057 w, 1017 s, 917 w, 825 m, 638 w, 433 w cm . Anal. Calcd for
: C, 32.76; H, 4.81; Cu, 43.33; N, 19.10. Found: C, 32.08;
H, 4.88; Cu, 44.36; N, 18.83.
Preparation of (CuCN) (pip) (4). Piperazine hexahydrate (194 mg,
mmol) dissolved readily in the “standard solution” to give a clear
8 2 4
C H14Cu N
2
1
solution. After being heated on a hot plate to 85 °C, the solution took
on a light tan color, and a fine, dusty tan precipitate appeared. Filtration
produced a clear solution that was placed in an 80 °C water bath that
was allowed to cool slowly to room temperature. Crystal growth was
evident within 2 h. The following day, the first crop of product was
collected by filtration (predominantly clear prisms, with a few brown
present, 100 mg, 37.7%). The mother liquor later produced another
batch of crystals, which turned out to be 5 (see next preparation): IR
3
430 br, m, 3265 s, 2938 m, 2870 w, 2835 w, 2195 s, 2045 m, 1625
Experimental Section
br, w, 1455 m, 1443 w, 1323 m, 1282 w, 1108 s, 1093 m, 997 m, 860
s, 627 m cm . Anal. Calcd for C H10Cu N : C, 27.17; H, 3.80; Cu,
6 2 4
47.91; N, 21.12. Found: C, 26.94.; H, 3.88; Cu, 48.09; N, 21.36.
Found: C, 27.26.; H, 4.63; Cu, 45.51; N, 20.92.
-
1
General Methods. Commercial chemicals were used without further
purification. Infrared spectra were recorded as KBr pellets with a Perkin-
Elmer model 1430. Except where noted, all elemental analyses were
determined by Galbraith Laboratories, Knoxville, TN. The crystal
structures were determined by the X-ray Service Laboratory, Depart-
ment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
General Methods of Preparation. To prepare crystals of sufficient
size for X-ray structure determinations, the following standard procedure
was used. Copper(I) cyanide (270 mg, 3 mmol) was added to a solution
5
2 3
Preparation of Cu (CN) (pip-H) (5). The mother liquor from the
previous experiment produced a second crop of crystals over a 3 day
period at room temperature (thick brown diamond shaped plates, 20
mg, 6.8%). Anal. Calcd for C H11Cu N : C, 28.77; H, 3.79; Cu, 43.48;
7 2 5
N, 23.96. Found: C, 28.64; H, 3.75: Cu, 43.84; N, 23.99. We have
found in other preparations using the same procedure with piperazine
that a delay in collection of the product increases the proportion of 5
produced relative to 4. For example, filtration after 11 days produced
a product mixture consisting of 80 mg of large brown diamond-shaped
crystals (5), easily separated from 40 mg of small white crystals (4):
IR 3250 m, 3165 w, 3110 w, 3040 s, 2810 w, 2625 w, 2440 w, 2110
s, 1670 br, w, 1580 s, 1460 m, 1447 m, 1410 m, 1387 m, 1298 w,
1200 w, 1110 m, 1060 w, 1027 w, 995 m, 973 s, 880 w, 867 m, 815
prepared by dissolving Na
2
S
2
O
3
2
‚5H O (2.482 g, 10 mmol) in 30 mL
of distilled water (this is called the “standard solution”). After the CuCN
dissolved, the ligand was added (1.0 mmol), and the mixture was heated
and stirred until clear. The hot solution was filtered by gravity, and
except where noted, the filtrate was poured into several small test tubes
(
13 mm × 100 mm) that were immersed in a hot water (400 mL) bath.
The bath was either held at elevated temperatures for several hours on
a steam cone or allowed to cool spontaneously on an insulated surface.
After crystal growth appeared to be complete (rate of crystal growth
dependent upon ligand), the crystals were collected by suction filtration
-
1
w, 600 w, 466 m, 425 w cm
.
(5) This analysis was performed by M-H-W Laboratories, Phoenix, AZ.